It Wasn’t Censorship That Caused The Principal To Take Down The Student’s Transgender Essay…

teaching-writing

Courthouse News Service reports that a March 2 opinion by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia has ruled that the Anderson Mill Elementary School in Spartanburg County, South Carolina and its principal had not exceeded their authority to regulate school-sponsored student speech when they refused to distribute a student essay on a controversial topic.

At issue was an essay authored by a 10-year-old girl on the topic of transgender individuals. Thework was originally included in an essay collection placed in the student’s classroom and distributed to parents. The school principal ordered the essay to be removed, telling the girl’s mother that it was age-inappropriate and would upset some parents. The mother filed a lawsuit on behalf of herself and her daughter for a claimed violation of the First Amendment, naming the principal, the school and the school district as defendants.

The law is pretty clear on this point, and I suspect that this was a pro-trans rights grandstanding and virtue-signaling exercise by someone who has time on their hands and money to burn, and who found a lawyer wanting to make noise about alleged anti-transgender discrimination…which this incident was not.

I regard such lawsuits as unethical abuses of process.

The appeals court said the principal had qualified immunity from the suit, citing the 1988 U.S. Supreme Court decision Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier. That ruling found no constitutional violation when a school district had refused to publish articles about divorce and teenage pregnancy in the school newspaper. “This case falls neatly within the Hazelwood framework,” Judge Stephanie Thacker wrote. Moreover, the judge wrote, the school district was also protected since the principal had not violated the child’s First Amendment rights. The girl’s mother’s suit had argued that the principal’s decision constituted impermissible viewpoint discrimination, presumably because she was told that he was concerned about the reaction of other parents. Although other circuits are split on the question of whether restrictions on school-sponsored student speech must be viewpoint neutral under Hazelwood, Thacker wrote, “We need not pick a side in this debate today,” for the principal’s decision was viewpoint neutral on its face. No essay taking the opposite view of the 10-year old had been included among the distributed essays. He had acted to reject the topic, not the opinion.

Here is the essay:

“I don’t know if you know this but peoples view on tran’s genders is an issue. People think that men should not drees like a women, and saying mean things. They think that they are choosing the wrong thing in life. In the world people can choose who they want to be not being told that their diction is wrong. I hope people understand that people can hurt themselves from others hurting their feelings. People need to think before they speak because one word can hurt someone’s feelings. We need to fix this because this is getting out of hand!”

I know the student is only in the 5th grade, but the principal (and the girl’s teacher) would have been justified in pulling the essay based on kindness. I count at least eight spelling, punctuation and grammar errors. I know public school instruction as gone to Hell since my elementary school days, but students should still not be praised for essays that demonstrate no particular skill in any aspect of writing. That essay roils with evidence of classroom indoctrination and lax standards.

9 thoughts on “It Wasn’t Censorship That Caused The Principal To Take Down The Student’s Transgender Essay…

  1. Guidelines for topics should really be given for students that young. When my brother was in 7th grade, he was given an assignment to do an essay about a famous or historical person. A list was provided of acceptable persons. The only celebrities were Walt Disney and Bill Cosby.

    It was the ’80s, after all.

    But even when I was in college, in speech class, one professor, in assigning us to come up with a pursuasive topic, made a special request, “Please, please do not choose abortion. We’re all getting along so well…”

  2. I think this would have gone quite differently in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. I’m not sure what language the Court who have used but the mother and her daughter would have won the lawsuit. Probably the school district would have had to pay a hefty fine and the principal would have been found to have violated the girl’s First Amendment rights.

  3. I need more info.

    If every student did an essay to be included, they should not exclude any. This is not a situation where editorial decisions are stated or implied.

    I do, however, agree that a topic list would have been prudent. Absent a list, anything is fair game. Anything. If you invite a child to talk about what concerns them, be ready for anything.

    This made me smile:

    “The school principal ordered the essay to be removed, telling the girl’s mother that it was age-inappropriate and would upset some parents.” What age do the parents have to be before they will stop being upset?

    Finally, I have to disagree that it would have been kinder not to distribute such a poorly written essay. One only becomes a good writer by being a bad writer.

    -Jut

    • 1. Do teachers get better when they are shown to be incompetent? I’ve seen no evidence of that.
      2. The issue isn’t whether it was a wise decision to pull the essay. It’s whether it was an unconstitutional one. It wasn’t.

      • Not sure what the first question relates to (bad writers?). But, yes, I think I agree with you (and/or the Fourth Circuit) on the lawsuit. But, the Principal may be right on the Constitution and still be flat out wrong about whether to pull the essay. I expect you would agree on that point.

        -Jut

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.