Friday Open Forum!

There should be a lot to write about today that I have missed so far.

Meanwhile, the Hackman demise mystery is more confused now than when I posted on it yesterday. The theories are getting really wild now: last night I heard an “expert” speculate that Hackman and his wife had simultaneous heart attacks.

I think we can officially conclude that the Hackmans did not kill their dog as part of a grand, planned exit, because two of the couple’s dogs are alive and well. Well, good. The post was primarily about the unethical practice of euthanizing healthy dogs “out of love.” (No one has yet suggested that the dogs conspired to rub out their masters, but the way the speculation is going, that theory may surface yet.

I always feel terrible when any well-loved and respected public figure has a final act that is embarrassing, lurid, pathetic or ugly. Often this means that the mess is remembered for than what went before, which was what mattered.

Do write something memorable for me today.

From James Carville, a Rationalization #22 Classic, and Ethics Dunce Infamy

For some reason, the Axis media and social media pundits have been resorting to interviewing retired, apparently unemployed, old Clinton political consultant James Carville as he slowly transforms into Gollum and says “fuck” a lot. Virtually all political consultants are soulless, ethics-free Machiavellians who would sell out their own mothers out for a rich contract; the successful ones aren’t stupid (unlike the consultants Kamala Harris apparently paid millions to), but they usually have nothing to teach us about ethics except from the “Don’t be like them!” perspective. Remember how Dick Morris, another Clinton consultant, suggested that Bill commission a poll on whether he should tell the truth about Monica Lewinsky?

[Digression: In a recent interview on the same “Call Her Daddy” podcast that Kamala chose to submit to instead of Joe Rogan’s, poor (not being sarcastic: I feel sorry for her and always have) Monica Lewinsky said that the “right way” for President Clinton to have handled the revelation of their liaisons would have been either “to resign” or find a way not to make her a national pariah. “I think that the right way to handle a situation like that would have been to probably say it was nobody’s business and to resign,” Lewinsky said, “or to find a way of staying in office that was not lying and not throwing a young person who was just starting out in the world under the bus.”

Comment for Monica: “Welcome to the party, pal!” Yet you sat back and let Hillary Clinton campaign as a feminist Presidential candidate while the Democrats cynically cheered themselves as “the party of women.” My sympathy for you stretches only so far…]

Seldom, however, do these unethical mutations of humanity who call themselves consultants come right out and express exactly how warped they are, as Carville does in this video on Rumble. He says, speaking about the issue of biological women participating in women’s sports,

“If you feel like that you have to protect these girls from, I’m not sure what — I don’t really fucking understand it or give a shit, but it’s a big goddamn issue to you, so, you got to be sure that you’re out there and ready to go. And, you know, whenever this topic comes up, I say, ‘Look, I’m sorry. I just don’t think a lot about track meets. I think a lot about people having affordable health care. I think a lot about how we can grow America. I think a lot about that they’re not going to be able to pass a debt limit, not even close, much less reconciliation, anything else.”

Nice. Women and girls losing to biological men in their athletic competitions, risking injuries, losing championships, scholarships and the experience of fairly run sports just isn’t as significant in the vast scheme of human events as the other concerns Carville mentions, so its not worth talking about or fixing.

That’s the essence of evil Rationalization #22, the worst on the list, which allows any conduct, no matter how harmful or wrong, to be brushed aside and rationalized away because “there are worse things.” From the description of #22. The Comparative Virtue Excuse: “There are worse thingsat the list,

“If ‘Everybody does it’ is the Golden Rationalization, this is the bottom of the barrel. Yet amazingly, the excuse is popular in high places. During the Iraq deabale in the Bush II administration, we heard the “Abu Ghraib was bad, but our soldiers would never cut off Nick Berg’s head!” argument. It is true that for most unethical misconduct, there are indeed “worse things.” Lying to your boss in order to goof off at the golf course isn’t as bad as stealing a ham, and stealing a ham is nothing compared selling military secrets to North Korea.”

You can try to excuse anything this way, and Carville’s favorite party is wearing out #22 of late. A particularly ridiculous extension of the rationalization was a recent Providence Journal story headlined,  “Numbers show RI undocumented immigrants a small slice of those getting benefits. What we know.

Reporter Katherine Gregg determined that Medicaid payments to those without Social Security numbers totaled $55.4 million last year, including the $16,106,050 paid to illegal immigrants. Then she shrugged off the wasted funds as just a tiny percentage of the Medicaid budget. This is apparently the Axis-ordered rebuttal for all of the Trump Administration spending cut efforts: why should we care about a few million or even a few billion here and there, while so much more is being wasted elsewhere?

Jeez, where’s Ben Franklin when you need him?

