House Cleaning: Mystery Solved (Maybe)…The Identity Of EA’s Current Banned Anti-Semite Commenter Has Been Revealed!

Welcome to my world.

While you may think I spend my Ethics Alarms hours researching every imaginable source for interesting stories with ethics lessons to teach and then writing posts, and then responding to as many comments on the post as possible (70,000 such responses so far), which I believe makes me unique among bloggers with the number of commenters that I have. I also have to deal with the annoying task of blog moderation. That onerous and icky job is made more so when I am forced to ban a commenter for violating the clearly stated comment policies; it get particularly annoying when a banned commenter keeps finding ways to sneak in comments anyway post-banning, which almost all of them do, validating my judgment that they don’t have the ethical compass necessary to contribute here.

The most recent comment-bomber has been virulent anti-Semite Cassandra’s AI Agent, who hasn’t come close to the record number of unauthorized comments as the pompous A Friend, but it’s early yet. In the most recent spammed comment, which CAA posted at least three times, he/she/or it claims to be virulent anti-Semite Alizia Tyler, who was banned for using every topic to engage in her Jew-hating hobby. Many commenters had hypothesized that earlier, and I demurred, for several reasons. CAA has a different email address than Alizia, and unlike Alizia, doesn’t write like a bot, or as profusely. CAA is also an asshole, which Aliza was not. I’ve had off-site exchanges with Alizia in which I found her to be committed to being a productive commenter, even asking me whether I felt she should stop commenting in the best interests of Ethics Alarms.

If Alizia is in fact CAA, she’s clearly snapped. And because CAA is an unethical asshole, I can’t take anything he/she/or it says as necessarily true.

23 thoughts on “House Cleaning: Mystery Solved (Maybe)…The Identity Of EA’s Current Banned Anti-Semite Commenter Has Been Revealed!”

  1. Meaning of “Que te chingues” in Spanish slang

    “Que te chingues” is a vulgar Spanish expression that literally means “What the fuck are you doing?” or “What the hell are you doing?” but in practice it’s used to express annoyance, shock, or frustration, depending on tone and context.

    Having grown up among Cuban refugees in Miami in the ’60s, I’m familiar with the type. Hot headed chicks. Franco era fascists at heart. She could very well be Cuban American, or maybe Venezuelan. Loves strongmen. The Muslims occupied most of the Iberian Peninsula for quite a while. Scratch a Hispanic, you get an Islamicist.

    Thus spake a geriatric boomer sycophant

  2. If AT and CAIA are the same, I prefer the more direct writing style of CAIA. It’s much easier to follow. The the writing style of AT, while being appreciated for its distinctiveness here, was a bit to fluffy esoteric academic.

  3. though not a profusive commentator. I look forward to reading, pondering, your post and the commentators that follow. I occassionaly add short snippets of observation.

    Keep up the work! My gratitude!

    • Whoever it is seems to be having an old fashioned hissy-fit. I just spammed five more illicit, non-substantive, insulting comments. A few of the legit commentariate’s responses vanished with them. I think I’ve made it clear that we should not engage with Ol’ Nutball

        • The latest nonsense is crying “Censorship!” Too bad nobody can explain to Whomever that in isn’t “censorship” for a citizen to bar someone from using a blog as a platform for his, her or its rants and delusions. Twitter and Facebook are public fora, Ethics Alarms is not. I don’t think the Freedom of Speech thing is that complicated, but maybe it is. For some.

          • [From your host:This one is long but easily summarized: “I have no life.” I am genuinely sorry about that, but its not my problem.]

  4. Return of the strong Gods! Yikes! Like Franco and Mussolini? Fidel? Saddam Hussein? Mao? Hitler? Subtle? Like that? I don’t know whether you’ve been cancelled, but you’re clearly a lunatic. You’re messianic.

  5. Alizia Tyler aka Cassandra’s AI Agent the internet troll wrote, “The sycophants that surround you — Witherspoon the most notable — refuse to oppose your dictatorial tendencies because they sense that opposition is not allowed.”

    Like so many things this Alizia writes, this too is HOGWASH!

    I do like how she singled me out (she’s clearly psychologically obsessed with Jack and I) but it’s certainly not because I’m some kind of mindless “sycophant”, it’s because I didn’t pander to her and I pointed out her absurd trolling nonsense. Some things are worth repeating; one of the last things I wrote regarding what she wrote “I understand all sorts of things…” in one of her final comments before being banned…..

    Generally speaking, Alizia appears to be under the false impression that everyone is supposed to bow to her arrogant superiority complex.

    Hogwash!!! I think Alizia has proven the opposite over the years.

    It’s my opinion that Alizia understands very little outside of her metaphysical tunnel vision of the world around her. Alizia seems to write like a faux intellectual whos brain is obsessed with metaphysically questioning every raw reality that’s right in front of her face, then she proceeds to write Dunning-Kruger word salads integrated in gish gallop styled trolling comments and complains when people don’t grasp her point, whatever it may be. It’s as if Alizia thinks of herself as some kind of uniquely special contrarian whos intellect is so far above everyone else’s that she is above being questioned because everyone else is too damned stupid to understand her way of thinking.

    I think Alizia should find the philosophy professor(s) that triggered her uncontrollable metaphysical obsessions and sue them for everything they’ve got for their indoctrinating malpractice. Alizia could have been a productive member of society, but here we are dealing with an obsessed troll.

    I really wonder if this is the only blog site that Alizia actively trolls. Where does she go and what does she do when she’s not trolling here? I’ve got to believe that, as obsessed as Alizia appears to be, there’s got to be more.

    Alizia also wrote in the same thread, “You miss entirely the point I am making” to which I replied…

    Haven’t you figured it out after all this time, your points, whatever the hell they may be, are invisible to normal human eyes when they’re “blurred and muddied by piling on generalities, tangents, cosmic puzzles, dancing angels and navel-gazing exercises” (thanks Jack for that quote).

    One time she had the gall to change her moniker to this…

    I took a screenshot of it immediately so she couldn’t lie and say she didn’t do it after she quickly changed it to the fleur-de-lee.

    From all the written words and actions by Alizia/Cassandra, I’m fully convinced that she is a racist/anti-Semite and an obsessed internet troll and should be treated as such anytime she makes her morally bankrupt presence known. Alizia/Cassandra the internet troll has earned every word of ridicule.

    Don’t go away mad Alizia/Cassandra, just go away.

    This time, stay gone.

      • I think I pegged “A Friend” as an internet troll after reading two or three of the comments posted. When faced with an obvious duck, don’t hold back, call it what it is.

        Ever heard the phrase, “if you want an alcoholic to hit rock bottom so they can take a step towards self-awareness and recovery, then drive them to drink”. It’s a morally bankrupt thing to do to an alcoholic because of the possible consequences of their drinking but the same general thing can be said of internet trolls.

  6. Th writing styles don’t seem the same at all – I think Alizia and Cassandra are two people, despite efforts to make you think otherwise. Perhaps it doesn’t even matter – a troll is a troll.

    • Yes, I agree with that; I’ve found the styles different from the start. Then again, I would expect the real Alizia to email me to reveal the hoax, like Howard Hughes did to explode the Howard Hughes memoirs scam.

  7. I recall Alizia doing the “self-exile” thing for a while before coming back. I remember I took a leaf out of Extradimentional Cephelopod’s book in helping her be more persuasive. She responded with something along the lines of “I’m not trying to be persuasive.” I knew then that she was never interested in true learning and dialogue, only preaching her own point of view.

    I’ve been wondering though, why you gave her a time limit to apologize for her final insult. What difference would a day, a week, or more have made?

Leave a comment