Regarding Those “Adults in the Room”

Boy, THAT quote didn’t age well…

House Democratic Whip Rep. Katherine Clark (MA) joined Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar (CA), and Democratic Caucus Vice Chair Ted Lieu (CA) for a press conference in May of 2023 that began with Clark declaring, “It is Democrats who’ve been the adults in the room. It is Democrats who’ve prioritized Americans over political gamesmanship.”

Last night I rewatched “All the President’s Men.” I was struck by how similar Nixon’s attempts to cripple potential Democratic Party challengers resembled the various unethical measures taken by President Obama’s minions and President Biden’s puppeteers to bury Donald Trump, but that’s a different topic. What I was immediately impressed with was how an archival film of Nixon’s State of the Union Address in 1972 showed the entire audience consisting of both parties of both houses of Congress rising and applauding the President as he entered the chamber. They did this because Nixon, as divisive and loathed as he was by the American Left, was the goddamn President of the United States, had been elected by the American people, and it was every member of Congress’s duty to show the office due respect.

And it still is. Today’s Democrats (and, tragically, their Trump Deranged supporters), however, choose to behave like spit-ball shooting grade-schoolers, debasing the nation and its institutions in the process. Jonathan Turley said yesterday that when he was a House leadership page, every member of the House of Representatives would have voted to censure a Congressman who behaved like Al Green, because, quite simply, his disgusting conduct deserved condemnation and it was crucial for Congress to insist of standards of decorum. Today’s Democratic House members saluted Green as a martyr, and behaved like the student protesters of the Sixties. You know, adults.

Here are a few other notable examples of Democrats and their anti-Trump cult followers behaving like adults in the past few days:

  • Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX, currently being promoted as a rising (and exciting!) leader of the Democratic Party, participated in the “24-Hour State of the People Marathon,”  a protest event designed to counter the President’s address to Congress earlier this week. (Why wasn’t it called the “24-Hour Joint Address to the People”?) In one segment, Crockett said, “As they have decided to go after immigrants and things like that, and they’ve said, ‘Oh, they’ve taken your black job, they’ve taken your black jobs. Not really, they are obviously jobs that they want us to go back to, such as work in the fields, alright? Those immigrants that come into our country, they work the fields, something that we ain’t done in a long time. And clearly, he is trying to make us go back to the fields.”

Gee, good point Congresswoman!

  • In the same event, Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA)—you know, the genius who expressed fear that Guam might flip over because there are too many U.S. troops and military equipment there?—added, regarding the Trump administration plan to shut down the Dept. of Education, “It’s a recipe to make education unavailable to Black people. It puts us back to when America was ‘great,’ and we were picking cotton and doing the productivity that they’re putting my Latino brothers and sisters who migrate here to do that work because we are not suited intellectually to do it anymore. But they would have us back, confined to doing that kind of work.” 

What age group would that logic appeal to, I wonder?

  • Over at The View—a news show, according to ABC—the adult lawyer on the panel (Sunny Hostin), while asserting that all the Democrats in the joint session should have followed the example of adulthood provide by Rep. Green, said, “Representative Green gave them the example, the Democrats are not meeting the moment. It is very clear that Medicaid is on the table, it is very clear that Social Security is on the table, it is very clear that people will die. The Baby Boomers, the civil rights generation, they knew what to do. They knew how to fight and die for their rights. This generation of Congress, they are not meeting the moment. This is an existential threat! They should be ashamed of themselves. They all should’ve walked out with him!” The obscure Democratic Senator who delivered the party’s rebuttal to the President’s speech also claimed that the Republican want to cut Medicare and Social Security benefits. There is no evidence that this is true (although it should be); admittedly I have trouble with adult reasoning, but I’m guessing that the Adults in the Room equate DOGE trying to address Social Security and Mediacre waste and fraud as “cutting benefits.”

I can’t wait until I grow up and am capable of such analysis.

  • Over at the academia side of the Axis, adult professor Professor Basil Smikle of Columbia University  attacked DOGE on MSNBC by sayng,

“There are people who are charged with trying to find savings. So yes, it’s an attack on government, but it’s also an attack on this government. What I mean by that is it’s an attack on this government that used to be headed by a black man.  It’s an attack on this government that almost elected a black woman to the highest office in the land.”

