There has been an epic thread, over a week long now, I think, on Ampersand’s blog about the Zimmerman trial. It has been very illuminating and valuable for me, because the vast majority of the discussion consists of articulate knee-jerk liberals desperately searching for some way to hold on to the myth that Trayvon Martin was the victim of racial profiling, and that George Zimmerman, a closet racist cold-blooded killer, got away with murder. It is fascinating, if depressing. So many seemingly smart people who just “know” that Zimmerman was really guilty, and that Martin was gunned down because he was wearing a hoodie and carrying Skittles.
One of the outnumbered rational commenters there, a chap calling himself Conrad, responded to a persistent Zimmerman-hater who kept saying that it was “50-50” who started the fatal fight, and that it should disturb anyone that there is, therefore, a 50-50 chance that Zimmerman got away with murder. Conrad pointed out that the evidence, in fact, strongly suggested that Zimmerman did not provoke the physical encounter, and, sure enough, none of the factual arguments to the contrary were deemed persuasive. I had intervened several times in the discussion (since it was launched in the blog post by Ampersand saying that my assertion that there were no legitimate grounds on which to challenge the jury’s verdict as anything but compelled by the evidence was biased), and this was the final straw.
I wrote, to Conrad:
“Fascinating, isn’t it? So many compassionate, fair, intelligent people tying their brains into knots because they have staked everything on a badly cast George Zimmerman being the epitome of a murderous, conservative, vigilante racist. Oops! He’s not white! Oops! His prom date was black! Oops! He voted for Obama! Oops! He never used a racial slur! Oops! He was jumped by the victim! Oops! He really was injured! Oops! The evidence and all the witnesses support his account! Never mind…you just KNOW he did it.
“This is the real lesson of this endless mess–how confirmation bias makes good people into bigots and persecutors.
“There is another piece of evidence: when police, while interrogating Zimmerman, told him that the entire altercation was caught on a security camera—a lie, to check his reaction–his instant response, according to witnesses, was “Thank God!” Clever guy, that George. Quick thinking!
“But this has never been about evidence. It was about making Obama’s base fear for their lives just in time for the 2012 elections, and increasing racial divisiveness for cynical political gain. At least I hope that was what it was about, because if there wasn’t some tangible reason for it, it is the stupidest self-inflicted wound on society that I can remember.”
I was shortly thereafter shocked to receive Ampersand’s stern reprimand for this comment.
“Jack, please reread the moderation goals for this blog. In particular, this bit: “Debates are conducted in a manner that shows respect even for folks we disagree with.” If you don’t find it possible to disagree with people while treating them with respect, then I’ll ask you to stop leaving comments here. Where would make me unhappy, so I hope it doesn’t come to that. –Amp”
He generously left my entire post up with a strike-through, making it unreadable as well as hanging a scarlet letter on the content. Nice. Apparently it was all too disrespectful. (In fact, I would judge many of the approved comments in the thread far more directly insulting to specific commenters than mine, which impugned the whole anti-Zimmerman chorus.)
Your Ethics Quiz as we head into the first August weekend:
Was it too disrespectful?
My answer, in no uncertain terms: absolutely not.
Indeed, the comment clearly evinced respect, if disappointment, for some of the disoriented souls, including Barry, a.k.a Ampersand, who have let their ideology lead them to doing tangible harm to the nation and spreading madness out of well-intentioned ideological fervor. Do I have any respect whatsoever for the position being pushed by Sharpton, Obama, MSNBC, the Congressional Black Caucus, and others? No, frankly, I don’t. I think it is unsustainable on the facts, and is playing into the hands of those who seek to divide the nation. I think that fact that George Zimmerman and his family have to fear for their lives because the tragic death of Trayvon Martin has been compared to the murders of Emmet Till and Medgar Evers is abhorrent, and I think allying oneself with such public deceivers is equally abhorrent.
I also think that if sane, reasonable people, like Barry, are ever going to be brought back from the brink, they need to be splashed with the icy water of reality, harsh as it is. Zimmerman is being presumed to be a racist because he’s not a dark Hispanic, and because the original, inaccurate, accounts of the shooting were seized upon by race-hustlers with such gusto….and they lack the integrity and courage to admit they were wrong. (Too “disrespectful”?) The presumption of the entire debate is that whites secretly, or not so secretly, feel that all blacks are potential criminals. I am personally offended by that presumption, and more than offended that the President of the United States tacitly validated that point of view. Offended, but not surprised.
As if I haven’t made it clear already, I believe the effort to make this incident into a racial cause celebre has been a terrible thing for the country, unless one thinks that the quality of perceived race relations declining 25%, according to polls, is a good thing—and yes, I believe there are political allies of the President and Democrats who do think it is a good thing. I do believe this is either Machiavellian or stupid, and I do believe that it will stand as one of the American Left’s darkest and most embarrassing moments.
That is, I believe, what my comment said, and if the tone of it was exasperated, that is an accurate expression of how I feel. As I told Barry in leaving his general excellent blog (which I have added to the Ethics Alarms links), apparently the truth hurts. That could be a motto, on both sides, for this whole, ugly fiasco.