3. It shouldn’t matter. Blanche is still a disgrace. Today we learn that acting AG Todd Blanche promised that the Justice Department was rejecting the unethical “settlement agreement” President Donald Trump reached with the IRS earlier this year. Lane Duck Senator Cornyn, who had pledged to block Bamche’s nomination to become Trump’s official Attorney General, announced in a X post that documents posted by Blanche meet the Texas Republican’s demands to nullify the obscene $1.8 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund” and reject the even more disgusting IRS audit immunity deal for the President and his family. Even a single GOP defection in the Senate could cost Blanche the nomination, says Politico.
Ethics bulletin: EVERY Republican Senator should vote against Blanche. That he would have ever approved Trump’s unethical, self-dealing, conflict-of-interest soaked “settlement” is irrefutable proof that he is a sewer-dwelling political hack, an unethical lawyer, and an embarrassment to the rule of law, government ethics, the Justice Department and the nation. So is any Senator who doesn’t stand up and protest this nomination.
4. From the “Res Ipsa Loquitur” files, brainless DEI, Pro-Trans Gibberish Division: this stunning idiocy from the head coach of the WNBA’s Golden State Valkyries is magnificent. For some reason the video wouldn’t embed (%$#@!! WordPress!). But do watch the fool. It is, of course, another chapter in the accelerating Sophie Cunningham Ethics Train Wreck.
5. Ethics Hero: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Wow, how I loved this. In August of 2024, when the Axis news media was unconscionably trying to keep a Democratic President in the White House despite the epic disaster that was Joe Biden, J.D. Vance made CNN’s Dana Bash look like the biased hack she is, and I wrote,
“It is the duty of [the Republican Part] to make it clear as crystal to the American public what the news media has become, and they can accomplish that if they are direct, articulate, and persuasive in flagging the hypocrisy and bias of Axis agents like Bash. The tradition of being respectful to TV news interviewers was once a valid one, but it has lingered on long after the mainstream media ceased to deserve respect. Trump calling them the “enemy of the people” was effective exactly the way Ronald Reagan’s similarly condemned labeling of the Soviet Union as an “evil empire” was, and for the same reason: it was true.Vance, Trump and every other Republican must have their facts straight and be prepared to make hacks like Bash look exactly as biased and dishonest as they are. It shouldn’t be difficult.”
Yesterday, Bash had Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. as a guest on “State of the Union.” Kennedy was better at bashing Bash than Vance:
DANA BASH: Here with me now is the Health and Human Services Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Thank you for being here.
ROBERT F. KENNEDY. Jr.: Thanks for having me.
BASH: Appreciate it. You have been placing nearly all the blame on the COVID pandemic and the way that the U.S. responded to it squarely with Dr. Fauci. But, of course, he worked for President Trump. Does President Trump also deserve some of the blame?
KENNEDY: Well President Trump, as you recall, wanted to end the lockdowns. I think the thing that did the most damage to our country was the lockdowns, lockdowns that shut down 3.5 million businesses in our country with no due process, no just compensation, all of our churches, closed our schools, and our children are still paying the price for that. And yet we had the worst outcome of any country in the world.
BASH: How so?
KENNEDY: We have the highest death rate from COVID of any nation on Earth.
BASH: Well, let me just say, because I have heard you say that before on the death rate from COVID. That’s not accurate, because public health experts say that there is a combination of factors that went into that, higher rates of chronic illnesses, which I know you would agree with, gaps to our health care system, and misinformation about vaccines.
KENNEDY: Yes, you just said what I said was inaccurate. What I said was accurate. We had the highest death rate from COVID of any…
(CROSSTALK)
BASH: Well, there are other countries that had higher, but go ahead.
KENNEDY: You can argue about why we had that. But you — nobody can tell you. I mean, we have — as you say, we have the highest chronic disease burden in the world. And Anthony Fauci was mismanaging the COVID pandemic and was doing it under the Biden administration. President Trump wanted to end the lockdowns. And, in fact, in Anthony Fauci’s diaries, he talks about how President Trump is calling him every day, trying to get him to reopen the country.
BASH: Yes, well, the lockdowns were done by governors. I mean, certainly, Anthony Fauci and the president had opinions, but the lockdowns were done by governors, and largely because — and largely because they were hearing they were hearing from hospitals saying that their ICUs were overrun and they needed some help while that was happening.
