Ethics Dunce (Still!): Harvard University

face

It’s quite possible, I think, that Harvard’s ethics rot is so entrenched and endemic that it can never be fixed, even by Barack Obama.

Here’s the latest revolting development. Harvard’s Interim President Alan Garber announced in an email that Professor of Jewish History in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences Derek Penslar will co-chair its new anti-Semitism task force, established to deal with the concerns of students, faculty, donors, elected officials and the public at large over demonstrations on the Harvard campus calling for the elimination of Israel and the murder of Jews.

Penslar is, shall we say, not the ideal candidate to encourage trust in the task force’s dedication to its task. He signed a letter in August accusing Israel of running a “regime of apartheid,” stating in part, “Without equal rights for all, whether in one state, two states, or in some other political framework, there is always a danger of dictatorship. There cannot be democracy for Jews in Israel as long as Palestinians live under a regime of apartheid, as Israeli legal experts have described it.” He has also said on more than pone occasion that the problem of anti-Semitism at Harvard is being exaggerated, while quickly pairing it with Islamophobia. “Yes, we have a problem with antisemitism at Harvard, just like we have a problem with Islamophobia and how students converse with each other,” Penslar said this month. “The problems are real. But outsiders took a very real problem and proceeded to exaggerate its scope.” Jewish Insider reported that Penslar told the Harvard Crimson in late December that the amount of media focus on anti-Semitism at Harvard has “obscured the vulnerability of pro-Palestinian students, who have faced harassment by actors outside of the University and verbal abuse on and near campus.”

Being “Pro-Palestinian” is the exact equivalent of advocating the killing of Jews, and will be until the official mission of Hamas and other Palestinian groups is altered to acknowledge Israel’s right to exist.

Why in the world, coming after the uproar caused by Harvard’s now ex-president telling Congress that whether anti-Semitic speech on campus constitutes harassment and a violation of university standards depends on “context,”would Harvard make this guy the chair of a task force supposedly created to address anti-Semitism?

Former Harvard President Larry Summers wrote on X/Twitter that he’s “lost confidence” in Harvard leadership. Oh-oh, Bruce is calling…

”After Friday’s new anti-Semitism task force announcement, I have lost confidence in the determination and ability of the Harvard Corporation and Harvard leadership to maintain Harvard as a place where Jews and Israelis can flourish,” Summers wrote. “I have no doubt that Prof Penslar is a profound scholar of Zionism and a person of good will without a trace of personal anti-Semitism who cares deeply about Harvard. However, I believe that given his record, he is unsuited to leading a task force whose function is to combat what is seen by many as a serious anti-Semitism problem at Harvard,” Summers continued. “Prof Penslar has publicly minimized Harvard’s anti-Semitism problem, rejected the definition used by the US government in recent years of anti-Semitism as too broad, invoked the need for the concept of settler colonialism in analyzing Israel, referred to Israel as an apartheid state and more. While he does not support BDS he has made clear that he sees it as a reasonable position.”

I’m trying to think of a hypothetical equivalent to this bone-headed appointment. It might be a fun game. What would you suggest?

10 thoughts on “Ethics Dunce (Still!): Harvard University

  1. The cognitive dissonance in Summers’s letter is almost overwhelming. “I think Prof. Penslar is a person of goodwill and not anti-Semitic, although he has engaged in profoundly anti-Semitic conduct and expression.”

    • Great point. How does one reach the conclusion that someone who has “engaged in profoundly anti-Semitic conduct and expression” isn’t anti-Semitic and is a person of good will? Would Summers say that someone who has repeatedly criticized “niggers” is not a racist? #64: “It isn’t what it is.”

Leave a reply to Sarah B. Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.