I didn’t bother to read Prof. Appiah’s answer. The right answer is right there in the Rationalizations List:
13. The Saint’s Excuse: “It’s for a good cause”
“This rationalization has probably caused more death and human suffering than any other. The words “it’s for a good cause” have been used to justify all sorts of lies, scams and mayhem. It is the downfall of the zealot, the true believer, and the passionate advocate that almost any action that supports “the Cause,’ whether it be liberty, religion, charity, or curing a plague, is seen as being justified by the inherent rightness of the ultimate goal. Thus Catholic Bishops protected child-molesting priests to protect the Church, and the American Red Cross used deceptive promotions to swell its blood supplies after the September 11, 2001 attacks. The Saint’s Excuse allows charities to strong-arm contributors, and advocacy groups to use lies and innuendo to savage ideological opponents. The Saint’s Excuse is that the ends justify the means, because the “saint” has decided that the ends are worth any price—especially when that price will have to be paid by someone else.”
While we’re here, #13 A might as well be considered too, since this ethics dim–wit mentioned the magic words, “the director’s intentions were good.”
From Rationalization 13A The Road To Hell, or “I meant well”…
‘While the wielder of the Saint’s Excuse typically at least has a beneficial or valuable result to claim as justification for unethical and inexcusable acts, the desperate employers of 13A only have their alleged good intentions, which may be the product of emotion, misunderstanding, ignorance or stupidity. How a bad actor intended his unethical conduct to turn out is no mitigation at all. The underlying “logic” is that the wrongdoer isn’t a bad person, so the wrongful act shouldn’t be held against him or her as harshly as if he was. The logic is flawed and dangerous, encouraging the reckless not to consider the substance of a course of action, but only its motivations. The Saint’s Excuse attempts to justify unethical actions that accomplish worthy goals. The Road to Hell attempts to justify unethical conduct even when it does undeniable harm, just because it was undertaken with admirable intent.”
I wonder if the extra bags went to people the director knew personally.