CNN: “How Is The North Charleston Shooting Different From Ferguson?” KABOOM!

HeadExplode3

My answer:

“In North Charleston the officer executed a fleeing man, while in Ferguson an officer used appropriate force to defend himself, but CNN represented the story as an officer executing a fleeing man anyway.”

I literally just saw this minutes ago, so I can’t provide a link, and because smug, biased, despicable-beyond-words CNN morning anchor Carol Costello caused my head to explode with her commentary, the accuracy of my quotes may be a little off.

My brains hit the ceiling the second Costello said, “Unlike the shooting of Mike Brown by a Ferguson, Missouri police officer, the shooting of Walter Scott in North Charleston was captured on video. Witnesses in the Ferguson case disagreed about key facts in the shooting, and about whether Brown’s hands were up or not.”

Disgusting journalism, and close to pure evil. How long did Carol labor over that deceitful phrasing? Though Mike Brown’s shooting has been decisively shown by the credible eye-witness testimony and forensic evidence to have been consistent with the police officer’s account, and though the witnesses claiming that Brown was surrendering have been shown to be following the lead of CNN guest Dorian Johnson, who lied about what happened and set off the nationwide “Hands Up! Don’t Shoot!” protest theme, Costello and CNN are deliberately linked the two incidents, suggesting in tone and context that had there been a video, Darren Wilson might have been shown to be an executioner too.Oh, it’s clever: my accusation is plausibly deniable. ‘Why, the point of this comparison is to show how the response to the event was so much faster and more transparent in North Charleston!’  I don’t believe it. Saying that authorities have learned from Ferguson’s mistakes is one thing; comparing the two shootings and suggesting that they are (or may have been) the same but for the absence of a video in one continues to keep the “Hands Up!” lie alive. And I believe that is Costello’s intent.

Protesters in South Carolina are linking the two shootings, too.

The reason authorities have moved faster in South Carolina is that there isn’t a media-driven, counter-factual false narrative being built by activists, politicians and CNN that made rational investigation and analysis of what happened impossible with all the hysteria and lies flying around. If Ferguson and state authorities moved as quickly in the wake of Brown’s shooting as in the response to Scott’s death, Wilson would have been fired and indicted, and would have had to stand trial. Then he would have been acquitted (one hopes), and pundits could call that racism too. That is what CNN’s talking heads wanted, and apparently they still are wistful that they couldn’t make it happen.

CNN’s directly comparing the two shootings as if the differences are hard to discern is reckless, dishonest, unfair, irresponsible and incompetent, and continues to support the false Ferguson narrative  that the Justice Department report on Ferguson should have obliterated. One shooting was a murder, and the other wasn’t. Comparing the responses to the two shootings is a valid exercise, but CNN continues to hint that if only there had been a video, Mile Brown might get justice.

KABOOM.

7 thoughts on “CNN: “How Is The North Charleston Shooting Different From Ferguson?” KABOOM!

  1. Termination and prosecution of Wilson might have been better. As it stands, Wilson chose to quit to take the pressure off the department. He’s now unemployable.

    With a couple of wrongfull termination and prosecution lawsuits, he’d at least have something to live on.

  2. It would have been interesting if CNN had taken the tack: “hands up, don’t shoot” was a false narrative, but is now true in SC.

  3. I literally just saw this minutes ago, so I can’t provide a link, and because smug, biased, despicable-beyond-words CNN morning anchor Carol Costello caused my head to explode with her commentary, the accuracy of my quotes may be a little off.
    ******************
    Well, Jack, this might help:
    Monday or Tuesday morning (not sure, it’s been a busy week), the hateful and brain dead anchor was describing the religious make up of some other country and said, “40% Christian, 35% Muslim, 10% Jewish and 15% Roman Catholic.”
    They then went to commercial and when they returned she immediately corrected herself.

    So…you know, she either just reads from a teleprompter without thinking about what she is saying or she is so friggin’ stupid she doesn’t know that Catholics are Christians.
    This is an anchor on a nationwide network.

    • And let’s assume for a moment that some producer or writer gave her the story…there could have been a second person who does not know that Catholics are Christians.
      No wonder the rest of the world is laughing.
      Stupid is the new black.

    • I tend to be charitable about gaffes from people who spend so much time on the air, and sepaking for a living makes it a Golden Rule issue. Example: this week I used the word “wife” in part of a presentation where I always use “spouse.” A female lawyer in the class was offended that I “would assume that all lawyers are men” —hard to do, since about 33% were female—and complained to the law firm’s marketing chief, who wasn’t there, but wants an “investigation.” I received about a 95% excellent rating for the session, and I bet IO lose the client.

      No, I forgive the gaffe, like Obama’s “57 states” goof. I can’t forgive her being aqn unprofessional, hateful, biased hack.

    • I tend to be charitable about gaffes from people who spend so much time on the air, and sepaking for a living makes it a Golden Rule issue. Example: this week I used the word “wife” in part of a presentation where I always use “spouse.” A female lawyer in the class was offended that I “would assume that all lawyers are men” —hard to do, since about 33% were female—and complained to the law firm’s marketing chief, who wasn’t there, but wants an “investigation.” I received about a 95% excellent rating for the session, and I bet IO lose the client.

      No, I forgive the gaffe, like Obama’s “57 states” goof. I can’t forgive her being aqn unprofessional, hateful, biased hack.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.