Of Cheating, Loopholes, Fairness and Golf

One of the problems with assessing fairness in sports is that the definition  of “cheating” varies according to what game is involved.  In some sports, anything not specifically outlawed is fair. In other sports, the “spirit of sportsmanship” takes precedence over mere rules. Golf is one of the latter, a sport that still regards itself as refined and gentlemanly.  Now a controversy has erupted that requires an assessment of whether one can cheat in professional golf while obeying the rules.

PGA player Scott McCarron has accused PGA star Phil Mickelson of cheating for using a wedge with a banned design. The wedge in question is a Ping-Eye 2 wedge that has square grooves, and the PGA banned such grooves in favor of V-shaped grooves. The Ping people sued over this, and managed to wrangle a settlement out of the PGA that allowed their square-groove wedges to be used on the tour (though not in international tournaments) if they were manufactured before 1990. In other words, the old wedges were “grandfathered” in: once the 20 year-old clubs are gone, no more square grooves.

Mickelson apparently cruises E-bay, likes the square grooved wedges, found some and uses them.  There aren’t enough to go around, however, so he gets the advantage of the (supposedly) superior grooves while younger players have no choice but to play with the PGA-approved wedges. Is that fair?

It isn’t fair. It just doesn’t break any rules. The situation is reminiscent of  Major League Baseball’s banning of the spitball in 1920. The spitball specialists  were still allowed to continue throwing the pitch until they retired, though nobody else was. There is a difference, though: those pitchers had no choice but to keep throwing spitballs, because it was the only way they could continue to play.  Mickelson certainly doesn’t have to use the legal wedges with the illegal grooves.

It may be due to a loophole in the rules, but the Ping wedges are still legal in PGA events, and Mickelson isn’t concealing the fact that he uses them. Without deception or a rules violation, using the Ping wedges can’t be called cheating. McCarron is wrong, and he was wrong to use that term to attack a fellow golfer. Still, using the wedges when other players cannot is unfair.

Even Mickelson agrees that the exception to the ban is unfair. “But it’s not up to me or any other player to interpret what the rule is or the spirit of the rule,” he told reporters. “I understand black and white. And I think that myself or any other player is allowed to play those clubs because they’re approved — end of story.”

Sorry, Phil. That’s a rationalization. You have said allowing the banned wedges is “terrible,” and that suggests that you know it gives a player using them an unfair advantage. You’re not the only player who has one—John Daly and Dean Wilson also use the square groove Pings—but there aren’t enough to supply all your competitors. Nobody’s forcing you to take full advantage of a bad rule. Good sportsmanship dictates that you voluntarily use thefully legal V-grooved wedges. You don’t have to do it; it wouldn’t be cheating to keep exploiting the loophole in the rules. It’s just unfair to your fellow golfers.

In golf, the gentleman’s game, that’s bad enough. As a leader on the tour, Phil Mickelson has a special responsibility to preserve and respect golfs’ traditions and culture. He can do that by giving up his Pings.

4 thoughts on “Of Cheating, Loopholes, Fairness and Golf

  1. What a ridiculous rule. It begs to cause controversy. It’s like if baseball said, “Corked bats made before 1995 are legal” or other fill-in-the-blank super-bat.

    Rules govern equipment and exceptions are made for players, not equipment.

    Take Hockey. There are a variety of helmets, and going back to when the first helmet rule went in to effect, players were grandfathered in to allow players who were unaccustomed to wearing a helmet to continue to not wear a helmet.

    The PGA should have provided all current players a chance to declare their preference for the square wedge and grandfathered in those players. But the way it is currently written, my grandkids who will be born in 30 years could play their entire careers with these square wedges.

    What kind of rule is that?

  2. Law suits will make you agree to some crazy things. But in a pro sport, this sort of thing is beyond ridiculous. Which suggests that the sportsman golfer would act as if it wasn’t there, no?

  3. I officiate high school baseball and football. It never ceases to amaze me as to how far some coaches will go to push the limits and try to get around the rules just to get an edge.

  4. Pingback: Golf ethics | FinalPriceCars

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.