The Naked Teacher Principle: The Principle states that a secondary school teacher or administrator (or other role model for children) who allows pictures of himself or herself to be widely publicized, as on the web, showing the teacher naked or engaging in sexually provocative poses, cannot complain when he or she is dismissed by the school as a result.
_______________________________________________________________________

Ms. Webb, NYC school guidance counselor, circa 1995. Va-va-voom.
Tiffany Webb is, or was, a 37 year-old guidance counselor in the New York City public schools. She had excelled at her job for 12 years until photos she posed for as a 20-year-old lingerie model turned up on the internet. When a student showed photos of Webb that he had found online to her principal, it was recommended that she be fired. After an investigation, an Education Department committee voted 2-1 to do just that, concluding, ‘The inappropriate photos were accessible to impressionable adolescents. That behavior has a potentially adverse influence on her ability to counsel students and be regarded as a role model.”
Her firing came as she was scheduled to gain tenure. Naturally, she’s suing. I hope she wins, because while the committee’s rhetoric is in line with the sound reasoning behind the Naked Teacher Principle, the facts dictate that this is the point—and all rules have such a point point— where “ethics incompleteness” occurs and the rule, however valid it is the vast majority of the time, accomplishes unethical rather than ethical ends.
The Naked Teacher Principle doesn’t apply to Tiffany Webb because:
1. She is not naked, though the photos doesn’t leave much to the imagination, either. OK, forget #1. Continue reading →