Smikle is a lecturer of international and public affairs at the Ivy League college, and clearly, I do not have the adult intellectual training to comprehend his analysis. DOGE is racist because it is trying to identify wasted money in a nation that once elected a black man as President and almost elected an idi…sorry, a black woman as President? Wow, that’s too intellectual and mature for me: I just don’t get it.

Adults.

______________

Sources: Red State; Daily Caller; Victory Girls

8 thoughts on “Regarding Those “Adults in the Room”

  1. This, “They’re going after Medicaid and Social Security!” alarmist talking point (and it’s clearly a talking point and nothing more) is so blatant and annoying. There ought to be a law prohibiting the composing, distributing and spouting of talking points. Or maybe an FEC rule. They are invariably stupid and transparent. They demean the spouter and the voter to whom they are purportedly addressed. They cheapen the entire political arena and make everyone look childish.

  2. On a related note, here is an interesting comment on a Reason article.

    https://reason.com/volokh/2025/03/05/wednesday-open-thread-6/?comments=true#comment-10944117

    In future years Democrats are goung to look back at going all in to kneecap Trump in his first term and win in 2020 as a collosal mistake.

    I know I’m going to get pushback about the going “all in” and going past normal opposition tactics, so here are the major instances:
    -The Russiagate hoax
    -The 18 month Mueller investigation
    – The Ukrainian impeachment
    – Encouraging the George Floyd riots (wasn’t Tim Walz much more culpable than Trump?)
    – Exploiting covid to relax voting rules and enforcement
    – Using Social media allies to suppress legitimate news like Covid origins
    – Deep state meddling like the 51 former intelligence officials trying to cover up Hunters laptop.

    None of that was illegal, and I don’t expect anyone to apologize or even acknowledge it.

    But in future years Progrssives are going to say “If we just let Trump serve another 4 years, it would have been more of a continuation mixing policy successes, and political and personell foundering in the second term, rather than the laser focused (ok its more like an unfocused but intentional earthquake shockwave) destruction hitting Democratic institutions and the bureaucracy, but I repeat myself, now.

    This was compounded by picking a 2020 candidate who had “good for half a term only” tatoored on his forehead, and a DEI hire VP that can’t talk about anything without using at least 500 words without saying anything. Then they turn policy over to a buch of MMT apparatchiks that pick the 20 side of every single major 80-20 issue, like illegal immigration, criminal justice “reform”, transitioning confused prepubescents, and even the internal combustion engine, kneecapping them trying to win a 2024 rematch

    Trump is still sore anout 2020, and I don’t know whether he will ever admit he lost or not, but he should be thankful because getting 4 years to plot his sequel was the best thing for him, and the country, and he should thank the Dems for it.

    Trumps 2nd term is going to be a model for Republicans for the next half century.

    • Michael, I think the Russia hoax and the Vindman impeachment were rife with all sorts of illegality. Falsification of documents, perjury, conspiracy, destruction of evidence. The Russia “collusion” project was the dirtiest trick in the history of American politics.

  3. Maybe all those soon to be unemployed government workers can “learn to code” or “find jobs in green energy”. No one seems too appalled when businesses go bankrupt and leave their people unemployed.
    “According to Coresight Research, approximately 15,000 stores will close this year in the U.S.”

    Is this an accurate number? I don’t know but I do know a lot of people will lose their jobs. No one is making a fuss about them.
    https://wwd.com/feature/stores-closing-list-1236929748

  4. One measure of how an adult behaves is how he reacts after a loss or a setback.

    Hopefully, he will look at that defeat and try to learn what caused it, what he can do better, how he can make amends, and plan for the next try.

    And that gives us: DOGE! It gives us the blitzkrieg of cabinet nominations, executive orders, and the like. Trump 2.0 is the product of thinking about what went wrong and how to do it better. By comparison to Al Green, Trump looks like a sage elder.

    The GOP as a whole went through something like this after 2008 and 2012. We saw what happened when we ran candidates like McCain and, especially, Romney, and said “We need a fighter.” What ever else you can say about Trump, he is that.

Leave a reply to Old Bill Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.