(CROSSTALK)
KENNEDY: Well, that’s not true. Dana, that’s just not true.
BASH: It is true.
KENNEDY: What you’re saying is not true. No, they were doing it because Anthony Fauci was telling them from the top, you need to lock down. There were ICUs that were empty all over the country, including in New York at the height.
BASH: I’m asking you — I’m going to go back to what I asked you at the beginning, which is President Trump. And he was the guy in charge. And he — you tweeted back in 2024 that he let bureaucrats like Anthony Fauci shut down the entire country. Again, the president was in charge.
KENNEDY: The president was trying to reopen the country when he left. The country was kept closed for another year, almost a year-and-a-half after that.
BASH: Let’s talk about how to prevent the next pandemic, because there’s a lot of litigating and relitigating that I don’t think is really helpful to do with regard to COVID. And the question is about so-called gain of function, which, for people who aren’t entirely clear about it, it is a highly risky research process that includes manipulating a virus to study how it behaves as it evolves. Now, what scientists say is that, although it’s controversial, it’s necessary to prepare for the next pandemic, to get ahead of it, to figure out what these viruses can do. You want to end this gain of function research. Some scientists say, isn’t it better just to put better guardrails around it?
KENNEDY: People have been trying to put guardrails around it for generations, and it hasn’t worked. And, clearly, the COVID-19 pandemic and many other global pandemics that we have, have come from data function research. The RSV epidemic that we have that is the biggest killer of kids in this country today came from these kind of experiments. The Lyme Disease almost certainly came from this kind of research.So — and the scientists who you say are experts are making the argument that this is necessary for pandemic response cannot point to one instance in history where research that came out of this kind of experimentation has actually provided us something beneficial.
BASH: So, how do you prepare then? How do you prepare for the next pandemic? I mean, that’s literally part of your job now, because experts think it’s going to happen within the next 10 years again.
KENNEDY: Yes, I mean, I think we did virtually everything wrong the last time.
BASH: So — but what about now?
KENNEDY: The principal thing that we need to do is, we need to listen to what’s happening to doctors on the ground. There are 15 million frontline physicians around the world. They’re mainly now connected through the Internet. We can tell on the front lines what’s working and what’s not. If we had listened to those doctors during the COVID pandemic, we would have saved potentially millions of lives. There were therapeutics out there that were working. There were doctors that were having no deaths from COVID and treating in some cases thousands of patients.And we weren’t listening to them. Instead, we were doing the opposite. We were shutting them down. And then, Dana, the other thing that I would say is that we need to protect our constitutional rights. That is the primary obligation of our country.
BASH: What does that mean?
KENNEDY: Well, during COVID, we completely dismantled our constitutional rights. We began censoring people, in violation of the First Amendment.
(CROSSTALK)
BASH: But you’re saying what not to do. I’m asking what to do. But I- but I want to talk about…
KENNEDY: Well, that’s something to do. That is the number one priority. We protect the Constitution. The Constitution was written.
BASH: Forgive me, but you’re just — you’re talking about rights, and I’m asking about a potential public health crisis that is coming. But I do want to — let’s…
KENNEDY: And one of the mistakes we made in the last time was suppressing those rights so people weren’t being heard. Doctors who were saying you’re doing it wrong were being marginalized and vilified and…
BASH: Yes, because — because — again, I really want to move on. But you were saying you were…
KENNEDY: Of course you want to move…
BASH: Yes, I do.
KENNEDY: … because you were part of the problem.
BASH: No, I wasn’t part of the problem.
KENNEDY: There was absolute press malpractice. You weren’t allowing — your job…(CROSSTALK)
BASH: Mr. Secretary, your job…
KENNEDY: Your job is a fierce skepticism toward authority.
BASH: OK. Yes, I am. I am.
KENNEDY: And you weren’t doing that. You were beating up on people who were dissenting.
BASH: My job is also — no, OK. Are you going to — you want to sit here and attack me, or do you want to have conversations about public health?
KENNEDY: Well, you’re sitting here and attacking me.
BASH: I’m not attacking you. I’m asking questions about how to prevent the next pandemic.
