Comment Of The Day #2 On “Evening Ethics Update, 11/7/2019: Dr. King Is Un-honored…” (Item #4)

Jutgory registered  the second Comment of the Day spawned by Kansas City returning one of its historic boulevards to its original name, less than a year after re-naming it for civil rights martyr, Martrin Luther King.  The first COTD on the topic is here.

Looking at the re-naming question from a totally different, and interesting angle, is JutGory’s Comment of The Day on #4, the Kansas City Street Name Battle, in the post, “Evening Ethics Update, 11/7/2019: Dr. King Is Un-honored, Virginian Republicans Are Non-Functional, Fox News Is Pro-Darkness, And Joy Behar Is Still An Idiot”…

I have thought quite a bit about the MLK issue and this post seems as good a reason as any to comment.

First off (a disclaimer): I am not a huge MLK fan. And, what I mean by that is that I find Malcolm X to be a much more compelling figure. It is not that one has to have a favorite civil rights leader. They can both be good, but MLK seems to be the civil rights leader that gained the White People Stamp of Approval. That’s really not MLK’s fault, but I prefer Malcolm X’s harsh realism to MLK’s lofty idealism.

Next, names are important. But re-naming something, as the case in KC, is often more important. My area is embroiled in such a naming controversy of late. For those not in the know, a lake in our area was recently re-named (sort of). The Lake had been named after the Secretary of War when local soldiers were surveying the area for settlement. The Secretary of War also served as a United States Senator, and rose to the level of Vice-President of the United States.

The problem is that he was an all around horrible individual, so horrible that even Andrew Jackson hated him. And, not only that, he both owned slaves and defended slavery. That, of course, was John Calhoun, the namesake for Lake Calhoun in Minneapolis.

Well, in the climate of “cancel culture,” that cannot stand. The City Council, in a virtue signaling “two-fer” and without much of any public input, decided to re-name the lake to “Bde Maka Ska” (your pronunciation may vary), its original name given to it by our Sioux Indian predecessors. Other parties quickly came in to assert their jurisdiction over the name of the lake. It was quickly changed back to Lake Calhoun. But, the chattering masses of the Facebook mob would have none of that; with the cat out of the bag, they are committed to Bde Maka Ska; Wikipedia also seems to have expurgated Lake Calhoun from its pages.

Don’t get me wrong: I am no fan of Calhoun. But, I am reluctant to commit the “genetic fallacy” that the origin of the name of the lake continues to have the meaning of the name as it was originally conceived. While named for John Calhoun, the name Calhoun now encompasses the area (Calhoun Square, Calhoun Drive, Calhoun Beach Club, etc). That was the name it held for close to 200 years. It was the name by which I knew it before I even knew who John Calhoun was.

(Lake Harriet is located right nearby and only today did I learn that it was named for the wife of Henry Leavenworth, who was stationed at Fort Snelling (another name) at the time. No one seems to care about Harriet Lovejoy.)

So, getting back to The Paseo in KC, it reminds me of the MLK Blvd. in St. Paul. There was a Chris Rock skit, I believe, that said you never wanted to find yourself on MLK Blvd. in the middle of the night. They are often located in bad parts of town. I don’t know if that is true of The Paseo, but it is definitely not true in the capital of The State Mondale Won. The MLK Blvd. in St. Paul passes right in front of the State Capital and the Supreme Court building. There is probably no more prestigious place to put it (though you still might not want to be caught there in the middle of the night).

What is my problem with that street being named after MLK? The name it replaced: it used to be called Constitution Avenue. Whatever the merits of MLK, Constitution Avenue is a far superior name for the street where the government is located.

Am I being unreasonable? Am I being racist? Are the reasons for my opposition to the names merely pretextual?

I don’t think so. There are two streets that branch off from MLK. One is John Ireland Blvd, named for an early bishop in St. Paul; that blvd. leads directly to the Cathedral of St. Paul a couple blocks away, so the name makes sense. The other is Cedar Street which, to the best of my knowledge, is named after no one. They could have easily changed that. Or, there is Plymouth Avenue in Minneapolis, but that is in a minority neighborhood; it is the stereotypical location for an MLK blvd.

But, re-naming is not easy. There are all kinds of names around the area, commemorating people none of us remember. Dale, Selby, Wabasha, Lyndale, Dowling, Lowry, Olson Memorial Highway (apparently named for a staunch communist), Snelling, Henneppin, Rice, Sibley, Robert, Washington, heck, we even have a Cesar Chavez Blvd.

