CNN’s Brianna Kellar and the News Media’s “Think of the Children!” Refrain in Support of Hamas

Yes, it’s “Imagine” time again. Mainstream media talking heads and hacks have apparently been playing the John Lennon’s sweet and fatuous ode to nonsense over earbuds as they sleep, judging from the angle they repeatedly return to as they push anti-Israel propaganda on the public.

CNN’s Breanna Keilar had a typical “Think if the children!” exchange with Israeli spokeswoman Tal Heinrich yesterday.

Keilar (talking over and interrupting her guest as she Heinrich expressed regret that children in Gaza were being placed in harm’s way): “Tal, when you see those pictures coming out of Gaza, do you see why some people don’t have hope looking at those pictures?”

Heinrich: “Well, we are in the middle of a war that Israel did not start, and did not want.”

Keilar: “It is prosecuting it forcefully, and you see the pictures here.”

Heinrich: “When Hamas started this war — hope and peace and a better future for the region — that is the greatest enemy of terrorists. Once we eliminate these terrorists, we eliminate the rule. We hope that there will be other voices, pragmatic ones that want to work with us towards peace. This is what we want. We want to live in this region peacefully. That’s what Israelis have always wanted. But first, Hamas must be gone, and then we hope that the Palestinian society will de-radicalize. We can’t have — you know, what our troops are finding right now, on the ground, in certain neighborhoods in Gaza, pictures of children, women with guns, Hamas uniform tailored for children. And Hamas terrorists that we have arrested—”

Keilar (interrupting): “Does that make the children justifiable enemies to you? Is that what you’re saying? Does that make all of the children justifiable enemies to you? I mean, you’re raising the specter of them being used in military uniform.”

Heinrich: “This is not what I’m saying! I’m saying that a Hamas terrorist we are interrogating has admitted in the interrogation that Hamas are exploiting children, they’re using them to transport ammunition. That is outrageous! Where is UNICEF? No, of course not!”

What is going on in Gaza is called “war.” War is not good for anyone. War involves inflicting death, destruction and misery on an enemy until that enemy gives up. The objective in war is to end it as quickly as possible, and that is accomplished by doing exactly what Israel is doing to Gaza and Hamas, which started the war. Because Hamas, the government of Gaza, started the war, deliberately and ruthlessly with a heinous terrorist attack on civilians, families and children, any questions about the consequences Israel’s necessary, justified, and entirely predictable counter-attack should be asked of Hamas. Whatever happens to the people of Gaza, their children and their zoos as a result of the war Hamas started is completely and indisputably the fault of Hamas, and the citizens of Gaza who allowed a terrorist organization to be in control of their territory.

This shouldn’t be difficult to comprehend. Keilar’s interview with Heinrich featured a tone of voice, facial expressions and hostile witness cross-examination tactics that news show hosts typically reserve for unequivocal villains like David Duke, Louis Farrakhan or Republicans. If a newscaster doesn’t understand what war is, then a responsible broadcast news organization is obligated to keep that newscaster assigned to covering Taylor Swift concerts or cat shows. Get an adult to interview Israel spokespersons about the war.

“Do you see why some people don’t have hope looking at those pictures?” What kind of question is that? Hope for what? Israel is determined to make certain for all time that no more terror attacks, or attacks at all, come from Gaza. That means wiping out Hamas, which, as has been well established, regard children, like hospitals and the rest of Gaza’s population, as useful shields and propaganda tool. If the fanatic organization could ensure the destruction of Israel by sacrificing all of its children, it would.

Then the CNN host, acting as a Hamas agent, states that Israel is waging war “forcefully” as if that is unreasonable. Her objective, like the objective of so many of her colleagues, is to create public pressure for a truce, a ceasefire, or some other reduced response to an existential threat to Israel that will allow that threat to continue indefinitely. Realizing she is dealing with a journalist whose agenda is to vilify her country, Heinrich was forced to blather pablum, delivering the obligatory message that Israel “hopes” that once Hamas is eliminated, “Palestinian society will de-radicalize.” A competent journalist would have forced her guest to defend that fantasy; instead, Keilar jumped to “Think of the children!” That is a distraction from the reality of the war and a blatant appeal to emotion.