KENNEDY: And let me answer the question. And I will tell you.
BASH: That’s what I’m trying to do. But I also don’t want to use this interview to allow you to say things that aren’t entirely true. You’re talking about therapeutics. Fine. It is also factually true that the COVID vaccine worked. The COVID vaccine prevented deaths. There is data upon data upon data. Let’s talk about the measles, please, because this is something that is happening as we speak. The cases in the U.S…
KENNEDY: You think the COVID vaccine protected children?
BASH: I think that what I have talked to scientists and doctors about…
KENNEDY: You have talked to scientists. Can you look — can you show me one study…
BASH: Yes, I can. I can.
KENNEDY: … that shows that children were protected by the COVID vaccine?
BASH: I can tell you that there are…
KENNEDY: That that vaccine did more good than harm to children? Can you show me one study that shows that?
BASH: I can tell you that, when it comes to the vaccine, there have been studies that show that, because of vaccine disinformation, disinformation, there could have been 100,000 to 200,000 in the U.S. saved But because people didn’t get the vaccine, that’s why.
(CROSSTALK)
BASH: I’m not saying that it entirely — let me finish. Let me finish.
KENNEDY: You are saying nonsense. You are saying something that you cannot show me a single study.
BASH: OK. I am not saying nonsense. I’m — excuse me.
KENNEDY: You are talking — somebody told you.
BASH: Excuse me. Let me…
KENNEDY: And you — cite me the study. What study?
(CROSSTALK)
BASH: No, what studies are you talking about? You’re talking about studies that actually don’t exist. I want to talk about the…
KENNEDY: Cite me the study. You’re talking about it.
BASH: I’m not here to defend…
KENNEDY: You say you have seen studies. Cite me the study.
BASH: This is not productive. I am not here to defend all of the — let me finish.
KENNEDY: You’re just — you’re talking nonsense. You’re making assertions you can’t support, and then when I call you on them, you’re telling me I’m arguing with you.
BASH: OK, do you want to talk about you want to talk about assertions that you can’t support? I will get there in a second. Let me just say, for the record, that I am not saying that the entire way that the COVID reaction was accurate. It was a scary time, and people made mistakes, absolutely. Let me finish.
KENNEDY: You were scaring people.
BASH: Why are you saying that?
KENNEDY: Because that was the job of CNN…
BASH: OK. OK, stop.
KENNEDY: … was to put the Chyrons up about many people are dying to get people to comply.
BASH: We were trying to be — we were listening to the leaders in this country, including the president, who had a daily press conference explaining what was going on, and trying to listen.
KENNEDY: Were you listening to the scientists, actually?
BASH: I want to talk to — measles.
KENNEDY: Were you reading the science yourself?
BASH: The measles cases in the U.S. just reached a 35-year high, the second record-breaking year in a row; 93 percent of these cases are among the unvaccinated. The outbreak is happening on your watch. And even before becoming HHS Secretary, for years, you have been one of the leading voices questioning the efficacy of vaccines. Do you accept some responsibility for this measles outbreak?
KENNEDY: Absolutely not. First of all, this is an international outbreak. So we’re doing better at handling it than any country in the world. Mexico has 15 times the amount of measles per capita that we have. Canada has four times the amount of measles. England has two times the amount of measles. Did I cause those measles outbreaks?
BASH: You’re the most famous…
KENNEDY: Did I cause 137,000 cases of measles in Europe?
BASH: You’re the most famous vaccine skeptic on the planet.
KENNEDY: Let me tell you, because actually Anthony Fauci in his diaries answers the question about why we’re having a measles outbreak right now. The reason we’re having a measles outbreak is because of the COVID lockdowns, because people didn’t — like, children during that period did not get vaccinated. And, in his diaries, he says this is going to cause massive outbreaks of measles and more children — he says this — are going to die.
(CROSSTALK)
KENNEDY: Let me finish, because you accused me of something. Now let me…
BASH: Go ahead. No, I didn’t. I asked you a question.
