Morning Ethics Warm-Up, 2/13/2020: I’m So Sorry I Missed Your Birthday, Mr. Lincoln.

I am awash with shame.

Yesterday was Abe Lincoln’s birthday, and I didn’t remember until late last night. This is the inevitable result of Presidents Day, the lazy combination of Lincoln and Washington’s birthdays into one floating holiday that lumps all our Presidents together as if they were equally laudable. (They are all laudable, but not equally.) Thus Franklin Pierce gets as much love from our calendar as Abe and George, which is ridiculous. ( President Pierce’s birthday I remember, because it’s the same date as my wedding anniversary, November 23.) In the old days before the blight of Presidents Day, school children would spend both February 12 and 22  learning about and doing projects related Lincoln or Washington. Without either of these great leaders, we probably don’t have a nation today, or if we do, it would be a vastly diminished one. Our first and Sixteenth Presidents tower over the rest in leadership ability, vision, and impact on our history and culture. Both deserve their own holiday, because every American should take at least a day out of every year to remember these two icons and honor their essential contributions, at great sacrifice, to the existence of the United States of America as well as the welfare of all of its citizens, past, present and future.

Today, most Americans couldn’t describe what Lincoln said at Gettysburg, and that’s not a recent phenomenon. In the classic movie “Ruggles of Red Gap,” a barroom full of Americans in a Western frontier town are unable to recall Lincoln’s message, but the very British butler, recently immigrated, can. Charles Laughton, who played the butler, continued to deliver Lincoln’s masterpiece throughout his career after that scene became the highlight of the movie. You can watch it here—I’d embed it, but there is no YouTube version.

1. Self promotion dept. I’ll be participating in a live podcast later today, discussing the ethical implications of nepotism. Details to come.

2. Still more developments in the Houston Astros cheating scandal. Earlier this morning I watched a live press conference from the Astros Spring Training camp about the sign stealing scheme. From a public relations standpoint, the spectacle made the Astros problems worse.

Stars  Alex Bregman and Jose Altuve spoke for a grand total of 90 seconds, sounding for all the world  like American prisoners of war in North Korea. Owner Jim Crane did most of the talking, which was unfortunate for the Astros and baseball. He  took no responsibility at all for what went on in 2017, though he was at the top of the organization chart: this is called the “Ken Lay excuse.” Worse, Crane repeatedly refused to acknowledge that using a secret camera to relay to the Astros dugout the opposing catchers’ signs telling pitchers what to throw, which were then relayed to  Astros batters by players banging on trash cans, constituted cheating. All Crane would say was “We broke the rules. We can argue about what you want to call it.”

Worse still, Crane said that it was impossible to say whether the team’s full year of sign stealing, including the playoffs and the World Series (which the Astros won), gave his team a competitive advantage. “Maybe it did, maybe it didn’t” he said. “Our opinion is this didn’t impact the game. We had a good team. We won the World Series and we’ll leave it at that.”

In later interviews with the players after the press conference, it sounded like everyone had been prepped to keep saying “2017” over and over, because there are lingering suspicions that the Astros scam extended into 2018 and 2019. As commentator Matt Vasgersian mused afterward on the MLB cable channel, if the Astros had won a championship cheating all the way through 2017 and hadn’t been caught, why would they suddenly stop the next season?

3. (Formerly a second #2—sorry) Unethical, and an idiot too! Daniel Sprague was at The Stage Bar on Broadway wearing a red baseball cap that said “Make 50 Great Again.”  “At one point,” Sprague told reporters, “A female came up from behind me, spun me around, and punched me in the face and then grabbed my hat off my head…yelling, ‘How dare you!'” His face was cut, presumably because the woman was wearing a ring.

Oopsie! Wrong cap! Sorry, didn’t notice the words! Sprague has filed a complaint, and a search is underway for the woman.

These are the bad guys, as I have noted before, and they make up a significant portion of one party’s base.  And they don’t even know they are bad guys.

