The Unmasking of Dr. Anthony Fauci. Ethics Villain

It was suggested that I lead this post off with this now well-circulated meme…

…but to me, it is too kindly and trivializes the villainy of the man. The old Ethics Alarms reliable, the unmasking of Lon Cheney in “The Phantom of the Opera,” better expresses just how repugnant his conduct has been.

If you are shocked—shocked!—to learn that Fauci is a celebrity-obsessed liar and unapologetic villain, you haven’t been paying attention or you just aren’t very bright. You certainly haven’t been following Ethics Alarms very long. I’m embarrassed that it took me as long as it did to write a full post about how despicable Fauci was, though by mid-summer 2020 I had figured it all out thanks to the photo of him maskless with two companions at a Nationals baseball game, where he had ostentatiously thrown out the first pitch (like a little girl) while wearing his virtue-signaling mask at least 60 feet from any other human being.

Here is Fauci’s EA dossier, more negative than that of almost any public figure, including the Clintons. I already took a victory lap for pegging Fauci for what he was this April, so I will spare you another “I told you so.” That month, Anthony Fauci’s former adviser David Morens was indicted and charged with one count of conspiracy, two counts of destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in federal investigations and two counts of concealment, removal, or mutilation of records relating to the origins of the Wuhan virus. He faces up to 51 years in prison. I wrote, “If Morens is guilty so is Fauci, who denied under oath that he funded ‘gain of function’ experiments that modified bat coronaviruses in the same city where the pandemic started.”

Sen. Rand Paul came to the same conclusion, not that it was elusive. In his excellent recitation of Fauci’s betrayal of trust and the public this morning as the doctor who proclaimed himself the personification of science was called to account, Paul said in part,

“There will be another pandemic. There will be another crisis. And there will again be officials that insist uncertainty must be hidden for the public’s own good. They will demand obedience. They will invoke science. “I am the science!” as though it were a commandment. They will argue that government officials cannot be questioned, because questioning them would undermine public trust. They have it backwards. It is secrecy that destroys trust. It is arrogance that destroys trust. It is censorship that destroys trust. And it is the refusal to admit error that destroys trust. That loss of trust may be your most damaging legacy.”

19 thoughts on “The Unmasking of Dr. Anthony Fauci. Ethics Villain

  1. that we can’t trust journalists, educators, professors, historians, journalists (duh), lawyers, and, as I have recently learned to my sorrow, legal ethicists.

    You listed journalists twice. Anyway, sorry to play devil’s advocate, but since Biden’s pardon means nothing can happen to him, what is the point of bringing Fauci before Congress? Why not just let his diary speak for itself? Or is there hope he could provide dirt on David Morens or others involved?

  2. You are still giving Fauci more credit that he deserves. When the coronavirus research was being done at UNC, it escaped the lab. It was contained, and the researchers, of course, said this was actually a good thing, because they now could make their protocols better. Then it go out again. Again, they said they now knew how it got out and it wouldn’t happen again. Then it got out again. That is why gain of function research was banned in the first place. This project was the reason.

    Of course, the deep state at NIH wasn’t going to follow regulation by Congress. They were above that. They gave the funding to Peter Dazak and EcoHealth Alliance who shuttled the researach to Wuhan, in partnership with the PLA.

    Fauci knew all of this. There was no guesswork of where this came from. He knew all along. All those panels to determine the source of the infection weren’t to tell Fauci where it came from, it was to determine if anyone else could figure it out. When it turned out that it was pretty obvious where it came from, he began the coverup. The evidence was in plain sight. Ted Cruz read off the grants to EcoHealth Alliance to Wuhan in the Senate in the spring of 2020!

    Fauci and Collins had science journals change results to support the narrative. When a CDC study on the effectiveness of masks found that masks do nothing to stop the spread, the researchers were ordered to withdraw the paper and apologize. When the Great Barrington Declaration tried to claw back some semblance of scientific objectivity, a letter written by Peter Dazak and his staff was published in science journals and in the press as evidence that the ‘scientific consensus’ was against it. Although these journals have since ‘apologized’ for their ‘lapse in judgement’, they knew where all this came from. They knew the truth and they lied.