KENNEDY: Yes, let me give you the answer. He says in his diaries, more children are going to die from measles because of these lockdowns than COVID. So, if you want to know — and that age group that should have gotten the MMR when they were 18 months and didn’t get it, they’re the ones being infected. The people in this country — and we have stopped the outbreaks at record speed in South Carolina and Texas and Utah and Virginia. We have done better than any country in the world. I dispatched immediately the epidemic intelligence services to those states. I get on the phone with the governor, and we stop them in their tracks.
BASH: OK.
KENNEDY: Nobody else has been able to do that.
BASH: You have a bully pulpit.
KENNEDY: Let me tell you just one last thing.
BASH: Go ahead. Go ahead.
KENNEDY: The communities that are suffering from measles are almost all religious communities that just don’t vaccinate. The Mennonites have not vaccinated since 1796, since Edward Jenner invented the smallpox vaccine. It’s hard to blame that on me, as much as you want to blame it on me.
BASH: No, I don’t want to blame you. I’m asking you because you have a very powerful voice on these issues for people who are skeptical.
(CROSSTALK)
BASH: Let me finish. Let me finish.
KENNEDY: I have never questioned the efficacy of the MMR vaccine.(CROSSTALK)
BASH: OK, let me — let me finish. What I want you to do is please use your bully pulpit to right now, as we’re getting close to back to school, say — are you willing to say to parents who have not vaccinated their kids that they should vaccinate their kids for measles because it is safe and it will help them save their children’s lives?
KENNEDY: I tell people on my Web sites, my public…
(CROSSTALK)
BASH: Right now. Look into the camera.
KENNEDY: I will say it right now, that people — parents should get their children vaccinated for measles. A measles vaccine is effective. It stops measles in about 97 percent of the cases. So, people should get vaccinated.
BASH: Can I ask you? “The Wall Street Journal” reported that the president is pressuring you to conduct studies probing the link between vaccines and autism. Is that true?
KENNEDY: Did you say probing the link?
BASH: What “The Wall” — I’m just quoting “The Wall Street Journal,” that they, that the president wants you to go further to probe the links between autism and vaccines.
KENNEDY: He certainly does.
BASH: OK. Now, have you talked to him about medical research that have studied this for 25 years and found no link between autism and vaccines? And just that — this is my question here, because I don’t want to litigate that. My question is, why not — because you are HHS Secretary now. Why not study what could cause autism, which scientists do believe starts with fetal brain development? Why not do some studies on that, whether there’s — since you’re an environmental lawyer, whether there are environmental factors that go into contributing to a predisposed genetic situation?
KENNEDY: Well, let me say this first. We’re doing all those things. And that’s one of the ways that we found Tylenol. There’s 73 studies out that link Tylenol exposure during later pregnancy and during the perinatal period to autism onset.But you are wrong when you say that this issue has been studied. It has been studied. And you’re rolling your eyes, Dana, but this is another example…
(CROSSTALK)
BASH: I am, because I don’t want — I don’t want to have you use our air to say this. There have been more than 40 studies involving 5.6 million people to conclude there is no link between vaccines and autism. This is the head of the Committee of Infectious Diseases for the American Academy of Pediatrics.
KENNEDY: And now let me tell you what the Institute of Medicine is — says, which is the National Academy of Sciences, which is the ultimate arbiter on vaccine safety, in which it does not have an interest in this debate. It says that none of the eight vaccines that are administered during the first six months of life have ever been studied for relationship to autism. It found two studies, one on the DTP vaccine that show that it does cause autism, and one on the hepatitis B vaccine that again suggests that it does cause autism.The Institute of Medicine dismissed those two studies because they were based on CDC’s database. The studies that you’re referring to are all from one vaccine, the MMR vaccine, or one ingredient, thimerosal.
BASH: So you are using — you are actually looking at — you’re starting new studies to try to link autism, but you’re also telling me…KENNEDY: I’m not trying to link autism to anything. I’m trying to find out, why has autism gone from…
(CROSSTALK)
BASH: Are you also trying to find out how it interacts with people’s DNA, what’s predisposed to have an autistic child? Are you doing both?
KENNEDY: Yes. But, Dana, you probably don’t understand this because you’re not a scientist.
BASH: Well, you’re not either.
KENNEDY: But genes don’t cause — genes don’t cause epidemics.
BASH: I understand. Genes — epidemics?
KENNEDY: They can provide a vulnerability, but you need environmental exposure.