4. (Formerly #3)More baseball cap ethics, believe it or not: The ethics password is  competence. Baseball’s San Diego Padres pulled its new commemorative baseball cap from the web and grovelled an apology after complaints that a mash-up of two team logos looked like a swastika.

OK, it’s an unbelievably ugly design, but you have to be obsessed with Nazis to see a swastika in that logo without prompting. (I saw what I was supposed to see, the SD logo and the bat-swinging padre.) Of course, once people started complaining on social media, the team had no choice but to pull it.

I wonder…would  the woman  have punched Dan Sprague in the face if he had been wearing that cap?

5. (Formerly #4) Now back to Abe and more groveling .. Yesterday the Chicago Transit Twitter feed  retweeted a jovial message from a  passenger who posted photos of an actor portraying Abraham Lincoln at one of their stations and wrote

“Unquantifiable benefits of #publictransport — meeting #AbrahamLincoln last night on the @cta red line.”

“In honor of Black History Month, Abraham Lincoln was seen making a guest appearance on the CTA,” the Transit authority added. But some African Americans on social media expressed outrage that a white man—Abraham Lincoln—would be used to honor Black History Month. They really did.

In another example of organization administrators admitting wrongdoing where there was none in order to avoid controversy, Transit officials pulled the tweet, groveling, “Apologies, unfortunately our last retweet went in a direction that was not at all intended. Nonetheless, we WILL continue to honor the African Americans who have played a large role in CTA history.”

I would have preferred: “To those who complained about our tweet connecting President Lincoln and Black History Month: Grow up, and read a history book.”

6. (Formerly #4) Breed discrimination at the Westminster Dog Show. Golden retrievers are one of the top three most popular dog breeds  in the US, and have been for a long time. Yet the breed has never won Westminster’s Best in Show prize since they first were included in 1927. So this week, when Daniel, a 5-year-old golden from Ligonier, Pa., won the sporting group, the first time since 2006 that a golden had  advanced to the final round, his fans were thrilled.  The whole crowd at Madison Square Garden seemed to be rooting for Daniel to make Westminster history. As the judge was reviewing the final seven dogs, a chant of “Daniel! Daniel!” could be heard by TV audiences. And the winner was—a black Standard Poodle named Siba.

Now the hashtag #DanielWasRobbed is trending on social media, and there are some legitimate questions. Why have Poodles  won Westminster 10 times, and  Standard Poodles like Siba won five times, while no Labrador retriever, Golden retriever, or Jack Russell Terrier have won Best in Show ever? (Actually, there’s a good reason why Jack Russells have never won—they aren’t allowed in the show.)


32 thoughts on “Morning Ethics Warm-Up, 2/13/2020: I’m So Sorry I Missed Your Birthday, Mr. Lincoln.

    • Completely subjective and impossible to justify. It’s like picking best fruit out of a group of the top apple, orange, banana, plum, watermellon, pear and kumquat. Hmmm…is this a better pear than that is an orange?

    • It also seems wildly arbitrary, relying as it does on a single person’s interpretation of a written standard that is usually quite imprecise and laden with inexact definitions. With definitions like “chest at least as wide as a man’s closed hand”, it’s a stretch to call them “standards”. The entire concept of developing a “spec sheet” for living creatures is somewhat ridiculous on its face, isn’t it?

      I think dog-show judges are generally more interested in rewarding breeders of the more labor-intensive dogs breeds than the relatively easy-to-care-for “regular dogs”. It may be largely subconscious, but when they judge a poodle that has been meticulously groomed to within an inch of its life against a bulldog that only needs to be hosed down once a month, I think they’re awarding extra points for difficulty to the fussy breeds.

      • Perhaps we should just judge based on DNA samples obtained from all entrants. How are we to establish ‘pure’ examples of a breed without objective proof?

        “Sorry, your poodle’s great grandmother apparently had a dachshund in the woodshed. Disqualified.”

