Unethical U.S. Presidential Candidacies: Is Trump’s the All-Time Worst?

There have been many unethical candidacies for U.S. President in American history, and some of them have been successful.

I am not referring to unethical candidates for the job, for there have been too many of them to count. An unethical candidacy occurs when a candidate’s purpose for seeking the job, method of doing so, and/or the effect on the nation of his or her campaign is especially reckless, harmful, or irresponsible. Perhaps the first unethical candidacy was that of Aaron Burr, who attempted to exploit a flaw in the election process to steal the presidency from his position as a vice-presidential candidate. Rutherford B. Hayes allowed himself to be put in office by an undemocratic back-room deal when his opponent, Samuel Tilden should have won both the popular and electoral vote.

Teddy Roosevelt’s decision to oppose his old friend, President Taft, in 1912, splitting his party, breaking his word (he had earlier refused to run for what was in essence a third term, agreeing it was best to hold to George Washington’s tradition), and all-but-insuring Woodrow Wilson a victory, was an exercise in ego and hubris. Eight years later, Sen. Warren G. Harding, who privately expressed doubts about his ability to fill the highest post in the land, may have allowed himself to be manipulated and used by corrupt political operatives for their own purposes. Franklin Roosevelt recklessly ran for his fourth term knowing that he was seriously and perhaps terminally ill, and didn’t take care to ensure that he had a competent Vice-President. (He, and the U.S., were lucky in that regard.)

Gov. George Wallace’s third party presidential run in 1968 was explicitly racist. The beneficiary of that candidacy, President Richard Nixon infamously pursued re-election with a new low of unethical and even illegal tactics against the Democrats. There have been others.

Donald Trump’s revolting candidacy, as yet unannounced, cannot fairly be called the most unethical presidential candidacy, but it is early yet. It may well prove to be one of the most harmful. As the United States faces some of the most difficult challenges in its history, Trump has chosen to use the nation’s process of deciding on its leader for his own ego gratification and self-promotion, without  preparation for the job, deference to fair campaign rhetoric, or acknowledgment of his own fatal flaws as a candidate. Exploiting his status as a media celebrity in a celebrity-besotted culture, as well as the news media’s lack of discipline or principle, he is opportunistically advancing his candidacy on the lack of credible GOP contenders, using tabloid headline tactics. He has embraced the birther’s conspiracy theory, and another that says that William Ayres, the former domestic terrorist, secretly authored Barack Obama’s autobiography. Ignoring the fact that the statements of high-profile presidential candidates have international consequences, his few policy positions have included reckless and irresponsible answers, as when he told ABCs George Stephanopoulis and CNN’s Candy Crowley that the United States should  “take the oil” of both Iraq and Libya, and lower oil prices by threatening OPEC.

Donald Trump is perfectly happy to make a mockery of the presidential nomination and election processes while distorting them too. If he manages to convince enough fools to vote for him, hell, sure…he’d have a blast running for President. If his run peters out, it’s still worth lots of publicity, and increases the value of the Trump “brand.” Even the most unethical of the previous candidacies were based on a sincere, if misguided belief that the country’s welfare would be served by it. Does Trump have that belief? I wonder.

No, his can’t be called the most unethical candidacy. But it is reckless, and it is intentionally appealing to the worst in 21st Century American character: fear, celebrity worship, ignorance, and materialism. Meanwhile, every second of attention his candidacy distracts from serious consideration of our nation’s leadership reduces the chances of the public doing its hardest and most important job carefully and competently.

9 thoughts on “Unethical U.S. Presidential Candidacies: Is Trump’s the All-Time Worst?

  1. I won’t be voting for Trump (and I agree that many of his statements are nuts) but you fail to give him credit for apparently saying what he believes without regard to the political consequences. Not too long ago you found this to be a great virtue in your post excoriating Michelle Bachmann for doing what most politicians do — refusing to answer politically inconvenient questions.

    • That might be so, but I’ll quote Yahtzee Croshaw, who once said a similar act of faint praise was like saying, “My horse sure is easier to feed now that it’s dead.”

    • I’ll give him credit for being candid, all right. Absolutely. Though in his case, I attribute that candor not to political courage, but 1) shamelessness and 2) lack of seriousness.

    • …you fail to give him credit for apparently saying what he believes without regard to the political consequences

      …like doing a 180 on gay rights and abortion? He’s pandering worse than Mitt Romney.

      • Frankly tgt, I haven’t been following Trump that closing because I agree with Jack that Trump lacks seriousness. If he has done the 180 you allege, I turn down my “faint praise” a notch or two. BTW, I assume his pivot was towards the social-issue-right?

      • Gay rights and abortion can’t be hurt by Trump. They can’t even be helped by the current president. Non-issues all around. Consider your vote on other subjects.

        • My God, let’s hope we never have to consider the specifics of Trump’s “policies” in a serious way! I’m satisfied to find him unqualified based on his generally dubious values, his shady business dealings, his sordid personal life, his appalling narcissism, and the fact that he has the mannerisms and demeanor of a thug.

  2. Trump is running a campaign in exactly the same manner as one produces a reality tv show. He knows the villain always gets the most attention, so speak loudly and crazily, fire up a particular fan base, and reap the benefits/profits. Donald Trump has no intention of being president; like any good businessman, he’s found a forum he can exploit for the purposes of increasing profits. Unfortunately, this one really fucks up our country.

  3. Pingback: Ethics Quote Of The Week: Me, On the Presidential Candidacy Of Donald Trump | Ethics Alarms

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.