Here’s Ann on her substack (of course she has a substack) still pounding away on “The Great Replacement” theory:
Americans see videos of thousands of Muslims marching through London and Paris, and say, Europe is finished. Shocked at the unassimilable cultures being dumped on them, Europeans imagine no one has ever suffered so much.
So it’s unanimous. The U.S. is so lucky to have Hispanic immigrants instead of Muslims!
The consensus opinion could not be more wrong. Europe has only just begun its experiment with “multiculturalism.” The U.S. is so far along on this journey, it would be a miracle for the country to survive another half century in any recognizable form.
In addition to being screwed by the sizable group of Americans always clamoring for cheap labor, the U.S. is uniquely screwed by its geography, as pointed out by Harvard professor Samuel Huntington twenty years ago. We are the only developed country that shares a border with a third world country—and that border is 2,000 miles long, protected by a picket fence. Moreover, the income gap between Mexico and America is greater than any other two contiguous countries in the world.
But why not cheer for the U.S. becoming another Mexico, as The Wall Street Journal does? Think of all that cheap labor!
Ethics Alarms 
I would like to ask our host Jack if “The Great Replacement” theory as applied to Europe is basically correct, based on the religion and cultural attitudes of the immigrants.
My second question is why “The Great Replacement” does not apply to the hordes of illegal immigrants who swamped the US borders during the Biden administration? Do those illegal immigrants represent the average population of Latin American countries? Or is the criminal element overrepresented? Hereby I think about Venezuela’s tactic to dump their prison population onto US soil. Kilmar Abrego Garcia may better represent illegal immigrants than the many Hispanics (including legal immigrants) serving in the US military.
One motive behind illegal immigration keeps popping up. The Democrat Party want a new and better electorate, with strong constituencies that keep them in power forever. Illegal immigrants are such a constituency. This is also why Democrats want to keep the election process insecure, with mail-in ballots, vote harvesting, and no ID required.
Liberals (or shall I say socialists) in both Europe and USA subscribe to multiculturalism and globalism, have a diminished view of Western Civilization and the Judeo-Christian tradition, and are low on patriotism and nationalism.
I am all in favor of legal immigration, with a proper vetting process. Uncontrolled mass immigration as we are seeing in Europe and as we have seen under the Biden administration makes people uncomfortable, and one of the reason is that many of these immigrants (or asylum seeker or whatever you want to call them) make people uncomfortable. That is because on average this contingent of immigrants do not represent the best humanity has to offer. And people who are willing to say that aloud are being called a racist. And “racist” is a term that has been devaluated to almost zero due to overuse. The outcome of the 2024 Presidential elections demonstrated how powerless the term “racist” has become. Half the population stops listening when somebody uses the term “racism” to make a point.
We may not share Ann Coulter’s or Pat Buchanan’s values, and express our displeasure about their values by tossing around terms like “racism”. What matter is whether they are correct on the facts. Has immigration provide a net benefit to the USA in the last decades? Can we break that down by country of Origin and ethnicity, and ask whether immigration of Somali’s and Haitians have provided a net benefit to the USA in the last decades? Or people of Latino descent. Are we allowed to ask these questions, without being hampered by racial taboos?
Yes, except again, this is Hanlon’s Razor at work in Europe. They weren’t trying to turn Europe Muslim, they just were too stupid to realize that’s what would happen.
The GRT originated as a trope against legal immigration. It was at heart racist, because it predated such Biden era idiocy like allowing an undigestable mass of Somalis or Haitians to move into small midwestern towns.
The problem isn’t color. Coulter keeps coming back to that, jsut as Buchanan did, and people like her is why efforts to slime opponents of open borders as “xenophobic” are still effective.
i would take 100 legal hispanics over 1 muslim, legal or illegal