    Fauci was also involved in the Moderna vaccine. Moderna had never had a product before, this was it. They finished the vaccine in 2018, but without a use, they would soon have gone out of business. In 2020, they only had to make small changes to account for the small mutations of the virus, that is how they were able to make the vaccine so fast. They had spent years doing it and finished it in 2018.

    Fauci knew all of this. He knew all along. All the talk about if this was a man-made virus, whether this was gain-of-function research is pure gaslighting and they are still doing it.

    All of the deaths that happened are on his hands and the hands of all the people who covered up the truth. That includes Fauci, Collins, the entire NIH, and the entire scientific publishing industry.

    I knew all this by 2021. I have been aghast that people have been absorbing the lies when the truth was out there, plain to see. You just had to accept the fact that all our ‘authorities’ were lying. It required critical thinking skills and those are obviously few and far between. I am amazed that people are not willing to accept that their leaders are obviously evil.

    I have been very disappointed in the research professors that rolled over by government mandate. I had noticed the decline in quality of scientific research and researchers over the previous 25 years. I thought it was just a consequence of politicians trying to ‘spread out’ the research money to more constituency. This diminished the quality of research and the originality of the research. Now, I wonder if it wasn’t an intentional decision to neutralize the independent scientific voice. During the Challenger inquiry, they put Richard Feynman on the board. When they put the final report before him, it was a whitewash. It blamed the very lower-level people who had sounded the alarm and were ignored and glorified the higher-level people who arrogantly and ignorantly ignored the warnings. Feynman refused to sign. He wrote his own, separate report, and published it. They couldn’t control him. He was a famous scientist nearing retirement. What could they do to him other than kill him? They couldn’t threaten his career or grants or his personal finances or his reputation. I wonder if the government saw this and decided to neutralize this threat to their narrative. Intentional or not, they have proven that they have neutralized it.

    If you wonder if people knew, it wasn’t just me. During a faculty meeting in 2021, a humanities professor stood up and stated “This university should be ashamed. The only department that is ‘antivax’ is our science department. Why are we tolerating a science department that is antiscience!” I also received an e-mail that wasn’t meant for me that year. It lambasted me for what I was telling the students about the Wuhan virus and the MRNA gene therapies. I was shocked. Who was this person and how did they know what I was telling my students? Then I figured it out. It wasn’t meant for me, it was meant for a professor at a university 1500 miles away. I noted that it seems the non-research faculty know, so the research faculty know as well, they are just lying about it.

    You are still giving Fauci too much credit.

      • Yet Holy Cross renamed a science building after him. HC produced some genuine heroes, like Joseph O’Callaghan, Bernard Trainor, Christopher Mahoney (our first four-star officer) and two classmates of mine who were a career FBI agent and a Chicago FD Deputy District Chief, but Fauci isn’t part of that company.

        I think in some ways he’s as bad as Bernie Madoff, destroying lives and careers and businesses for the sake of power, but at least Madoff wasn’t a double standards slug, ticketing mothers for walking their kids in the park to stave off cabin fever but being perfectly ok with violent protests.

      • Well, all previous trials of the MRNA vaccine killed every animal subject upon later exposure. 100%. They thought they had it fixed in people, so they got the government to waive the animal trials. The public was the animal trial. If they had been wrong, everyone who got the vaccine would have died. Every single one. What should be done to such a person?

  3. “Perjury trap” is literally an oxymoron. Anyone with a functioning brain knows that, although to be fair, his lawyers probably insisted he use that fake term of art.

    I love that Rand Paul threw out that one lawyer. If you’re taking the fifth, neither you or your lawyer should sermonize in non-responsive lawyerspeak instead of simply shutting the hell up.

