By all means, let us, as Barack Obama sagely advises, have more women in leadership positions.
I guess that loony scene doesn’t entirely speak for itself. I have questions.
Can anyone imagine men behaving like this? Can anyone imagine trustworthy, rational women behaving like this?
What, exactly, are they screaming about?
What good do they think screaming will do?
Who suggested that screaming was the ideal way to support Lucy Craig, aka. “Jane Doe,” who is accusing seven men of sexual assault that took place two years ago after texting one of her alleged assailants that everything was consensual and signing a document that stated that no rape occurred?
After whoever it was suggested this brilliant and articulate protest, what kind of woman would react with, “Perfect! That’s exactly what needs to be done in the interest of justice!”?
Is it possible that the women above think that more viewers will think, “Hey, they make a good point! I’m convinced Lucy was raped!” than will conclude, “Women in this country have completely lost their minds!”?
And again: this is the constituency voters will be siding with when they vote for Democrats next month.
Yikes.
Is it too late(only 2 years not 30) for the seven guys to counter claim that they were raped by her? After all, having grown up under the specter of toxic masculinity they are full of shame at having to go public as being men and publicly admitting their weakness is humiliating.
I believe one the the accused has in fact filled a counterclaim along those lines.
I recall reading one of the guys is alleging she sodomized him and suing her! Hah!
In a society ruled by emotion, those with rational, objective intellects will be considered insane.
To actually respond to your questioms:
Can anyone imagine men behaving like this?
Betas if they are with their female handler.
Can anyone imagine trustworthy, rational women behaving like this?
No. But there is a reason real men are not doing this. But there has to be at least one “man” in the crowd of screamers.
Is it possible that the women above think that more viewers will think, “Hey, they make a good point!
Yes. This is what they consider substantive.
Based on the image I can only think that many of these women spend far too much time commiserating with each other over a half gallon of Chunky Monkey. They seem to be competing on who looks the frumpiest.
I cannot determine what they are upset about. Is it that they are unhappy they never get invited to parties, that Jane Doe was getting all the attention or are they really concerned about the issue at hand.
I know this all sounds sexist or misogynistic but it always seems to be the least attractive women having these scream fests. Perhaps if they focused on what is good in the world they might be a bit happier.
Women like this are occasionally making me reconsider my stance on the 19th Amendment.
I am glad a woman makes this statement, and not me.
Hundred years ago women were more conservative than men, and guardians of morality. Around the same time as the ratification of the 19th Amendment the 18th Amendment and the Volstead act were passed, banning the manufacture, sale, and transportation of intoxicating liquors. Also during that time brothels were closed, and prostitution was prohibited in most of the states except Nevada. Women were strongly in favor of these reforms.
Right up to the invention of modern methods of birth control (which was followed by the sexual revolution) women were the gate keepers of sexual morality, demanding that a man put a ring on it before any sexual activity took place.
Revoking the 19th Amendment is a non-starter, however men have noticed for a while now that the moral quality of the average women is not what it was compared to previous decades, resulting in declining marriage rates, and contributing to a dating crisis; many men simply walk away as “the juice is not worth the squeeze”.
In an ideal world, any claim, such as the one I made above would be considered and accepted/rejected on evidence no matter the sex of the claimant. That is not our society. I made that statement knowing that I am a woman and it might be considered more for that fact. I would lose out were we to cancel the 19th Amendment. And frankly, actions like this are probably less likely to lead to our disenfranchisement than the support for Lindsey Clancy. The Cornell 7 also needs to have its place in the Hall of Infamy and Lost Respect. Women (as a group) are proving that we are unfit for tasks which require us to put aside emotion and hormones and function in society. At no point do I want to be compared to these ladies, but the way they have defined society, I will be, simply because I have the same genitalia. Also, for challenging this, I am a traitor to my sex. Oh well…
I hear you, sister …