Is It Ethical to Continue to Slam Former President Biden Now That It Has Been Revealed That He Has Metastatic Prostate Cancer?

ABSOLUTELY!

I might have published that answer in a slightly smaller font if it were not so obvious that the news of Biden’s probably fatal malady was timed to mute the outrage over the Hur interview tapes as well as the emerging evidence of how disabled The Worst President Ever was during the latter part of his administration.

I don’t wish death on anyone (well, almost); I empathize with any human being and his or her loved ones who have to go through this ordeal. But Biden’s revealed health issues are absolutely unrelated to his culpability for the train wreck his term as President became, and he should not be spared criticism, condemnation, exposure and contempt for a single second because of his illness.

I checked: at least six relatively recent serial killers perished of various forms of cancer this century….

Richard Ramirez (The Night Stalker): Convicted of 13 murders and numerous other offenses, Ramirez died of complications from B-cell lymphoma in 2013 while awaiting execution.

Joseph Edward Duncan III: Known for kidnapping and murdering multiple victims, including the Groene family in Idaho, Duncan died of brain cancer in 2021.

Carl Eugene Watts (The Sunday Morning Slasher): Suspected of killing over 100 women, Watts died of prostate cancer in 2007 while serving a life sentence.

Peter Tobin: Serving three life sentences for murder, Tobin died in 2022 after suffering from prostate cancer, vascular disease, and dementia.

Harry Edward Greenwell (The I-65 Killer): Linked to at least three murders in Indiana and Kentucky, Greenwell died of cancer in 2013 before being identified as a serial killer.

William Darrell Lindsey: Known as “Crazy Bill”, Lindsey murdered six women in Florida and one in North Carolina. He died of cancer in 2001 while imprisoned

Joe Biden and the party that installed him did far more harm to far more Americans and the nation not only than any one of those monsters, but than all of them combined.

Sure, I’m sorry Joe is sick. I’m still not letting him or the people who used him off the metaphorical hook for their actions. CNN has this headline: “President Biden has metastatic prostate cancer. Here’s what you should know.”

This is what you should know: the cancer is being cynically employed by the Axis of Unethical Conduct as a distraction and deflection to duck accountability. Don’t let them get away with it.

6 thoughts on “Is It Ethical to Continue to Slam Former President Biden Now That It Has Been Revealed That He Has Metastatic Prostate Cancer?

  1. I wish the media analysts of Biden would shift their focus of discussion/investigation to the ethics and deceit of those behind the curtain pulling the strings. We already know about the morally bankrupt elder abuser First Lady Liar Jill, but who else was involved and how did the whole process work?

    I still (sort of) enjoy disparaging Biden to family/friends/acquaintances but my heart isn’t really in it anymore given his condition. Dementia is that bad of an affliction. However in the interest of full disclosure, lately I find myself referring to Biden as “The Vegetable” after learning that was the street name White House staffers used in private conversations. Is that wrong? Should I not do that?

  2. Agreeing with Batman. Did Jill orchestrate this all by herself? It seems as though it would take a committee to do this.

  3. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: About 50% of men between the ages of 51 and 60 have BPH, and that number jumps to 70% among men aged 60 to 69 and around 80% of men over 70 years of age. Approximately 1 in 8 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer during their lifetime, making it one of the most common cancers among men. A PsA blood test is a normal occurrence fo men over the age of 70.

    Based on the above and my experience with prostate cancer, I believe that Biden’s doctor (and I don’t mean Jill) should be brought up in front of the medical board and lose his license. Any competent urologist would order a PsA test.

  4. One does not get to stage 5 Gillead 9 prostate cancer with bone metastatis without some signs. Signs which are found in following the PSA levels of men. It is routine standard of care and BTW a medicare requirement, for men to receive an anuual PSA level.

    I recall his physician broadcasting the “excellent results” of his physical during the campaign. that physician either lied, or is incompetent.

    This past administrations has the defintie odor of mendacity, as burl Ives asked.

Leave a reply to deacondan86 Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.