Saturday Morning Ethics Warm-Up, 2/18/23: Palin, Pete, “Eco-grief,” Progressive Gun Law Schizophrenia And A Critic-Attacking Choreographer Update

It’s been a while between warm-ups, I know. They are a necessary feature to cover the myriad ethics issues that arise daily, even though even with them the task is impossible. Unfortunately, the format also requires almost twice as much time as a normal, single issue post, and the warm-ups usually prompt fewer comments and clicks, I’m not sure why. Fortunately, I don’t write Ethics Alarms for clicks. But it’s been chaotic around here lately, and I haven’t had many uninterrupted hours to prepare on of these multi-matter posts. This certainly isn’t one. Well, let’s just see what happens…

1. Of all people….Sarah Palin has advised Ron DeSantis to “stay Governor.” “DeSantis doesn’t need to [run],” Palin said in an interview with Newsmax. “I envision him as our president someday but not right now. He should stay governor for a bit longer,” she added. “He’s young, you know. He has decades ahead of him where he can be our president.” Someone needs to explain to Sarah the principle of ethics estoppel. Palin abandoned the job the citizens of Alaska elected her to do based in the belief that she would fulfill her commitment to do it, resigning as governor in 2009 after just three years on the job. If there is one person in the U.S. who has no standing to advise anyone to “stay governor,” it’s her.

Palin was horrible and unethically mistreated by the news media when she ran for VP with John McCain. Savaging her was part of the MSM’s push to elect Barack Obama; meanwhile, it ignored the obvious deficits of Obama’s running mate, a guy named Joe Biden. I defended Palin then, ethically so, but virtually everything she has said or done since has almost—almost-–made me regret it.

2. Oh for heaven’s sake….The Department of the Interior’s U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is offering “eco-grief” training to employees who are anxious and depressed about the impending planetary doom from climate change, among other things. The training is supposed to define their eco-grief and allow employees an opportunity to “examine their emotions” while giving them “and “tools to cope.” The HBO series “Big Little Lies” had an episode where second-grader had a crippling panic attack while her teacher was explaining that global warming was going to end life on Earth if we didn’t act quickly. But then she was six. Any U.S. government employee who suffers from “eco-grief” is too juvenile, emotionally stunted and unstable to be a public employee. The remedy for “eco-grief” is to grow the hell up.

An employee of Fish and Wildlife said, “The FWS is in absolute crisis when it comes to funding and staffing. Most refuges I know have lost 50 to 60% of their staff over the last 12 years. And yet consider how much time, money, energy and staff time is being spent on spreading the woke message. Would the FWS support its employees having a booth and being dressed in uniform and while on the clock supporting a pro-life festival?”

3. Advocating tougher gun laws and simultaneously promoting lenient law enforcement? Do we really have to explain to progressives what’s the logical inconsistency in that? Apparently! The Detroit Free Press reported that Anthony McRae — the man police indicated was responsible for slaying three innocent students and then killing himself — was arrested in 2019 on a gun-related charge in Lansing, Michigan. He wouldn’t have been allowed to acquire a gun under existing Michigan law, but the Ingham County District Attorney’s Office under progressive Democrat Carol Siemon, allowed McRae plead guilty to a misdemeanor. McRae would have been barred from legally purchasing, owning, or possessing a firearm if he had have been convicted of the original concealed weapons charge, but the misdemeanor conviction allowed him to be able to purchase a gun once he successfully completed his terms of probation.

If I were a dedicated conspiracy theorist, I might conclude that Democrats want to have as many mass shootings as possible so they can finally ban guns, because obviously the laws “don’t work.”

