A 12-year-old Boy And His Mother Refuse To Be Bullied By Woke School Administrators And Win

Notice the racist symbolism in that symbol above? No? That’s because there isn’t any, but never mind: Jayden Rodriguez, a 12-year-old middle-schooler in Colorado Springs, was kicked out of class at The Vanguard School, a local charter school, because he had a Gadsden flag patch on his backpack. Jayden was told he had to remove the patch before he would be admitted to the class again.

In an email, a school administrator claimed that the patch was “disruptive to the school environment.” Boy, do I ever remember getting upset over the patches fellow classmates had on their backpacks! This was, of course, an example of woke fascism by a teacher and a school, nothing more or less. Further emails from the school told the student’s mother that “some may now see the Gadsden flag as a symbol of intolerance and hate—or even racism.” Oh, well if “some” erroneously associate a historical symbol that had nothing whatsoever to do with slavery or racism as offensive, by all means punish the kid who knows what it really symbolizes. “Some” see the American flag as a symbol of white supremacy, imperialism, and systemic racism. They are welcome to their foolish opinion, but that doesn’t mean they should have the power to stop any sane American from displaying Old Glory.

The Gadsden flag is named after Christopher Gadsden, a South Carolina delegate to the Continental Congress and brigadier general in the Continental Army, who designed it. He gave the flag to Commodore Esek, who unfurled it on December 20, 1775, on the main mast of Esek’s flagship the USS Alfred. The flag was intended to communicate a warning to England, showing a snake (made up of the 13 colonies as illustrated in an earlier flag) ready to strike. The flag has been called the “most popular symbol of the American revolution.”

During a video of the meeting between the child’s mother and an administrator posted on social media, the mother was told, “The reason that we do not want the flag displayed is due to its origins with slavery and the slave trade.” The mother, who is clearly more educated and historically astute than the people she has allowed to instruct her child, disputes that false assertion, and asked if perhaps the administrator was mixing up the Gadsden Flag with the Confederate flag. (Heh!)

Neither student nor mother backed down, and the school received massivenegative attention on social media and conservative news media. (Radio silence from the Times, NPR and the networks so far. Funny about that.) Few supported the school’s decision, not even reliably woke Democratic Colorado Gov. Jared Polis , who tweeted, “The Gadsden flag is a proud symbol of the American revolution and [an] iconic warning to Britain or any government not to violate the liberties of Americans. It appears on popular American medallions and challenge coins through today and Ben Franklin also adopted it to symbolize the union of the 13 colonies. It’s a great teaching moment for a history lesson!”

“There is nothing inherently disruptive about a student displaying a Gadsden flag patch on his backpack,” wrote Aaron Terr, director of public advocacy at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). “Public school administrators can’t ban the expression of an idea, symbol, or viewpoint just because they personally dislike it.”

Now the school has backed down. Jayden can keep the patch, and is allowed back to class. But the school couldn’t resist trying a face-saving lie anyway. “There has been National media attention on our charter school, The Vanguard School, related to a student having the Gadsden flag on his backpack,” the school said in a statement. “Unfortunately, this story is incomplete. The patch in question was part of half a dozen other patches of semi-automatic weapons. The student has removed the semi-automatic patches. As a school district, we will continue to ensure all students and employees can learn and work in a safe and nurturing environment. The student returned to class without incident after removing the patches of semi-automatic weapons from the backpack. The Vanguard School and Harrison School District 2 worked in collaboration to resolve this matter.”

Suuuuure. If the school wasn’t wrongly and unconstitutionally punishing the student for displaying that Gadsden flag, why did it send all of the emails explaining why the patch was somehow disruptive and racist? Why did the administrator discuss that patch in the meeting with Jayden’s mother?

Ethics takeaways:

  • To all responsible parents currently sending their students to The Vanguard School, heed the wise counsel of the Amityville Horror house: “GET OUT!!!!”
  • This is an example of what can happen when those faced with woke bullying refuse to be weenies. Don’t apologize. Don’t surrender. Get the word out about what your aspiring masters from the extreme Left are trying to do.
  • The lying email after the incident is signature significance. This school is untrustworthy from top to bottom. How many other schools, charter or otherwise, are like this? My guess: most of them.

13 thoughts on “A 12-year-old Boy And His Mother Refuse To Be Bullied By Woke School Administrators And Win

  1. Interesting. Living, as we do, most of the time in The Gadsden Purchase, I just today found out James Gadsden, of Purchase fame, was the grandson of Christopher, of Flag fame. Also fascinating to find out James was a Yalie. class of 1806, and a member of The Brothers of Unity, a Yalie secret society. I’m surprised the Colorado school didn’t just say the Gadsden family owned slaves, or lived in THE slave state, or were privileged white people like the Bushes, or something, and therefore the flag had to go.

    I’m surprised the kid was picked on. He has a Spanish surname. Doesn’t that make him marginalized? But maybe he’s a white Hispanic. Boy, am I ever glad I got out of teaching high school English after a year and a half.

      • Woke Alert!
        Steve- O- just made a ricist exclusionary remark.
        In the interest of edification as opposed to cancellation of your entire universe Steve; please be mindful that brown rice also exists and should always receive the same attention as white rice.

        Have a nice day.

  2. It’s simple. The left is allowed to ban whatever symbols they don’t like, simply by calling them racist, but the right is not allowed to respond in kind. In fact, you aren’t allowed to force the pledge of allegiance to the American flag, but everyone must now bow and scrape before the Pride Flag, or be declared a bigot. To my knowledge, no one has actually written a pride flag pledge. The only pledges I’m aware of are the one to the American flag, the Christian flag, and to the Bible. Just for the record the latter two are:

    I pledge allegiance to the Christian Flag and to the Savior for whose Kingdom it stands. One Savior, crucified, risen, and coming again with life and liberty to all who believe.

    I pledge allegiance to the Bible, God’s Holy Word, I will make it a lamp unto my feet and a light unto my path and will hide its words in my heart that I might not sin against God.

    As far as I know, they are mostly only used by evangelical Protestants, since we Catholics fly the flag of the Vatican State rather than the “Christian flag” and of course the Jews fly the flag of Israel. It would be interesting to design other pledges, but so far I have not, since it would be hard to resist the desire to be snarky.

  3. Wouldn’t the Alfred‘s designation (if it had one) maybe have been something like “UCS” or “UCNS” rather than “USS” in 1775?

  4. This was in Colorado Springs. While the Greenies are trying to go as woke as Cali, Colorado Springs is not nearly as work as Denver (much less the stretch of insanity called Boulder). It is a military town. “Don’t tread on me” is not going to be accepted by much of the town as hate speech, and the school district has probably noticed that their problems are just beginning. I heard that they were cancelling certain school events because parents were up in arms over this.

    Good.

  5. Gadsden owned slaves! But…but…he is also buried in close quarters of John C. Calhoun!

    Do you give out a “bite me” of the month award? This would be the winner.

  6. What is “disruptive” about patches containing “semi-automatic weapons”? A stitched image somehow upends their “safe and nurturing environment?” If I were the parents, I would continue to publicize those patches and shame the school leaders who still got a (admittedly smaller) win. These are the same category of weenie who suspend kids for drawing something that vaguely looks like a gun.

  7. There is nothing more disingenuous, and no bigger threat to liberty and freedom, than the BS notions of needing to ensure “safe” environment and combat “hate speech”. They allow the left to suppress all dissent and any deviation from woke orthodoxy under the pretense of accommodating the most subjectively mentally weak and fragile.

Leave a reply to The Shadow Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.