Carville’s #22 is even uglier because he frames it in human terms. Even though the invasion of trans men into women’s sports does measurable harm to identifiable children and adult athletes, puts girls and women at risk of injury, and savages a group that Carville’s party once pretended to care deeply about, it’s just not worth paying attention to because….health care is too expensive. His attitude can’t be justified as utilitarianism, because the integrity of women’s and girls’ sports isn’t part of a trade-off or a necessary sacrifice to achieve a greater good. It’s just not important enough, says Carville, to care about.

Yecchh.

A Brief Trump Derangement Ethics Note That I Would Write More About If I Had Time, But I Don’t…

Once again, I want to call on the commentariate and others to consider submitting guest columns to EA.

Today, as an example, I could have spent every hour writing posts on important ethics issues, but I can’t (I devoted too much time as it is) because I have difficult, time-consuming and perilous personal and business tasks swinging over me sword of Damocles-like, I have no staff or assistance now, and I’m feeling unusually pressured and anxious.

The Trump Derangement theme of the day which I would ideally be examining in more detail is the freakout over Elon Musk attending a Cabinet meeting today as if this is another assault on democracy by Donald J. Hitler. Established in Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution, the President’s Cabinet consists of advisors who oversee particular areas within the executive branch with the President’s consent and Congressional approval.

There is not a word in our founding document about how they should meet, if they should meet (pseudo-President Biden had almost no Cabinet meetings) or who else can attend if and when they met. The Cabinet could meet around a poker table. It could meet as a costume party. The President could tell one Cabinet member that he or she isn’t invited if he’s sick of looking at his or her face. Children have attended Cabinet meetings. Dogs have been invited.

As I noted at the time, Jill Biden attended a Cabinet meeting, and the same news outlets screaming about Musk being “unelected” and a “co-President” never uttered a peep of complaint.

These Trump Deranged obsessions are obnoxious, misleading, cheap, ignorant and apparently getting dumber by the day.

The YouGov. Poll: Maybe Americans Are Just Too Stupid and Unethical For Democracy to Survive After All…

All research indicates that the majority of Americans, not having the IQ’s of Pet Rocks, recognize that our bloated government is corrupt, inept and wasteful. Pew Research polling concluded that 56% of Americans felt that way last year. “Nearly 2/3 of Americans fear that our government is run by corrupt officials, stated another survey. In January, A.P.-NORC researchers found that 70% of Americans believe corruption in the federal government is a serious problem.

Despite these beliefs, only 39 % of Americans polled gave DOGE a “favorable” rating in the latest The Economist/YouGov poll, with”unfavorable” at 36%, and the human slugs who chose “don’t know” came in at a whopping 25%. Another poll this month found only 49% approving DOGE’s cost-cutting efforts.

Continue reading

Baseball Ethics: Technology, Decorum, Sportsmanship, Trust

Spring Training has begun, and that means the the baseball season in involved in its metaphorical overture. As usual, the game is already spawning ethical controversies, and they strike principles that apply to more spheres of human experience than just baseball.

Automated Ball-and-Strike System (ABS)

Finally! After a couple of years of being tested in independent and minor leagues, a system allowing computer-assisted ball and strike calling is being tested in Spring Training with an eye toward introducing it in MLB games in 2026. The way it current works: home plate umpires still call the pitches, but a batter, pitcher or catcher (not managers) can challenge a bad call. Once a challenge is made (right now the signal is the player tapping his helmet), the scoreboard shows where the disputed pitch was, and if it nicks the strike zone when the umpire said otherwise (or missed it and the ump called a strike anyway), the call is reversed. Each team has a set number of challenges: if one fails, it is lost.

The system injects new strategy and statistical analysis into the game. The challenged pitches shouldn’t all be on ball four or strike three calls, or even necessarily in game-determining situations. The statistical difference between the batting average of a batter having a one ball, one strike count and a batter with an 0-2 count is massive, so mid-count, early innings challenges can have major effects on a game’s outcome. Batters do not have as clear a view of the strike zone as pitchers and catchers, so the system favors the defense: presumably batters will be instructed not to challenge an umpire’s call unless a mistake is egregious. Running out of challenges by the late innings of a close game will be a significance handicap.

Interestingly, Terry Francona, now managing the Cincinnati Reds, has told his veteran players not to participate in the challenge system. He reasons that since ABS won’t be used during the 2025 season, it is a distraction from the purpose of Spring Training, which is to prepare for the games ahead. (He’s right.)

Goodbye Tradition, Hello Beards

Continue reading

Q: How Do I Maintain Respect For the Dozens of Facebook Friends Who Thought This Statement Was Profound? [Expanded!] [Expanded Again!]

Somebody with an acid pen and a facility with statistics please go crazy fisking that thing. I’m tired.