4. Wouldn’t you think, after one disaster and botched crisis after another on his watch, DOT Secretary Pete Buttigieg would be making a special effort to be effective and competent? If you did, you would be wrong. After the disastrous train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio, now causing residents symptom of chemical poisoning, this diversity appointment (Pete is gay, and has no other evident qualification for leadership in any setting) brushed off concerns and criticism by telling Yahoo Finance, “There’s clearly more that needs to be done, because while this horrible situation has gotten a particularly high amount of attention, there are roughly 1,000 cases a year of a train derailment.” Oh! Then it’s business as usual and no reason to be all upset, then! Buttigieg also resorted to the “needs to be done” dodge. By whom, Pete? You’re the one in charge. No no no, Pete says, tweeting, “Glad to see newfound bipartisan agreement here. We could start by discussing immediate steps Congress could take to address rail safety & reduce constraints on USDOT in this area. Give us a call, we can do some good work.”

Really? Prove it. The up-side of this is that Buttigieg, like Kamala Harris, is dashing any chances he might have had at being President by his repeated displays of incompetence. The down-side is that Biden will never fire this narcissistic hack because he is incompetent..

5. Regarding the dogshit-smearing star choreographer….It took a ridiculous five days, but Hanover’s main opera house finally fired Marco Goecke, its acclaimed German choreographer, after he slapped dog feces from his dachshund, Gustav, on the face of a dance critic whose review had displeased him. I suggested that the delay—Goeke was initially just suspended when he ought to have been fired for cause immediately—was triggered by “The King’s Pass,” rationalization #11 on the list, and it is clear that Goecke constantly benefits from that license to be a jerk. Goecke will retain his position as an associate choreographer with the Nederlands Dans Theater, an acclaimed Dutch company. The company said that Mr. Goecke’s behavior was “contrary to our values” but that he had apologized. Baloney. Smearing fecal matter on a critic is not just criminal but an attempt at intimidation. It is also signature significance: normal, stable, trustworthy choreographers don’t do that ever, not even once. His apology is meaningless. and Goecke proved it by later saying that newspaper critics, he said, should not write in “a personal and hateful way.” So she deserved the shit in the puss, then? He also said, “If I’d been a woman and the critic a man, this would be seen differently.”

What an asshole.

Remember”Hoosiers,” where Gene Hackman plays a star college basketball coach who punched one of his players and could no longer get a coaching job except in a small Indiana high school? A professional choreographer, no matter how good he is, that physically attacks a critic should have to work his way back by choreographing high school “Nutcrackers,” if he’s allowed another chance at all.



9 thoughts on “Saturday Morning Ethics Warm-Up, 2/18/23: Palin, Pete, “Eco-grief,” Progressive Gun Law Schizophrenia And A Critic-Attacking Choreographer Update

  1. Re: No. 5; The Fecal Matters.

    Jack wrote, “It is also signature significance: normal, stable, trustworthy choreographers don’t do that ever, not even once.”

    I might suggest that “It is also signature significance: normal, stable, trustworthy individuals don’t do that ever, not even once.”

    jvb

    • A professional choreographer, no matter how good he is, that physically attacks a critic should have to work his way back by choreographing high school “Nutcrackers,” if he’s allowed anther chance at all.

      There’s no way I would have this guy around kids.

  2. Regarding Sara Palin: If there is one person in the U.S. who has no standing to advise anyone to “stay governor,” it’s her.
    Why not? One can view Palin’s statement as advising DeSantis to not repeat her mistake but to complete his term as governor.

  3. If I were a dedicated conspiracy theorist, I might conclude that Democrats want to have as many mass shootings as possible so they can finally ban guns, because obviously the laws “don’t work.”

    It is all about who actually finanes the anti-gun politicians.

    https://www.quora.com/Some-gun-control-supporters-seem-to-have-animus-against-all-non-cop-gun-owners-instead-of-just-muggers-and-carjackers-and-gang-members-Why-It-doesnt-make-sense

    This is an important question to answer, and what it boils down to are the motivations of the rank-and-file in contrast with the motivation of the spokesholes.

    The rank-and-file fear muggers and carjackers and gang members, just like you wrote. Sadly and tragically, for too many of these people, these fears have a compelling basis in reality.

    But for these spokesholes you write about, it is about their political identity.