(CROSSTALK)
BASH: Environmental. That’s what I’m asking. Are you studying the environmental exposure?
KENNEDY: We’re looking at all the different environmental exposures. But your statement — you have been fooled. Your statement that this has been studied is not true. It’s categorically not true, not for any of the study.
(CROSSTALK)
BASH: It is considered decided.
KENNEDY: Considered by who?
BASH: By every scientist who has studied this.
KENNEDY: That is not true.
BASH: It is true.
KENNEDY: I can give you hundreds of scientists who have looked at this and say, why is the…
(CROSSTALK)
BASH: So, on the one hand, you are — do you understand why people aren’t getting…
(CROSSTALK)
KENNEDY: This is the National Academy of Sciences. What greater authority do..
(CROSSTALK)
BASH: Do you understand why people are not getting measles vaccines? Because they’re hearing you say that it could cause autism.
KENNEDY: You’re trying to change the subject.
BASH: I’m not. It’s very much related.
KENNEDY: And, look, show me one of the studies that’s been done on the first eight — the vaccines during the first six months of life. You will not find them. The National Academy of Sciences states they do not exist.
BASH: So, if that’s the case, then why are you telling people to get the measles vaccine?
KENNEDY: If people — because that is one of the vaccines that has been studied.
BASH: OK.
KENNEDY: It’s the only one that has been studied.
BASH: Do you want people to get the MMR vaccine?
KENNEDY: Yes, I said that already.
BASH: OK.
KENNEDY: So I know you’re flustered now, and it is…
BASH: I don’t — I’m not flustered at all.
KENNEDY: It is frustrating because people…
(CROSSTALK)
BASH: I am frustrated. The reason I’m frustrated is because I — you are the HHS Secretary, and you are talking about things that lead to vaccine hesitancy in this country. And it is something that causes problems for people, when there is not anything…
(CROSSTALK)
KENNEDY: Let me ask you something. Do you see your job as ending vaccine hesitancy, or do you see your job as telling the truth to the American people?
BASH: I see my job as telling the truth. And the truth is that there is study after study after study. It’s one of the most studied things out there in science.
KENNEDY: You’re repeating it like a parrot. You’re repeating it like a parrot.
BASH: So are you.
KENNEDY: I have actually read the science. Let’s…
(CROSSTALK)
BASH: You don’t want to…
KENNEDY: Let’s you and I come back here and debate the science.
BASH: I don’t — I’m not debating this with you.
KENNEDY: Of course you won’t.
BASH: No, because I’m not…
(CROSSTALK)
KENNEDY: All you know how to do is repeat things that people told you and say, trust the experts.That’s what you did during COVID. Now we know that Anthony Fauci, who was the expert, was lying about everything, about masks, about the social distancing, about natural immunity, about the transmission from the vaccine, about the source of COVID. He was lying, and you were punishing people for not trusting the experts. And now you’re rolling out the experts again…
BASH: Yes.
KENNEDY: … to talk about something that you have no personal knowledge of.
BASH: OK. Well, guess what? That is my job to talk to people.
KENNEDY: Your job is to tell the truth to the American public…
BASH: Am I allowed to talk? Yes, yes. And my job is to get as much information as I can.
KENNEDY: … and to maintain a posture of fierce skepticism toward government authority.
BASH: What we were doing in COVID and still, with regard to these vaccines, is getting the best information, the best science that we can and putting it out there. And, sir, you what you are doing is causing information to be out there that is not accurate.
(CROSSTALK)
KENNEDY: … lying to you, who is lying to you.
BASH: The National Academy of Sciences, which you just cited, in November, said: “We support the statement that vaccines do not cause autism.” This is the National Academy of Sciences that you just talked about.
KENNEDY: The National — look at the National Academy of Sciences’ most recent report.
BASH: OK.
KENNEDY: And you will see.
BASH: I don’t — I want to ask you one other question because it’s something that really did help Donald Trump get elected, and that is the MAHA movement and specifically the question of processed foods.
KENNEDY: Of what?
BASH: Processed foods and the fact that people want to feel that their food is safe. My understanding is that you’re pushing for reforms on food safety and ultra-processed foods that have been slowed, in some cases blocked by people in the administration who are working on behalf of the industry. Is that true?