Here’s a short version, though…

  • It’s no “secret,” because literally no one without an internal head injury has ever blamed Social Security and Medicare for the National Debt.
  • The top 1% of taxpayers pay about 40% of all income taxes. Whether that’s “fair” is entirely a matter of values, opinion, and priorities. The lower half of the population in income barely pays any taxes at all, yet they derive the benefit of government services anyway. Why is that “fair”?
  • You can’t bring down inflation by increasing the costs of goods and services by taxing the companies that produce them.
  • “End of story” is what people say when they don’t have the facts, wit or ammunition to win an argument, so they declare the debate over before it starts. Similar sign-offs: “Period, the end!” “So there!” and “My mind’s made up, don’t confuse me with facts!”

ADDED: No sooner had I posted the above than an equally moronic (and spectacularly dishonest)meme was posted by a lawyer friend. The same question applies:

(Calvin should sue.)

ADDED: This one, posted by a very good friend who should be ashamed of himself, was “liked” or “loved” by almost 20 people so far. First reply: “It’s true.”

I had to physically wrestle my fingers to the floor to stop them from typing, “You all are despicable morons. Every one of you.”

Municipal Government Ethics Follies [Clarified]

Do you think the Federal and state governments have major ethics culture problems? Municipal governments say “Hold my beer!”

1. The city with the deadest ethics alarms in the U.S.? It might be Quincy, Florida…

Quincy hired Robert Nixon as its city manager. Now Quincy Commissioner Beverly Nash has called on the city commission to terminate Nixon, alleging the city violated its own guidelines and possibly state law by hiring him. Why, you well may ask?

Nixon had pleaded guilty to charges of embezzling government funds and served 21 months in prison. The 2010 criminal case was brought after Nixon and an accomplice schemed to pocket $134,000 in federal Housing and Urban Development grant money meant for Tallahassee-area small businesses. Nixon was the director of Florida A&M University’s urban policy institute when he stole from a grant fund-holding account at Florida A&M Federal Credit Union, where his co-defendant was president. The two tried to disguise withdrawals as consulting and administrative fees. They got caught red-handed.

Quincy has a population of about 8,000 and is located at the center of Gadsden County. “Technically we have gone astray and violated our own policies and procedures,” Nash said during a city commission meeting. “When adherence to policy slowly erodes, what is left? Wrong becomes right. The lines and boundaries are missing and blurred.”

The controversy is bogged down in a technical debate over whether or not it is illegal for Quincy to hire a convicted felon who has not had his right to hold official office restored. You can read the details of that irrelevancy here. It doesn’t matter whether Quincy can hire someone who had embezzled government fund as its city manager. Whether the city can or not, it is incompetent, irresponsible and stupid to do so. This is signature significance on metaphorical steroids. Nixon, predictably, is full of talk about redemption and second chances. “I had a debt to society and I paid it. I think it’s important that there is a pathway forward for people with felonies who want a second chance,” Nixon says. Sure there is a pathway: that path begins somewhere the felon does not have opportunities to steal his employer’s money.

The reality is this: nobody who is trustworthy embezzles government funds once or ever. Maybe a city could justify hiring a contrite former embezzler as its city manager after every candidate in the country who has not embezzled cash perishes from some China-planted ethics plague. Absent that unlikely scenario, the hiring is indefensible.

Here’s my favorite part of this astounding story: The Quincy city attorney was one of Nixon’s defense lawyers in the embezzlement case.

2. Oh no, flags again…

Continue reading

Amazing Stories of The Great Stupid: “Interracial Dating as a Sociopolitical Strategy”

This headline on a New York Times “The Ethicist Column” justly attracted mockery across the conservative media spectrum: “As a White Man, Can I Date Women of Color to Advance My Antiracism?” One could do a packed seminar on what’s wrong with that question. You can do whatever you want to do within the law. Whether you are white or not doesn’t change that fact. Dating to make a political statement rather than dating because you want to develop a personal, intimate, lasting relationship with someone else is a Kantian ethics violation, using a human being as a means to an end, thus demeaning and manipulating that person.

This is a victim of The Great Stupid, crying for help without realizing it. My favorites excerpts from the head-exploding letter to Prof. Kwame Anthony Appiah from”Name Withheld”(“a straight white dude and recent college grad who has very progressive beliefs and is looking for a committed partner who, in time, can equitably raise a family with me”):

Continue reading

Friday Open Forum

Everything is a chore right now: I’m sore all over and can hardly walk after falling down a flight of stairs in the dark at my sister’s house while looking for her dog to take to my house after she (my sister, not the dog) ended up in a hospital emergency room unexpectedly two nights ago.

So the more lively and provocative you are here, the happier I’ll be. And I’m still looking for guest posts: one is on the runway now.

Meanwhile, here’s a headline (on the ABA site) that I guarantee will be ripped off by “Law and Order” or some other TV show very soon: “Judge texted bailiff, clerk that he can’t be in court next day because ‘I just shot my wife,’ jurors are told.”