    And their political identity tells them that the White male conservative is the enemy.

    What does this have to do with gun control laws?

    These people associate private gun ownership with the White male conservative. As such, gun control, to them, is a tool to hurt the White male conservative.

    This is why they have far more animus against Kyle Rittenhouse than the McMichaels, or Nikolas Cruz, or Tookie Williams, or Brian Mitchell, or Bernie Madoff. That is why they support decarceration and defunding the police. that is why they accuse cops of hunting down and gunning down unarmed Black men. That is why they accuse the criminal justice system of being systermically racist. Adn this is why they support gun control laws even though they would be enforced by these very same police in this very same system.

    But what do the motivations of the spokesholes matter? Why would their animus against White male conservatives matter regarding whether or not gun control laws will help reduce and punish urban violence, protect us from the mugger and the carjacker and the gang member?

    The answer is that the rank-and-file are not the group from whom most of the campaign contributions come from.

    It is the spokesholes.

    The people who administer and enforce the law will listen more to the spokeshoples, for their money talk much louder than the rank-and-file.

    And as such, we can expect these people to target the White male conservative, instead of the mugger and the carjacker and the gang member. That is whom their donors have animus against.

  4. On a related note.

    https://www.lansingstatejournal.com/story/news/2021/08/10/ingham-county-prosecutor-lessen-use-felony-firearm-charge/5555564001/

    Charging people with a felony firearms offense was supposed to dissuade people from carrying guns, but “all it did was disproportionately impact Black people,” Siemon said.

    “While this law was enacted in 1976 to deter gun violence, it has never lived up to its promise of keeping the public safer,” according to the release.

    In Michigan, 82% of people serving a sentence for a felony firearm charge are Black, despite Black people making up just 14% of the state’s population, according to the release. In Ingham County, 80% of the 269 people serving a felony firearm sentence are Black.

    In 2020, 205 felony firearm charges were issued by Siemon’s office. Of those, 67% were against Black people.

    “We applaud Prosecutor Carol Siemon’s decision to limit the use of charges under the mandatory minimum ‘felony firearm’ law,” John Cooper, director of Safe and Just Michigan, said in a statement. “Research shows that mandatory minimums and the felony firearm law have failed to deter the use or possession of firearms, and the racially disparate impact of firearm charges is well documented.”

  5. #3: The widespread practice of pleading away firearms charges against felons who’ve also committed other crimes has been a sore point with 2A rights advocates for years. It’s impossible to square that with demands that the law-abiding gun owners who have never, and likely never will, commit a serious crime, be burdened with more and more restrictions. The fiction that the one elusive magic law or regulation will be the one that stops the criminals and crazies becomes less and less believable, as does the claim that the proponents are just searching for “common sense” measures rather than attacking the Second Amendment..

    Tangential to this issue, and the mention the other day in a comment about Asian-descent children out-performing others academically, the previously low gun-owning Asian demographic is now a rapidly growing group of new owners.

    #4: Petey is similar to Kamala in spouting meaningless gibberish, he’s just better at making it appear that he seems to be saying something that makes sense. Like the person himself, when you actually look at it, there’s nothing there.

  6. The only defense I can think of for the opera house not firing him immediately is that when the accusation is as outrageous as smearing dogpoop on someone, you have to verify who is the lunatic. Did the director actually do it, or did the victim wholesale invent the episode?

    Someone in the exchange is unhinged, and we unfortunately live in an era where people make outrageous slanderous claims to get attention and sympathy. It wasn’t clear if there were witnesses in the articles I read, so cautious verification of facts is warranted if it were a he said/she said situation.

    Once the director clearly admitted he did it, though, no further investigation is necessary.

    • That’s a fair point.

      Going back to the Macalester College firing for showing an image of Mohamed, knee-jerk reactions are generally bad—and undoing them is puts you in weenie-land (not a porn reference).

      Slowing down and acting with deliberation and circumspection should be encouraged.

      -Jut

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.