KENNEDY: No, that is not true.
BASH: So you feel that you will be able to get these reforms done without any problems?
KENNEDY: I think the GRAS — the two big reforms that you’re probably talking about is ultra-processed food definition…
BASH: Exactly.
KENNEDY: … and the GRAS standards.
BASH: Yes.
KENNEDY: And they have both gone through extensive interagency process. I’m very confident that we will get them both out there within probably a month.
BASH: Well, I’m sorry that this — and that’s good news for people who are very — moms, and I’m one of them, who are very worried about making sure that our kids eat food and we eat food that is that is healthy. I’m sorry that this turned into a very contentious conversation, and my job is to try to get the best information out there. And it does concern me when you come in and say things that have — I…
(CROSSTALK)
BASH: Yes, people who have scientific backgrounds, and who I know have tried to talk to you as well. Thank you for coming in.

Newsbusters has posted that. Even if you disagree with Kennedy on some issues, the exchange emphasizes how “journalists” practice partisan and progressive advocacy while pretending to “tell the truth to the American public,” which is, as RFK Jr. correctly said, is their real job, if journalism were ethical any more.
________________
** (Inside joke)
You could always just put a donation button on the page. That is what Althouse does. Or have something like a patron that allows exclusive access. Not sure either of them will generate lots of money, but at least it’s something.
4. It was…very cringeworthy to watch. Bash should be embarrassed. But people will defend it anyway.
Fixed. Thanks, and also thanks for cuing my Ken Jennings rant.
I have a weird tendency to forget or mangle the names of celebrities and public figures who annoy me, and Jennings is a classic of the breed. He’s crummy game show host; he has the screen presence of a scrub brush, and is a blight on the legacies of Art Fleming and Alex Trebek. He’s barely passable, but being a trivia champion doesn’t make you a qualified TV host. “Blossom,” Mayim Bialik, in contrast, was a very competent co-host. She was dumped permanently for being too Jewish (she supports Israel’s right to exist). The show had a colorable cover story, but it was pretty clear at the time why she was being let go. If Jennings had any scruples, he would have supported her. Nah. All he cares about is trivia, so I consider getting his name right as trivia.
They botched that whole new host selection. The year-long program of endless guest hosts culminating in the producer assuming the mantle before being canceled really shook things up after the loss of Trebek.
I thought Aaron Rodgers did a decent job. Levar Burton might have gotten better in time, but he was so clearly nervous during his gig. They should have brought someone in alongside Trebek while he was ill and prepped that person for replacing him so the transition was more smooth.
About monetizing the blog…
I honestly don’t think “monetizing” is necessary; however, you could offer readers and commenters the opportunity to make a “free will donation” via PayPay or something similar. I created the following as an example of what it could look like…
You can see it on the right side of my blog just below the Archives drop-down box, I’ll leave it there for a week or so so you can check it out. No, I’m not really looking for donations to my blog, but that is a method of allowing others to donate any increment of $1 that they choose. You could choose to make that any increment of $10, or something else if you like, $1 seemed intuitive.
As far as I know, this free will donation idea really isn’t “monetizing” the blog.
And that’s why my critics rejected it. I charge $750 an hour. That’s $821,250 of unbillable time in a year. Substacks charge a real fee, and the writers don’t provide a 10th of the content I do. That was the argument I was facing.
This out of the box thinking might be way out in left field; but…
You already have a long history as a live performer, director, ethics performer, ethics teacher, ethics writer, etc, etc… Why not lump all those things together into one thing that can essentially mirror what you’re already writing on Ethics Alarms? Create a daily Ethics Alarms podcast (vlog) that is monetized right out of the gate and talk about the same things that you write about on Ethics Alarms but you could go into a little more depth. Your Ethics Alarms posts could basically be an outline, of sorts, to help guide you talking on a podcast.
There are lots and lots of people out there that listen to podcasts, both audio-only and video productions, and they pay to listen. Ethics Alarms blog and Ethics Alarms vlog. It could be an untapped market to monetize for you.
There’s my strenuous out of the box thinking for the day, now I’m completely drained and need a long nap. 😉
Good idea, Steve. And, a little gentle humor here, a podcast would be less likely to have typos. 😉
A M Golden wrote, “…a little gentle humor here, a podcast would be less likely to have typos.”