    The whole l’affaire de COVID and its aftermath was a farce, and Fauci should be ashamed of his starring role in it. He acted like a star-struck little girl during COVID and helped do grave harm to the country, and refuses any accountability for his actions.

    In fact, the rise of the communists (oops, “Democratic Socialists”) are a direct result of his machinations, not to mention the closely related ethics fiascoes of the BLM riots and the rise of DEI. Every one of these things can be traced back to the COVID response, and he was driving that clown car. Remember how the race riots were somehow not spreading disease but attending church or surfing on an empty beach was?

    He may be the most consequential ethics villain in the 21st century. Not exactly something I would want on my epitaph.

    • I had never heard the term until defenders of Bill Clinton started throwing it around. As you know, this was one of the reasons I started my first ethics website, “The Ethics Scoreboard.” It is, of course, ridiculous. No one is “tricked” into committing perjury. What the term literally means is that a witness thinks he can lie and deta way with it, but he doesn’t realize that they have the facts, and the lie will be exposed. Poor guy! How dare they?

    • “He acted like a star-struck little girl during COVID and helped do grave harm to the country, and refuses any accountability for his action”

      “I want all of the credit and none of the blame” ~ Michael Scott.

  4. “The mask nearly fell off when the same “experts” [who had] insisted that white people avoid groups larger than five declared that there was an exception for George Floyd mobs because, see, racism is a public health threat.”

    And they made sure to claim that the African-American community was more vulnerable to Covid because racism. Their allies in the news media skewed their reporting, as well. Lockdown protestors were “most not wearing masks or practicing social distancing” while the BLM/Floyd rioters were “most wearing masks”.

    I have no doubt Covid was dangerous to the elderly and people with compromised immune systems, just as the flu is dangerous to those same people. I also understand that some people let Covid go untreated until it became too serious. That’s what happened to one of Mr. Golden’s co-workers who got sick, didn’t get treatment, ended up hospitalized and whose spouse dug in his heels on putting her on a ventilator until it was too late. It’s heartbreaking when there are deaths, especially preventable ones.

    Democrats ignored the Pandemic until the stock market starting slipping, then quickly seized on shutting everything down for as long as possible to harm the strong economy and, by extension, harm Trump’s re-election chances. They blatantly ignored their own orders while demanding that everyone else follow it without question. The media was complicit in this. They pooh-poohed the idea of a viable vaccine until after the 2020 election, then pushed it as strenuously as they had the lockdowns. This was a politicized pandemic, weaponized against the Trump administration to cause it to lose the election and has caused damage that we probably won’t fully be able to tabulate for another generation. The economy, education and overall health of our country still hasn’t recovered and neither has the supply chain. Trust in our institutions is at an all-time low thanks to these villains.

  5. Funding change of function research was banned. Fauci funded change of function research overseas despite the ban. Good morning, good afternoon, and goodnight.

  6. I read widely around that time, and there were reliable sources saying the fatality rate was extremely low for healthy people. The stats also didn’t account for people who were terminal and had accelerated deaths vs someone just keeling over.

    Anyway, sometimes you can just tell when someone is lying. The moment I fully realized was the about face on the masks. I don’t know if you remember, but were told before the lockdowns and such that simple masks didn’t do much and wouldn’t really prevent transmission. Then, it shifted.

    Fauci always seemed like a shyster to me. He is the type of person that would work in a university. People with a weird bookish kind of intelligence who can literally do nothing else and are incompetent fools in every other way. The Great Barrington declaration turned out to be the truth after all.

  7. Jonathan Turley has come out in favor of granting Fauci immunity. The Sound of Silence: Fauci Takes the Fifth and the Heat Over his Diary Disclosures – JONATHAN TURLEY

    Which might make sense. The public really does deserve answers.

    Of course, if he came clean, tons of other people would be prosecuted. I suspect he’d rather remain in the position he’s in right now. Being able to plead the Fifth keeps him from having to come clean and name names or at least put names in a damning light.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.