        • It is sort of amusing that we now do have the technology to fully sequence the genomes of each breed. Imagine how much more efficient it would be – just submit a cheek swab from your dog, and a computer will pick the winner based on how many “correct” nucleotides are in the DNA. No more travel, running around in show rings, or expensive grooming procedures! This could revolutionize this vaguely creepy, strange hobby, and allow even weirder people, such as basement-dwelling shut-ins, to participate in it! Sort of the animal-breeding equivalent of the old Star Trek episode, “A Taste Of Armageddon”.

    • Standard poodles can be great dogs, Paulie.

      By the way, not knowing anything about naming registered AKC dogs at the time, I registered our then little kids’ great, great Airedale “Pokey,” as in “The Pokey Little Puppy,” of course, which they’d read, “Dawson’s (my son’s name not the sire’s name) Biff Pocaroba.” She only lasted five years due largely to having contracted a near fatal case of Parvo as a half grown puppy. Great dog. She considered herself hid and invisible when just her head and shoulders were stuck beneath the bed.

      • As a dyed-in-the-fur Dog Person, I’ll concede that, OB.

        The world would be better served were I to reel in my canine bias, but since we got our 1st dog a half a century ago as we speak (a Yeller pup named Samantha), it’s been nothing but Labs in the Schlecht household.

        When I met the gal next door (through the backyard, actually) in 1996, I was prescient enough to realize she walked on the ground I was destined to worship; as luck would have it, she had a Golden Girl (Hannah) that adopted me.

        After that sweet girl shuffled off this mortal coil 17 years ago last month, 2 1/2 years later it made sense to go with what worked.

        And our dear, departed Hurley knocked it out of the park.

      • I do and probably most others here do as well but the fact that a woman punches a man for being perceived as a Trump supporter proves that some people believe that the evil doers are Trump supporters thus warranting a punching. I can tell you that some members of Congress probably cannot tell you to whom you were referring to as the bad guys.

  1. 2. In Virginia, since the blow drew blood, the offender could be charged with a Class 3 felony–malicious wounding, punishable by up to 20 years.

  2. #3: A thoughtful, moderate, and easy to read essay from a possibly recovering democrat:
    View at

    An excerpt: “I started to question everything. How many stories had I been sold that weren’t true? What if my perception of the other side is wrong? How is it possible that half of the country is really overtly racist? Is it possible that Trump Derangement Syndrome is a real thing, and had I been suffering from it for the past three years?
    And the biggest question of all was this: Did I hate Trump so much that I wanted to see my country fail just to spite him and everyone who voted for him?

    • I responded to her, naturally I don’t expect a response because she’s been inundated.

      Does she ever wonder how we got here? Does she ever wonder if the fact that a sitting president calling an entire half of the electorate “bitter clingers” or referring to an entire half of the electorate as “being on the wrong side of history” (which, frankly, means “hey, we kind of need you all to just die off please”) may have convinced that half of the electorate that the sitting president and his supporters actually considered them to be enemies?

      No president in history (before Obama) every discussed the broader American populace with that kind of divisive language.

      Then the following candidate referring to the same half of the electorate as deplorable racists, xenophobes, sexists, etc etc.


      It’s no surprise that half of the electorate began adjusting their behavior knowing that the Democrats treated them like they were enemies.

      And here we sit…with Left wingers crying about divisiveness and hoping we can have a bipartisan group hug to resolve these issues.

      Frankly I don’t care until the Left comes to terms with the glaring hatred that it began *ON IT’S OWN* since about the latter half of the younger Bush’s presidency. This was a unilateral development only recently reciprocated by the Right. I expect reconciliation to begin with the Left…until then, like I said, I don’t care about these sudden discoveries by the Left of “woe is us! woe be upon us! Look at the vitriol on both sides!!!”

    • This lady would find solace over at The New Neo where Neo tells of her “awakening” in her “A Mind is a Terrible Thing to Change” series (in the “categories” column on the right).

      This whole experience reminds me of how Rush challenges detractors to listen to his show, all of it, for a couple of days and see if they still dislike him. Most of the people, over the years, who have hated Rush will admit they have never listened, and would not listen to that “crap”. They base their opinion on what they are told, not on their own experience.

      I return you now to your regular programming….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.