LOL!!!
However, unedited staring off in the distance brain farts will be in-your-face. 😉
There are two elements of absolute cognitive dissonance the left has to apply to their hatred of men. Leftist women will go on and on talking about how dangerous men are. Not all men, of course, but enough me. So much so that they’d rather pick a bear to meet in the woods than a man. They’re scary and dangerous and make women uncomfortable by their mere presence. They can’t be trusted because men are lying predators.
Except if that man says he’s a woman. No lying predator man would pretend to be trans for easier access to women and / or children. Some men are lying, evil predators who would try anything to victimize women. Except THAT. That one claim is magical, transmogrifying person born a man into a safe woman. Saying otherwise is TRANSPHOBIC.
Except if that man is entering a western country without legal authorization from said country’s government. Being a man raised where ill treatment of women is normalized is fine, as long as he’s not white. Any white man is an embodiment of the patriarchy. But non-white men raised where women and even young girls are just property to be used and abused for the whims of men? Eh, they also transmogrified the process, becoming safe for women. Saying otherwise is RACIST.
me ==> men
Bonus points for the “Calvin & Hobbes” reference! Very subtle, indeed.
I had a conversation with a young lady on a plane the other day. She was convinced that “trans” people are exactly what they say they are, that gender is fluid and non-binary. So, I asked her if the same rules apply to racial or ethnic identities. She seemed to think they did. I, then, said that “I identify as a 6 foot 8 inch African American male, with athletic skills including averaging 30.1 points per game, a 49.7 field goal percentage, 83% free throw average, and 1072 total games played. Given that rubric, I identify as Michael Jordan. Does that make me Michael Jordan?” She had no answer.
So I asked if the same rules applied to species. I said, “If so, I identify as a stocky, greyish furred mammal found in the South Sahara Desert in savannah and semiarid regions, weighing about 145 pounds, measuring 7.2 feet long (snout to tail), with an elongated snout, reduced eyes and long ears, hooved feet, and a diet consisting mostly of ants and termites. Does that make me, in fact, an aardvark?” She laughed at my silliness and turned her attention to phone screen.
jvb
Bravo, Matthew. This is exactly what they are claiming. There are heterosexual men out there who catfish women in order to scam them for money, claim to be 14-year old boys in order to groom teenage girls, put a flashing light on their vehicle and produce a fake badge when they pull someone over. They pretend to be devoted coaches, teachers, clergymen and counselors to get access to victims. Ted Bundy put on a sling and pretended to be injured to get victims.
The idea that it is impossible for a heterosexual male to pretend to be a woman in order to gain access to female spaces is ludicrous, especially if he isn’t even required to dress the part.
There are also men who catfish other men to scam them. I bought time share property a few years ago. The owners are regular targets of romance / blackmail scams. They usually older, wealthy men that own them, making them natural targets. The scammers hire middle age women to be their bait. They actually hire them to go from resort to resort and take a few pictures. The scammers then post on social media for each resort and start targeting men.
They’ll ask married men to sext and send incriminating photos, which the scammers then use to blackmail. For the widowers or divorced, they use the romance scam. The fools think it is some attractive woman, while the person they’re actually communicating with is actually some sweaty, harry dude in Pakistan.
#2
Holy crap!!! I wouldn’t use a restroom or locker room if that man were anywhere near. Folks who are actually afflicted with gender dysphoria are not well served by such representation.
Kennedy exposed Bash’s incompetence / malfeasance, but as usual he overstates. There is strong evidence against MMR, thimerosal-containing vaccines, or the routine infant/child vaccine schedule collectively causing a substantial fraction of autism. There is not equally strong direct evidence for every individual infant vaccine–autism pairing, and very small effects or effects confined to rare susceptible subgroups cannot be ruled out epidemiologically. An association between on vaccine might show something. But here are three reasons for NOT expending a great number of resources on that latter issue:
Large studies of the entire schedule or cumulative antigen exposure have found little or no association with autism.
Now, after many large studies have failed to find moderate or large effects for the overall vaccine schedule, including MMR, the prior probability that one remaining routinely used vaccine has a clinically important effect is considerably lower.
