Ethics Observations On The Astounding Yet Predictable Hypocrisy Of Connecticut Congresswoman Elizabeth Esty

The abuser and his enabler, who is also a devoted champion of protecting women in the workplace for male predators unless the particular predator is useful to her.

Rep. Elizabeth Esty (D-Conn) was quick to demand the Rep. John Conyers resign when the facts surfaced of his habitual sexual harassment of staff and other women. She backed the shaming and eviction of Minnesota Senator Al Franken, another Democrat, based on allegations of sexual misconduct. She has been a vocal  champion of the #MeToo movement on Capitol Hill.

But it has all been posturing, for Esty doesn’t embrace the actual principles of It’s Time or #MeToo. Like so many other employers, businesses and cultures, like NBC, CBS, Hollywood, the Weinstein Company, the Metropolitan Opera, the Trump White House, and, of course, the Catholic Church, Esty believes  that sexual harassment and sexual abuse are unacceptable and a reason to point fingers and level accusations when someone else does it, enables it or ignores it, but when the abusive employee is your own and is a “high performer,” as in “a star,” it’s different somehow.

When she learned that her own valuable Congressional aide, chief of staff Tony Baker, had engaged in harassment and abuse of Esty’s own female staff members, Esty moved to protect Baker rather than the women. He was not dismissed from his position until three full months after his wrongful and illegal conduct was known to her, continuing to work with the same women he had threatened.  Then she signed a non-disclosure agreement and paid him $5000, while also writing a glowing recommendation so he could be free to harass women someplace else. Baker got himself employed  by Sandy Hook Promise, a gun control group, which dismissed him after the full story of the reasons behind his leaving Esty’s staff came out last week.

“You better fucking reply to me or I will fucking kill you,” Baker had said  in a voice mail message to Estes aide Anna Kain. Kain was granted a restraining order against Baker after she signed a sworn affidavit that the Esty chief of staff punched and threatened to kill her. This and more was still not enough for Rep. Esty to see her way to firing him. Woke is apparently not the same as “awake.” Or sincere.

Now Democratic women in the Connecticut state legislature are demanding that the congresswoman resign. Esty refuses, saying in a recent statement,“For those who have asked, I want to be clear that I am not resigning, that I have important work to do in Congress, including building on the lessons of this horrible series of events.” Translation:I will be working to put in pl;ace measures to stop people like me from behaving as I did.”


Esty’s version of public damage control was almost as embarrassing as her handling of Baker’s conduct.  Esty really is going with the argument that she is especially well-positioned to advance the cause of preventing sexual abuse in the workplace by pushing for regulations needed by employers just as unethical and clueless as she is. Her new chief of staff promoted a note of support from a local Democrat, that said,  “Elizabeth has learned first hand the improvements needed to protect Congressional staff, and has fought and will continue to fight to implement those needed procedures and protections.” In her own letter to House Democratic , Esty said the misconduct by her former chief of staff should be a cautionary tale for Congress to tighten up the way it handles domestic violence and sexual harassment.

Wait, what? His conduct should be a cautionary tale for Congress? What part of “there’s a serial abuser running amuck on your staff, harming and threatening women, and he needs to be stopped immediately!” requires a cautionary tale? Then she told the Hartford Courant. “I was not the perpetrator of this.” “This” apparently means she did not herself harass her staff. If “this” means the cover-up, she damn well was the perpetrator. Finally, she argues, “I think there’s a whole record of what I’ve accomplished.”

In other words, “I deserve The King’s Pass.”

A few more observations:

  • This wasn’t a case of a key staff member being accused of past domestic abuse, as with Trump aide Rob Porter. This was a case of ongoing abuse of one staff member against other female members of the Congresswoman’s staff. There was immediate peril to Esty’s employees, and yet the Representative did nothing except, she says, tell her chief of staff that he should get counseling. She also, she says, “launched an internal review of management policy and practices and an investigation into what was going on in the office.”

Suuure: it took three months to find out that another aide had been punched by the creep.

  • It isn’t just the Trump White House that behaves like this, or Esty, or the Boston Archdiocese, or big law firms.  It is most organizations and the unethical people who run them, who with predictable and almost unwavering consistency will always try to ignore or minimize wrongdoing by a key employee when 1) being transparent about it will bring bad publicity and 2) when losing that employee is perceived to be sufficiently harmful to the organization, the harm that key employee has done, is doing or will do to others will be judged to be secondary.

In other words, the ends justify the means.

  • Esty’s conduct and statements show that all of her support for the anti-harassment movement was calculated grandstanding. She was willing to throw Democratic colleagues Conyers and Franken to the wolves for political expediency, but when her stated principles required swift and obvious action to protect women on her own staff, those principles evaporated.

She is a hypocrite and a liar, of course. She is also, I surmise, not an exception, but the rule.

7 thoughts on “Ethics Observations On The Astounding Yet Predictable Hypocrisy Of Connecticut Congresswoman Elizabeth Esty

  1. ”including building on the lessons of this horrible series of events.”

    Reminds me of what “Leap Of Faith” character Jonas Nightengale (Steve Martin) said (though FAR more eloquently) when his sordid past was divulged by Sheriff Will Braverman (Liam Neeson)

    ”I say to you, if you wanna give up the bottle, who you gonna talk to? -Someone who’s never touched a drop? – No!
    ”If you wanna give up womanizing, who you gonna talk to? – Some pale-skinned virgin priest? – No!
    ”If you wanna give up sin-and I believe everyone here tonight wants to give up sin-who can lead you? You need a real sinner, people. A sinner of such monumental proportions that all your sins couldn’t possibly equal the sins of this King of Sin!
    ”Because you know,if he can walk that righteous path, if he can go from grift to grace, from sin to sanctity, from lowliness to holiness, that you, with all your everyday sins, can rise up like an angel and ride that golden elevator
    to God’s own penthouse in the sky.”

    Or what’s know to those in the business as “weaving caca into cashmere.”

  2. I think what is appalling is the lack of self-awareness of people like Rep. Etsy. I think it might even be shamelessness. I find it crazy to think, that one can look into the mirror and claim to fight for women and have this occur under their watch. It’s like the female brothel owner claiming she is a beacon of female owned and run businesses. This reminds me the beginning of the movie “Serenity”, where the character of the menacing govt agent pays a visit to an engineer that messed up. He gives the engineer the opportunity to resign, due to his grave mistake. The engineer refuses, so the agent uses a paralysing agent on the guy. Holding up a sword, the govt agent tells him he will fall on it in a short while, when the paralysis wears off. He also tells him, that there is no shame in this, when a man that failed takes accountability and commits suicide. I don’t endorse such an outcome, but I think this scene is a very dramatized symbol of the importance of duty. Suicide being a stand in for resignation, and the paralysis as a saving face action, as in if you don’t go willingly, we’ll make you go.

  3. I think this is what’s meant by “virtue-signaling.” Not flaunting one’s virtues, but rather loudly proclaiming them to exist, where they just don’t.

    • They are all crooks, as my pappy says. Got avarice in their hearts, lies on their lips, and darkness in their souls.

      We have chased all but these away from politics.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.