Calvin College, Forfeiting Its Right To Exist

As further proof of evolution, the chimp is behaving exactly like his distant relatives, the adminsitrators of Calvin College

I don’t know what the exact point is that marks where a religious school’s departure from legitimate adherence to its core beliefs metastasizes into a nuisance to society and civilization by affirmatively encouraging life-crippling ignorance. I do know, however, that Michigan’s  Calvin College has passed that point.

Two religion professors at Calvin wrote scholarly papers suggesting that new discoveries in genetics and evolution raised questions about the literal reading of Genesis that could no longer be brushed aside. Neither professor questioned the existence of God or the role of their church, but they argued that the findings of rigorous, modern science may require a theological re-examination of literalist Biblical teachings. Readers of The Banner, the publication of the Christian Reformed Church in North America, promptly blew a Biblical gasket:

“To protect the church and college from false teachers and contrary orthodox beliefs it would be right to let these guys go,” said one commenter. “Clearly, professors who deny the scriptures as interpreted by our creeds and who have broken the promise they made when they signed the Form of Subscription should be fired,” said another. From yet another: “Why is it that so many Christians and academics in Christian colleges seem more concerned about keeping in step with what the world teaches than they are about what God’s Word teaches? Are we ashamed of God’s Word in the face of the beliefs of our worldly peers?”

Calvin investigated the two professors, and as a consequence one of them, John Schneider, resigned the tenured position he had held for 25 years, as part of a settlement with the college. The other religion professor, Daniel Harlow, is fighting efforts to remove him. The joint statement from Schneider and Calvin says that the parties mutually agreed that Schneider should leave Calvin because tensions caused by his scholarship were threatening to create “harm and distraction.” The school’s statement praised Schneider’s commitment to the college, but said that his “recent and proposed scholarly work addressing issues in genetic science and Christian theology, as they relate to human origin, have engendered legitimate concerns within the college community and its constituencies.”

What’s going on here? Galileo, essentially. A religious institution, rather than face the fact that the progress of human knowledge has rendered its literal reading of the Bible as not merely impossible, but ridiculous and dangerous, is  holding its breath until it turns blue, sticking its fingers in its ears and throwing a tantrum, with the two professors as the targets.  For a school to do this…an institution dedicated to advancing knowledge rather than suppressing it—is beyond defending.

Schneider was, in fact, trying to do Calvin a favor, by opening a dialogue that could lead the school out of the 16th century and rescue its students from a lifetime of confusion. The professor presented his recent  epiphany on evolution in a lecture at Baylor University and then published it in “Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith,” a journal of the American Scientific Affiliation, an organization of Christian scientists who seek to reconcile their research and their faiths. Schneider knew that Calvin requires that faculty members must affirm that “the Bible is the authoritative, Spirit-breathed Word of God, fully reliable,” and that “God, the almighty creator of a good world, is sovereign over all of creation, granting to human beings, made in his image, the responsibility of caring for this world.” But he is also a teacher, and a seeker of truth. Once scientific evidence dictated that the school’s denial of evolution rendered its orientation impossible, he was right to raise the issue and challenge dogma.

Schneider has said that the scientific developments that raised the greatest questions for him have come out of the recent breakthroughs in genetics, which he said strengthened the evidence for evolution and raised specific questions about the accuracy of Genesis. His most controversial views were his expressed doubts that there were only two original humans, Adam and Eve, a fable that DNA evidence conclusively disproves. This is the problem with denying evolution, for it is the foundation of other disciplines of science, including biology, genetics, geology, anthropology, biochemistry and even astronomy. Is it possible to understand the world adequately without accepting evolution as fact? No. Is it irresponsible for an institution of higher education to send graduates into the world who are incapable of that understanding?

Yes.

Calvin is preparing students for an existence that may see them writing dismaying letters like this one, from a perplexed mother to a child-raising website. Her neighbor had given her son a toy dinosaur, she said:

“I am a little shocked. She says she is a Christian, but the Bible doesn’t say anything about dinosaurs. Should I let him keep them, as long as he understands that dinosaurs aren’t real? Even the PBS shows that he watches talk about dinosaurs and evolution, and how the scientists found these “bones” but the Bible doesn’t say that God ever created them, and the earth is only 6,000 years old, not old enough to have “bones” that they say are MILLIONS of years old! I know that Satan tries to trick us in many ways, and this is one way that he tries to fool man into believing that there isn’t a God who created the universe. How can they be bones when they are made out of ROCKS? I told my son that dinosaurs are one of Satan’s many ways of tricking man, and he must talk to God before he plays with them. Am I handling this right? My first 3 were all girls, and I adopted boys, and lots of mothers tell me that boys are often attracted to these dinosaurs. So I don’t know what to do. Is this just harmless fantasy play for him, or should I be worried that he may go on to believe in things like evolution?

Schneider and Harlow courageously  gave Calvin a chance to work toward a time when no graduates leave the school thinking this way, and the school has chosen to persecute them as their reward. They also were trying to perform a service for all religion, for desperate fictions like the claim that Satan is planting dinosaur bones just makes all faiths seem archaic and idiotic.

