Update on the Jay Jones Fiasco

As related here, Jay Jones is the (black, so he can do no wrong and accusing him of such is racism) Democratic candidate for Virginia Attorney General who through texts made it clear to a colleague that he believed that his adversaries deserved to be killed, and worse, that their children (“little fascists”) deserved to be killed as well.

To those who, like his desperate defenders, claim this was “just a mistake”—you know, like Joe Biden’s debate meltdown was “just a bad night”—I reply that Jones’ rants were signature significance. He wasn’t joking (compared to Jones’ “jokes,” Jimmy Kimmel’s Charley Kirk comments were comedy gold) and a normal, decent, trustworthy human being never even thinks about wanting his adversaries’ family members dead, much less communicates them to others. No, not even once.

Jones’ pathetic excuses as he tried to extricate himself from his self-made PR nightmare were 1) “Everybody does it,” but in fact nobody does it, at least nobody worthy of being a lawyer and public servant, and 2) the story was leaked by “Trump-controlled media,” when in fact the messenger was the relentlessly and famously anti-Trump National Review.

This is a bad guy.

Of course, Republicans, including the President and Vice-President, are calling on Jones to withdraw from the race. Morons. They should want him to stay in the race as a test of just how devoid of principles and standards Democrats are, while urging the public to take note of who stands by him. So far, that watch has revealed magnificent hypocrisy, led by repeat Ethics Dunce Virginia Senator Tim Kaine, Hillary’s running mate in 2016 (Why are Democrats so bad at picking Vice-Presidents?). He repeated his endorsement of Jones, noting that had apologized (badly) and that the “statements were not in character” (The Pazuzu Excuse). Kaine is an infamous hypocrite: social media wags recall that 20 years ago Kaine had insisted that Republican George Allen had disqualified himself for the Senate by referring to a photographer of color as “macacca” a Spanish word for “monkey.”

The most hypocritical of Jones’ supporters has to be this group…

…yes, the PAC spawned by the attempted killing of Democratic Rep. Gaby Giffords, an anti-gun group. The PAC, which endorsed Jones before his “two bullets” outburst, still has its Jones endorsement on its website. But Jones has cancelled fundraisers since the scandal broke, and his campaign appears to be in trouble, with contributions drying up and a surge in donations to his opponent. 

10 thoughts on “Update on the Jay Jones Fiasco

  1. ” …the story was leaked by ‘Trump-controlled media,’ when in fact the messenger was the relentlessly and famously anti-Trump National Review.”

    These days, the news outlet doesn’t matter. The narrative is that formerly-“reliable”-leftist media is now kowtowing to Trump because it is intimidated by his dictator-like tactics and/or is run by money-grubbing Republican CEOs who are ordering the put-upon plucky journalists to engage in “both-sideism” to make a profit.

    I see this narrative constantly on social media.

  2. It’s insane how the “tone down the rhetoric” crowd from the left is tone-deaf on this matter. Still looking for intellectual honesty from them. Not holding breath.

  3. The Jay Jones fiasco raises some other ethical issues.

    • 1) This matter underscores the downsides of early voting. About 300,000 people already cast their votes before news about the text messages broke. How many of those votes would have voted differently given these text messages? What happens with these votes if Jay Jones drops out of the race? Would that effectively not disenfranchise these voters?
    • 2) Assume that Jay Jones drops out of the race, what are the options for the Democrats? Are they able to pull a Torricelli, and replace him with another Democrat candidate? Or will the race for AG forfeited, and Miyares wins by default?
    • 3) In 1998 Senator Bob Packwood (R-OR) was expelled from the Senate with support of the Republicans (including Senator Mitch McConnell) because of his sexual appropriate conduct. Oregon has not had a Republican Senator since. In 1998 the Republican senators considered ethics and proper personal conduct more important than winning an election. This attitude have been eroded in politics since the Clinton impeachment trial as that displayed the attitude of the Democrats that winning is everything. The Republicans also dropped their standards for personal conduct, by overlooking things like marital infidelity (Trump). We can have some discussion about whether the old Republican approach is always the ethically correct approach; e.g. when David Duke ran for governor in Louisiana against a criminally corrupt incumbent, the campaign slogan supporting the incumbent became “Vote for the crook, it is important!”.
    • 4) Assume Jay Jones wins the race for AG, what does this tell about the people who voted for him? What does this tell about Abigail Spanberger who campaigns on the slogan “Let your rage fuel you”. What about Tim Kaine? No Democrat politician has called for Jay Jones to drop out of the race.
    • There are various conservative commentators (Matt Walsh, Tim Pool et al) who keep repeating the sentiment that the Democrats want the conservatives dead; hereby the understanding is the Democrats that want you dead are now the mainstream Democrats including your neighbors. Matt Walsh already commented that this is how civil wars could start. I hope this is hyperbole, but I am more and more inclined to believe that the political situation of the USA starts resembling the Weimar Republic, and that something really sinister is brewing. The USA is moving from a high trust society to a low trust society.
    • CVB asked: “How many of those votes would have voted differently given these text messages?” I suspect very few would have changed their votes. Early voters are predetermined to vote for the candidate of choice come Hell or high water.

      jvb

  4. Arguably, the best way for the Trump admin to ensure he stays in the race is to publicly claim he should step down. As such, morons may not be fair. Vance at least seems like he’d be capable of exploiting the cognitive dissonance of TDS victims to get them to support the insupportable.

  5. Obviously he should be expelled from the party.

    Obviously, he won’t be.

    The GOP senate just confirmed a hundred judges with no examination of their suitability. This is the new standard in the USA. The Rot is bipartisan.

Leave a reply to A M Golden Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.