Integrity Test For Climate Change Hysterics

Well waddya know! The U.S. is on the verge of setting records for all-time low temperatures in May. That’s funny. I thought humanity was doomed because the world is burning up.

Of course, I don’t think one unseasonally cold month has any more significance than one unseasonably cold day, but that’s not how the climate change cabal has been playing their game. No, every time the temperature seems especially high anywhere in the USA, the activists, most of whom know as much about climate science as I know about fixing a carburetor, start screaming, pointing, and crying out, “See? SEE?” They do the same thing with seasonal wildfires, hurricanes, floods and, at least on The View, earthquakes and eclipses. They get away with it too, because the unscrupulous politicians they elect and the dim-bulb progressive pundits and reporters who work for those politicians always endorse and rationalize the climate change hysterics’ propaganda, even after every prediction, every projection, every deadline to save humanity proves to be hooey.

These relentless peddlers of fake Armageddon even continue to bleat about “trusting the science” and “consensus in the scientific community” when the failure of reality to live up to the ideologically-motivated pronouncements of researchers and scientists advancing their own agendas—More grants, please!—is vividly, throbbingly obvious.

Just once—once!—I would like to hear one of these aspiring leftist totalitarians react to news that undercuts their fear-mongering by admitting, “Okay, I admit it: we don’t know enough about what affects the climate to be as obnoxious and doctrinaire as we are about the supposed evidence of climate change or how to respond to it. Sorry. We’ve been hyping, environmentalists have been hyping, the scientists have been hyping, the Democrats have been hyping.”

But I won’t hear that, will I? I won’t because the real objective is to use Climate Change Doomsaying as the device to bring about world government if possible, or U.S. domination by a totalitarian-minded Democratic Party if that can’t be achieved.

These people, including the scientists whose tarnished authority they lean on, have no integrity. It’s really that simple.

9 thoughts on “Integrity Test For Climate Change Hysterics

  1. Just a climatic observation. It is the end of May and my pool has not wrmed up enough for me to use it. I’m pissed! I have missed a month of aquatic frolicing because the climate predictors are mendacious.

  2. It just won’t stop raining in Indiana.

    Honestly. We’ve had no Spring. It’s cold and wet and doesn’t stop.

    • Clearly you need more carbon emissions per Hoosier.

      Build some coal plants. Burn a few car lots worth of tires.

      Do something!

      Use this opportunity to add to Indiana’s rainy day fund.

      Build an umbrella factory.

      Hmmm, maybe talk to Trump about imposing tariffs on clouds. Those crafty Canadians are probably sneaking them past the border.

      Speaking of umbrellas, maybe you could petition the US Space Force to put a really big umbrella over Indiana.

  3. Perhaps our “climate mitigation” strategies have been too effective: all that time, money, and aggravation are finally paying off. We’ve stopped global warming!

    I don’t believe this, of course; just taking the climate hysterics’ thinking to its “logical” conclusion.

    No one wants pollution but the idea that we can affect the climate in any appreciable way through perfunctory rituals is a form civilizational narcissism. See also: the Covid Cult.

  4. Somebody send a thank you card, to Greta Thunberg! Maybe we can reach out to Al Gore, and make him relevant, somehow.

  5. Global Warming? I think I might be FOR it.

    I’m pretty sure another Ice Age would be way worse for humanity.

    –Dwayne

Leave a reply to Dwayne N. Zechman Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.