Researchers Claim That Supporting Free Speech Is A Marker Of Intelligence. Whatever That Means.

I bet a really smart person wrote this. Maybe Chris Cuomo!

A group of studies reported today supposedly demonstrate that  support free speech is strongly  correlated with intelligence and “cognitive ability.”


  • If true, there sure are a lot of unintelligent people taking control of society and the culture right now.
  • The study’s definition of intelligence is based on IQ scores, which are blunt measures of intelligence at best. Since it is well-known that the inventor of IQ scores violently objected to the  test being used to measure above average intelligence when the device was designed to measure sub-normal cognitive ability, the fair definition of what the IQ test measures is that it measures what the IQ  test measures. I spend much of every day reading allegedly brilliant people’s astounding opinions and  analysis on every topic imaginable.  They may have high IQ’s, but their reasoning is derailed by ideology, ego, bias and rationalizations. One of the many revelations I have come to accept over the years is that intelligence is an unfathomably complex concept, and I understand it less today than I thought I did  when I was 18.
  • Worse than the dubious non-definition of “cognitive ability” is the vagueness of “free speech.” Is someone  supportive of “free speech” when they support the  punishment for someone daring to utter an opinion that doesn’t conform to mob cant as shunning, firing, and perpetual hostility? What about those cognitively gifted individuals who have decided that “hate speech,” as they define it, of course, isn’t covered by the freedom of speech? The smart people who run the Washington Post decided to doxx a woman who wore a politically incorrect Halloween costume at a private party two years ago . They claim that  “democracy dies in darkness,” which is lip service to free speech. Do we judge them on their stated beliefs , or their actions? How does the study  categorize those intelligent people who want to make it as difficult as possible for those they disagree with to have their opinions read and heard, by persuading social media to ban or block them, for example? How many people, because they are so darn smart, use lawyerly distinctions to justify non-government censorship as not offensive to “free speech” as defined in the Constitution?
  • At least the researchers have the integrity to state their bias up front: “We expected that people with higher cognitive abilities would be more inclined to embrace the open exchange of ideas, wherein viewpoints can be scrutinized and challenged in order to foster informed decision making and knowledge.” This is confirmation bias, and the foe of any reliable research. What a surprise: they expected their research to find that intelligence correlated with belief in “free speech,” and it did!
  • Rather than demonstrating that those with higher cognitive skills support free speech, I’d argue that the study is a wonderful example of why people with higher cognitive skills have a healthy distrust of allegedly objective scientific studies, even though such people are commonly called “anti-intellectual” and “deniers” by the smart people, a surprising number of whom, despite believing in “free speech,” still advocate denying such skeptics the opportunity to state their objections in various forms.
  • Ann Althouse’s son, who blogs now and then, wrote about this study, and one of the commenters responded,

I recently saw Angela Davis give a talk at a nearby university. During the q and a portion, someone asked her what she thought of “cancel culture.” I think a lot of people in the audience would presume that she supported it, but she said no, and went on to stand up for free speech instead.

Angela Davis is a Communist, which immediately calls her reasoning ability into question, and was complicit in the murders of four innocent people, which she will still rationalize to this day. The fact that she was willing to “stand up” for whatever in her dark and poisoned mind constitutes “free speech” does not raise my opinion of her intellect one bit.

Conclusion: These studies, which have been enthusiastically hyped on conservative websites all day, are worthless.

2 thoughts on “Researchers Claim That Supporting Free Speech Is A Marker Of Intelligence. Whatever That Means.

  1. Angela Davis also literally delivered propaganda speeches and general encouragement to the Jonestown community, which was also backed by Willie Brown, Harvey Milk, Jerry Brown, Huey Newton, Dianne Feinstein and Jimmy Carter. Without the entire Bay Area leftist establishment behind him, Jim Jones probably would never have been able to murder 900 people. The illegalities and abuses of power going on in his atheist commune were well known even before he moved the group to Guyana. But he was so good at using his followers to get Democrats elected that most of them looked the other way.

    She has the blood of a lot more than four people on her hands. Here is the speech she delivered to Jonestown:

    “I know you are in a very difficult situation right now and there is a conspiracy, a very profound conspiracy designed to destroy the contributions which you have made to our struggle. And this is why I must tell you that we feel we are under attack as well. When you are attacked, it is because of your progressive stand, and we feel that it is directly an attack against us as well. Therefore, more of us need to know that we will be carrying on this idea, then we will do everything in our power to ensure your safety and your ability to keep on struggling.”

  2. I’m waiting for “researchers” to claim that an absence of “hate” is a marker of intelligence. Re-cycling a comment I made once (where and when, I shall not disclose), in criticizing a nonsensical bumper sticker that had become popular, which said, “Hate is not a family value,” I said, ” A family must hate something, else its love has no value. “

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.