Keilar has plenty of company in this framing of the war. Obviously the CNN brass wants such distorted spin, or it wouldn’t tolerate it from Keilar or anyone else. She is one of the network’s most obvious progressive agents. The last time I examined one of her interviews, right around the time I decided that I couldn’t trust CNN and stopped watching it for news updates, was way back in 2015 when she allowed candidate Hillary Clinton to lie repeatedly without challenging her with the facts. Then I wrote,

[W]hat kind of interviewer is Keiler? All of the evidence discrediting Clinton’s lies and excuses are a matter of record: why didn’t she raise them on the spot? It’s her duty to do so, not to allow Clinton use her interview to misinform the public, but for CNN’s Keilar to use the interview to inform the public. Keiler should be fired for unprofessional conduct and incompetence. Since she was not, CNN must be judged complicit.

Eight years later, and that assessment is still accurate. Amusingly, Mediaite, which has approximately twice as many left-biased reporters as the other kind, cheered on Keilar with the story, “CNN’s Brianna Keilar Pulls No Punches When Questioning Israeli Spokeswoman: Are ‘Children Justifiable Enemies to You?’” Mediaite endorsed that unfair “gotcha!” question. Keilar pulled all her punches when she should have had Hillary Clinton on the ropes.

Ironically, we have seen that Hillary can explain the justification for Israel’s prosecution of the war quite effectively. It would be fun to see Keilar try the “Think of the children!” act on her.

4 thoughts on “CNN’s Brianna Kellar and the News Media’s “Think of the Children!” Refrain in Support of Hamas

  1. Hitler had boys as young as 12 out there fighting Russian tanks in their Hitler Youth uniforms. I wonder if Keilar objects to the Allies shooting back at them?

    War is terrible. Innocent people die. Children die. That’s why governments should be very careful about starting conflicts that could end very badly for their own people.

  2. What utter garbage. Man has been in and out of war for 6,000 years, since before Sargon of Akkad led his army of archers against the Sumerians. As long as there are finite amounts of wealth and power, there are going to be conflicts about those amounts. More often they don’t get farther than diplomatic conflicts, but if the diplomats can’t get to a resolution, then that’s when the generals and admirals get their shot, no pun intended. It’s a nasty business that risks destroying whatever it is the combatants are fighting about and does all kinds of damage. Lives get ended just as a result of being in the wrong place at the wrong, or the right place at the right time for the enemy. Lives that took decades to build get destroyed in seconds as homes and businesses explode or burn. That’s before we even talk about the risks to learning, culture, and history.

    Despite what some folks might think, most wars in history are not affairs of stupidity, fought over misunderstandings or issues that could have been easily resolved. Most wars were started by someone or several someones, with a definite goal in mind and a plan for achieving that goal. Most folks who started wars had created the plans for them long before and calculated whether they had the resources to win against the enemy they would face. Sometimes a win was inevitable, like when the newly-unified German Empire started attacking the crumbling Austro-Hungarians, the weak Danes, and the powerful but still inferior French. More often than not a war is a calculated risk that depends on a planned set of goals coming together completely within a given amount of time, after which the chances of victory will start to diminish. That’s what happened in the Revolution, when the colonies managed to keep the British on their back foot long enough that their diplomats were able to build a coalition that was too much for the British to beat. That’s what happened in the Civil War, when the United States had a set of goals it had to meet after which victory would become inevitable, but that it had to meet before its own people grew weary of war. Once Vicksburg fell and Fort Fisher fell, victory was inevitable because the sea lines of supply were cut. That’s also what happened in the Pacific, when the Japanese set themselves up to run amok for a limited time…after which if they did not win the US production machine would overwhelm them. Still they kept fighting on, thinking they might get the other side to decide it wasn’t worth it. Then came the Union advance on Richmond and the atomic bomb. The Germans did almost fight to the end, although they should have given up the ghost after the failure in the Ardennes. When your best plans come to nothing, you should give up the ghost and cut your losses.

    Hamas can’t really have had a plan for victory, any more than al Quaeda realistically had a plan for victory. They aren’t fighting foreign powers who they can wait out like the Taliban did. They have nothing like the numbers or the resources they would need to seriously conquer Israel. The only think they could possibly hope to win are political concessions, and that only by putting their own people in harm’s way. They started a war they could never win, which was going to get their own people killed, for a goal that it doesn’t look like they can achieve. What else is there to talk about?

    • Exactly. Hamas appears to fight its wars as PR campaigns, not military campaigns. Nearly everything it does is tailored to the court of “public opinion”, not any real battlefield objective.

Leave a reply to Steve-O-in-NJ Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.