I don’t know much about The Paseo. But, even trying to take a prominent name and changing can be complicated. I thought that they could change University Avenue to MLK. University Avenue crosses from one side of St. Paul to the other side of Minneapolis. Of course, it crosses right through the University of Minnesota. That would be a disruptive change. So, even when the streets are not named for someone, a change can be objectionable. It is a landmark by itself.

So, are the people in KC being racist? I don’t know. I doubt it (though some might be). It is not a simple proposition (or, at least, not as simple as it seems). There are any number of streets around here that could have been chosen to be named after MLK, and that probably would offend next to no one.

But, I do not like that Constitution Avenue was renamed for MLK (I write MLK because it is too long to write Rev Dr Martin Luther King Jr Boulevard–that’s another thing, Constitution Avenue is shorter).

I’m back for a few quick comments.

  • Andrew Jackson hated all kinds of people. You didn’t have to be horrible. It is true, however, that he harbored a special dislike for Calhoun, who looks like he could have been the model for the silly painting the maniac who haunted the house in the remake of “The Haunting,” Hugh Crain. Here’s the Senator…

And here’s Hugh…

  • Jut makes an interesting point: there are three reasons to rename a street, park or other landmark. The first is to remove the name of someone now considered unworthy. The second is to give a new honor to a personage deserving of an honor. The third is to do both simultaneously. The problem is that it almost always appears to be third, regardless of the intent.

4 thoughts on “Comment Of The Day #2 On “Evening Ethics Update, 11/7/2019: Dr. King Is Un-honored…” (Item #4)

  1. Thank you for the recognition, Jack.

    Though I have to say that this was one of those time where I enjoyed making the comment. it was one of those times when writing was fun. There was enough time; proper inspiration, and an opportunity to play with the material (Isn’t it great when that happens?); to wit:

    Me: “The problem is that [John Calhoun] was an all around horrible individual, so horrible that even Andrew Jackson hated him.”

    You: Andrew Jackson hated all kinds of people. You didn’t have to be horrible. It is true, however, that he harbored a special dislike for Calhoun.

    That was one of the most enjoyable sentences I have typed in a LONG time, for the very reason you suggest: when it comes to hatred, Andrew Jackson had a pretty low bar, perhaps the lowest of any President (or, at least the most notorious temperament). To suggest Calhoun was a close call in that regard was deliberately tongue in cheek.

    I am not sure if you got the joke; sometimes being smart enough to know better means you might miss the joke. I am sure those knowing less about Calhoun and Jackson could have missed it too. After all, I could be someone who figures that anyone on the 20 dollar bill, would be an exemplar of patience and restraint. But, no, I was just contrasting two awful people who hated each other, but who could each be honorable in their own ways.

    But, getting back one topic. Part of my enjoyment in writing the comment was writing about the Paseo without ever talking about it, but repeatedly digressing into other topics. I was mostly successful in that.

    The other item, which bears more reflection is that it appears that Constitution Avenue in St. Paul had been named Central Avenue until about 1987. So, the honor of Constitution is a relatively recent honor. Does that mean it is okay to change it at will? The experience with the Paseo suggests not; don’t mess with MLK. But, the Constitution? Whatever!

    While I still think that Constitution Avenue is a better name for THAT street, it does not have the history that some of the other streets I mentioned have.

    Does that matter?

    I am not sure.

    -Jut

    And, in fairness, Calhoun did not always have the crazy eyes: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FJohn_C._Calhoun&psig=AOvVaw2GLtwwLXO6XKvJYdJ3mpnR&ust=1573606598027000&source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CAIQjRxqFwoTCNCMs8S74-UCFQAAAAAdAAAAABAS

  2. Back about 15 years ago, the town renamed Airport Road (which was the main N/S drag after you got out of the center of town) to MLK Blvd, but had a note on the street signs that read ‘Historic Airport Road’, so they kept both names. Back then it was a somewhat controversial move (somewhat surprising for a town that rivals San Francisco in its left leaning tendencies).

    I just now learned that about 3 years ago the town decided to drop the ‘Historic Airport Road’ from the street signs. I am not sure if anyone noticed. You get used to things such as this.

    Interestingly, the town only renamed it down to the N/S dividing line — south of there it is still S. Columbia Drive. Hmmm, now that I’ve brought it up, do we think the city council will take note? Or does Columbia have some special meaning to the University crowd….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.