Resources are finite.
Incidentally, Andrew Wakefield once borrowed my desk and computer when I worked in Europe. Shady guy. RFK Jr. seems shady, but in a more Idée fixe way. Still shady. But Bash is a self-serving idiot.
Regarding the subscription fee, I’d keep the blog free, but I’d charge some of these commenters $1.00 per word. West and Gordon, $2.00 per word. Alizia Tyler, $5.00 per word. Me… $10 per word. Witherspoon and Grandma, no charge.
1. Thanks for the laugh; I needed that. paying by teh word would caese me a conflict of interest: I’d be tempted not to tell Alizia to stuff the anti-Zionist propaganda and paeans to fellow Nazis.
2. I think RFK is more than a little cracked regarding autism and vaccines, but that’s really not what was excellent about his confrontation with Bash. This is:
KENNEDY: Of course you want to move…
BASH: Yes, I do.
KENNEDY: … because you were part of the problem.
BASH: No, I wasn’t part of the problem.
KENNEDY: There was absolute press malpractice. You weren’t allowing — your job…(CROSSTALK)
BASH: Mr. Secretary, your job…
KENNEDY: Your job is a fierce skepticism toward authority.
BASH: OK. Yes, I am. I am.
KENNEDY: And you weren’t doing that. You were beating up on people who were dissenting.
kawaii65c843be72 wrote, “Witherspoon… no charge.”
My words have no value, I’m devastated. 😉
Youtube shorts and a smattering of longer form ethics monologue videos with a captivating delivery might build attention or a following for automatic monitization there. Who knows, maybe you become big enough and renowned for your typos that Ben Shapiro offers you a deal over at the Daily Wire. Ethics can be entertaining, right?
RFK spouted so many falsehoods it’s hard to keep up but the US didn’t have the highest death rate (not even top 5), and his Lyme disease origin comment is also false. He’s an embarrassment.
True, the U.S. doesn’t even rank in the top 10 for COVID mortality, and Ötzi the Iceman had Lyme disease. He kept harping on about “reading the science” which is ironic. RFK Jr. arguing with Dana Bash is like watching two pre-programmed made-in-China robots throwing wild punches at each other and hitting themselves instead.
Irrelevant to the post. He correctly told an Axis media mouthpiece that she and her cronies were complicit in Fauci’s deceptions and disastrous advice. And she immediately slipped into advocacy mode.
Couldn’t disagree more. You can’t trust someone who can’t get basic facts about reality right, especially when it comes to their job.
The news media’s #1 job is to convey facts. The Sec.of Health’s job is to improve the nation’s health as he or she sees it.I agree with those who find RFK’s anti-Vax obsession as disqualifying for someone in his position, that wasn’t the topic of the interview or the post. She tried to deflect to the vaccination issue to avoid accountability: he is 100% correct that the news media deliberately or negligently det out to panic the public and get them to accept vaccines that had not been properly tested and that were inappropriately forced on children. Ironically, RFK’s anti-vax bias is supported by the Wuhan botch.
You just wrote that the RFK’s job is health “as he or she sees it.” That exempts him from accuracy by definition. If the media’s job is conveying facts…then the official whose statements determine whether parents vaccinate owes accuracy at least as much, if not more. He has more power over the outcome and no editor above him.
I’m not defending Bash or Fauci. My point was smaller…RFK said the US had the world’s highest COVID death rate and that Lyme disease came from a lab. Both false, both about his own expertise. That’s not off topic when the post’s premise is that he was the one being truthful
It is indeed irrelevant to the post. RFJ Jr. was correct: they were complicit in the deceptions and they have blood on their hands. But RFK Jr.’s assertion would be that much more compelling if he ditched the clown suit.
Now I REALLY don’t understand your comment. What does “clown suit” signify in this instance?
Ben noted that falsehoods taint the entire message and the messenger. It’s difficult to trust someone who’s juggling falsehoods and throwing them at the audience like buckets of confetti. Unwisely perhaps, I reduced that to a single image. Nonetheless, there is a comic-tragic lack of seriousness underlying RFK Jr.’s most serious performances. Unlike Ben, I don’t reject everything the man said in that one, but I note the powerful temptation to do so.
As do I.