In the 21st Century, a college that intentionally and stubbornly endorses ignorance and rejects science should not be regarded by any employer as a serious, respectable institution. A Calvin degree should dictate automatic rejection in the job market for any graduate, and the school, as quickly as possible, should be made to shut its doors, permanently, for the protection of the young minds it is determined to warp. It is a disgrace that this country’s grammar schools allow any one to reach adulthood and write a letter like the one above. For a college whose motto is “Minds in the making” to encourage it is intolerable.

10 thoughts on “Calvin College, Forfeiting Its Right To Exist

  1. Seems like Calvin has fallen from grace, even when given the opportunity to try to correlate scientific findings with Biblical history. As a Christian, I believe we are given intellect for a reason, that is, to use it, and to recognize the products of its application to the world around us. If indeed the Bible is the inspired word of God, as is true, then we must find ways in which to correlate what is written there with the products of scientific achievement, made through the God-given gifts of intellect which we are given by God. Seems like Calvin missed this point, which is a shame, since there are so many Christian scholars who are successfully engaged in the rapprochement between science and religion. So, agreed. However, does it mean you must castigate its graduates, all of them? Perhaps some sneaked through, and collected their B.S. or B.A. without truly believing the very things “required” of the Calvin College “pledge?” Perhaps, as economics majors, or French majors, it may not make a difference in their choice of employment. Followed to its conclusion, perhaps we should ask Harvard to close its doors, because its graduates are intolerant, and incapable of acceptance of others, when they vehemently disagree with others’ views. Should all Democrats be denied the vote because they would fail a test of knowledge of basic economics?

    • Tough one. There are people who went to school in a cardboard box who are smart too, but nobody gives them props for a degree. The best way to kill an unethical school is to make sure potential students know that the degree is worthless. And a degree with this attitude toward knowledge is worthless.

  2. I have some honest questions,not arguing,so don’t rip me apart please. Is Calvin College government subsidized? All universities in the US were Christian at one time as I understand it. If you teach or receive a degree from a Christian college then wouldn’t it be automatically understood what your beliefs are? No deception. The only other choices for Christians are secular colleges in which they are often treated with hostility. I admit I am unlearned in such things but I don’t see how whether I believe humankind began with 2 or 2 million makes any difference to my business degree. Perhaps rather than shutting Calvin down they could teach evolution as well as creation or drop science altogether.

    • 1. The issue isn’t whether the school is publicly funded or not. The issue is whether it is committing educational malpractice.
      2. It is. “Beliefs” for a school may not interfere with reality, or the quest to understand reality. If a college taught that the world was flat, that blacks were inferior and that 1+1+5, it would not be a college, but a fraud. Insisting that the earth is 6000 years old is no better.
      3. you can’t cure incompetence with disclosure: “We’re teaching ridiculous, ahistorical, nature and physics-defying nonsense!” Okay, fine! Really? No.
      4. It is a fallacy to pretend that you can be completely misinformed on something as important as how the universe works and still be educated. The process the school uses to get to its conclusion is antithetical to logic and analysis.

      A grad of this school is unemployable, or would have to prove that he or she cured the miseducation somehow. What kind of school is that?

      An inexcusably incompetent and reckless one.

    • Just a clarification: The science departments at Calvin have no trouble teaching evolution. The current controversy, at least at the school, has largely been about how to understand the theological implications of recent science. With some of the school’s constituents, it may be the case that there is suspicion of evolutionary science in general. But at least with most at the school itself, that’s not the issue at all.

  3. Jack,science is constantly changing. Nothing is really written in stone. .. Is the big bang theory still held with the same regard it once was? Didn’t Haeckel produce fraudulent drawings of human and animal embryos trying to prove common ancestry? Hasn’t there been other frauds perpetrated on the public? Doesn’t government money decide what scientists find at times? What I’m trying to say is science isn’t infallible and scientists aren’t beyond fudging or at least being sincerely wrong. You don’t believe creationism should be taught. That’s fine. But it seems to me that scientists are given god-like stature as if nothing they say should ever be held in question. That doesn’t seem to healthy to me either.

    • The big bang theory is still widely accepted as it is still predicted by the information we have. What may have occurred BEFORE the big bang isn’t well defined.

      Haeckel? He was shot down by the scientific community during his own time… just like science is supposed to work.

      Science and scientists do not claim that science and scientists are infallible. The whole point of the scientific method is to account for biases and beliefs that run contrary to reality. Scientists do not have god-like stature because (1) they support their statements with evidence, and (2) they do not threaten those that do not agree with them with eternal torment.

      • And if I may piggy-back—the point isn’t whether or not science is always right or ever conclusive, but that continuing inquiry is encouraged. Calvin, in contrast, wants the discussion ended circa. 1572. That’s not an institution of higher learning. That’s an institution of indoctrination.

Leave a reply to Jack Marshall Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.