Once Again The Courts Step In To Prevent Woke Discrimination

believe all survivors

Say what you will about the Trump Education Department, the fact that it reversed the anti-due process bullying of the Obama administration, which threatened colleges and universities that did not use a presumption of guilt to investigate accusations of campus sexual harassment and assault, was laudable and ethical. Now the Biden administration is in the process of reversing the reversal, as it once again embraces a “believe all women” context for such cases. (Well, “believe all women” except in cases where the Governor of New York and the president of the United States aren’t involved—but that’s another story.)

Fortunately, we have the courts, which are being kept especially busy as the progressives in power try to run roughshod over that damnably inconvenient Constitution thingy. This month the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the disingenuous argument by the University of Minnesota that they weren’t stacking the deck against accused male football players due to their gender, but rather tilting the process toward their accusers because the school was biased against all students accused of sexual misconduct. Riiiight, the Court concluded:

The district court concluded that a university’s bias in favor of the victims of sexual assault does not establish a reasonable inference of bias against male students, citing Doe v. University of St. Thomas, 240 F. Supp. 3d 984, 991 (D. Minn. 2017). While the circumstances here also give rise to a plausible inference of bias in favor of sexual assault victims rather than against males, “[s]ex discrimination need not be the only plausible explanation or even the most plausible explanation for a Title IX claim to proceed.” Schwake, 967 F.3d at 948; see Columbia Univ., 831 F.3d at 57. Thus, we reverse the district court’s dismissal of the Does’ Title IX discrimination claims.

Last week the Tenth Circuit came to the same conclusion, ruling that bias against accused students can also constitute bias against a particular gender, particularly since the vast majority of those accused of sexual misconduct on campuses are male. Chief Judge Timothy M. Tymkovich wrote in the court’s opinion,

“While a one-sided investigation, standing alone, might only raise a reasonable inference of anti-complainant bias where there is a one-sided investigation plus some evidence that sex may have played a role in a school’s disciplinary decision, it should be up to a jury to determine whether the school’s bias was based on a protected trait.”

This has been a long time coming. The Obama “Dear Colleague” letter, a power-abusing “Nice little school you have there…be a shame if anything were to happen to it!” extortion missive that fed nicely into the already left-biased proclivities of most institutions of higher education, and encouraged school administrators to wreck the lives of many male students. This was a measure pandering to the large feminist Democratic base, which made its desires known by recasting its accusers of sexual misconduct into “survivors,” which instantly transforms unproven allegations into “truth.” The clever and unconstitutional rationalization was that Title IX ought to be used to force colleges to lean toward punishing the accused, lest a “hostile environment” and “rape culture” be allowed to victimize women. Most of the services and support offered to campus accusers of sexual assault—you know, “survivors”—are provided by campus women’s centers, making the claim that the bias against the accused is gender neutral hard to accept without smirking.

In this Year of The Great Stupid, when the Wonderfully Woke argue that it is just and right to presume police racism without evidence and that the remedy for systemic anti-black racism is systemic anti-white racism, the concept that fairness to female college students requires bias against male college students follows the script. Fortunately, the courts are not woke, but rather waking up.

___________________________

Pointer: Advice Goddess Blog

4 thoughts on “Once Again The Courts Step In To Prevent Woke Discrimination

  1. “Fortunately, the courts are not woke, but rather waking up.”

    For the moment, anyway. You mark my words, as soon as he is able, Biden is going to start stacking the courts his way. You already know the arguments here, you heard them all during the Kavanaugh hearings – some huge percentage of sexual abuse survivors are telling the truth, so automatically presume all are, it doesn’t matter how much time has passed, it doesn’t matter what the surrounding circumstances of the accusation surfacing are, it doesn’t matter what the circumstances of the act are, and it doesn’t matter if there is any actual evidence. The accused isn’t allowed to defend himself, because then he is assaulting this person all over again. It’s never been about justice, it’s about destroying whoever the woke set their sights on. Between that, white supremacy, and a few other accusations, they’ve got a pretty powerful arsenal, at least as long as ordinary people give it power.

      • Actually he is able now, with the new rules, although there are few slots open. What happens next year is anybody’s guess, either party only needs to pick up one seat to take the chamber outright. That said, unless he gets his act together and starts to deliver, the odds get much better that it will swing red and not blue, crippling him for the rest of this term.

  2. I guess that “aren’t” is not what you wanted to write in the sentence,

    Well, “believe all women” except in cases where the Governor of New York and the president of the United States aren’t involved—but that’s another story.

Leave a Reply to Zanshin Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.