The ficks are running thick this spring!
You know “Mersault” is an unethical and untrustworthy pundit because he, she or it won’t let readers know who is writing this far left, biased, garbage. (That’s a photo of the writer above) The author had the nerve to send this substack post to me unasked, and given its quality and content, I regard that act as in the same category as putting a flaming bag of poo on my doorstep.
Pages: 1 2
Ethics Alarms 
In my opinion, Mersault made the entire thing up, it’s pure fiction, he’s a baldfaced liar.
That seems entirely possible.
Yeah, all those quotes sound exactly like what Trump’s critics believe Trump supporters should be saying.
-Jut
I forgot until a few minutes that I had a Substack account and could read the entire Mersault post sequence, plus I could comment on the post. Here’s my comment…
I’m glad I took a screenshot of that comment, it appears to have been deleted. I’m shocked that this troll would delete something that challenged his narrative, SHOCKED!
I’m now blocked from commenting on that Substack post. I’m, shocked, SHOCKED!
NOTE: I’ve been wading through the comments on that Mersault post and I haven’t found even one comment yet that doesn’t appear to be within Mersault’s ideological bubble.
As far as I’m concerned, Mersault is a psychological snowflake that can’t support the bull shit he writes, he’s shown me that he’s a liar and a sniveling rhetorical coward that can’t stand the heat in the kitchen.
I wadded through all the comments in that thread and, as I expected, there weren’t any comments opposing or challenging what Mersault wrote. Here’s a sampling of the the things I read in the comments, remember these are quotes…
Talk about an ideological bubble!
There were 195 comments.
Logical Choices: Either the article written and presented as fact by Mersault is true or it’s fiction.
Condition 1: If the article written and presented as fact by Mersault is completely true, then the evidence within the article, in the words written by Mersault, proves beyond a shadow of doubt that Mersault is a calculated liar and a very dishonest and untrustworthy person.
Condition 2: If the article written and presented as fact by Mersault is completely false, aka fiction, then the article itself being fiction and being presented as fact proves that Mersault is a calculated liar and a very dishonest and untrustworthy person.
Logical Conclusion: Mersault is a calculated liar and a very dishonest and untrustworthy person.
I am beginning to think YOU are Mersault! Why, Steve, WHY?
😎
11 MAGA loyalists and ONE mole? Maybe 12 moles. If one TDS activist can sneak into a focus group, who’s to say that 11 others didn’t also? He’s not UNIQUELY dishonest, I suspect.
Yeah… A investigative blogger of such the extreme paranoid introvert type that *pronoun* must hide *pronoun*’s own identity from *pronoun*’s readers, yet infiltrated the enemy, intentionally blew *pronoun*’s own cover, and then spilled enough details about the infiltration that any single participant can locate the published article and then doxx *pronoun*.
Doubtful. I don’t even think a GOP focus group would have gatekeepers quizzing voters for ideological purity. That kind of things only leads to bias, and bias makes you write lousy heroic egoist fantasy fiction.
NOTE FROM JACK: I’m in a mass tech breakdown and without access to a computer. Please post a comment or two noting that I’m not dead and will be back posting ASAP?
Much appreciated, SW… give our regards, prayers, and best wishes to Mr. Marshall, if you’d be so gracious.
I suggest a fund to buy him an Apple (Mac) system. An iMac, a MacBook and an iPhone.
That’s a tall order Alizia.
Start with the MacBook Pro (?)
I thought the computer he is using now was acquired from a go fund me effort by you actually. Am I remembering that incorrectly?
That 2020 GoFundMe drive was raising dollars to donate to Jack in hopes that he could purchase a computer with it.
I guess I should have also written that, yes, he did purchase a computer with dollars from that GoFundMe fund raiser.
You need both an iMac (Desktop) and Macbook (Laptop)? I guess I have no room to talk; I just counted the computers in my home and we have 6: 2 HP Laptops with Win11, 2 iPads, 1 Ubuntu Linux and 1 Zorin OS (Linux). I even had a MacBook Pro but hated it and gave it to a friend who in turn gave it to his granddaughter. Anyway, TMI.
He must MUST! have the option of taking a laptop to Starbucks (or a non-Zionist but pro-American alternative).
As an IT professional with 17 years of database, programming, networking and help desk experience, I will admit that I used to believe that computers were solely deterministic tools. However, I have found numerous situations in which a user encountered technological breakdown all day until I literally stood next to their computer and the problem vanished.
I now believe that there are some people blessed with working technology. And, there are some cursed with broken technology. Even the working tech they buy is somehow broken. Jack may be cursed as it seems he is always playing whack-a-mole with this sort of thing.
Perhaps starting a bet on Polymarket as to his current problem would be in order. My bet would be Verizon.
There are enough Catholics on this blog so maybe they can put in the word to Fr. Chad Ripperger …
Is he the Catholic equivalent of a “Witch Doctor”? Maybe Jack’s technical problems are just a curse (rather than demonic) and a Witch Doctor might be more effective?
My sister has endless problems with her computer. She also swears that I have but to come in and stand by the pc to cure the problem.
She is not necessarily wrong . . . .
This phenomenon has been a part of automotive repair for as long as I can remember (I’m 81). “Click and Clack” had a radio show on PBS on this very topic; cars, not computers. A law perhaps: :When in the presence of someone who might fix it, the problem will not present.”