Well, that may be a bit over-stated, though not in the parlance of the Democratic Party and its propaganda agents in the news media. What Gallup really found, in its annual survey of U.S. values and beliefs, is that social conservatism is on the rise, and has reached its highest level in a decade, since 2012. Gee…what…a…surprise…
Gallup, being, as much as it tries to fight it, also infected with partisan bias, doubletalks its explanation for charts like these:
No, you idiots, the Boston Red Sox did not demote a major league pitcher because he said “something publicly that goes against what the Leftist elites want you to believe.” This totally manufactured “gotcha!” story, initially pushed by the only intermittently reliable New York Post (meaning it isn’t reliable at all, which made it easy for the pro-Biden censors to hide the Hunter Biden laptop story) was flogged to death by P.J. Media’s Robert Spencer. Its gist: Matt Dermody, who started Boston’s final game last week in a series against the Cleveland Indi–sorry, Guardians, was demoted after the game “because he has dared to depart from our insane society’s wholehearted worship of sexual deviance.”
I venture to conclude that Spencer didn’t watch the game. You see, I did. You had to be watching from the National Anthem, because Dermody was only around for three innings, and even that was touch-and-go. I also was aware of a controversy in “Red Sox Nation” over Dermody being brought up from the minor leagues to start that game, but it had nothing to do with his social media comments in 2021. Oh, the usual suspects like the Boston Globe tried to assail the team for even signing a pitcher who wouldn’t wave a rainbow flag, but the real problem with the move was that it made no sense as a baseball tactic. The Red Sox have been in a protracted slump, they had fallen into last place in the hyper-competitive American League East, and they needed a win to stay above .500 and to win the series, which was tied 1-1. Cleveland is a weaker team than the Sox (though they are in second place in the pathetic AL Central), but the Sox still needed a competent performance from whomever they started.
Dermody, it was obvious from the moment the announcement was made that he was being brought up from Worchester, wasn’t likely to provide it. He is a 31-year-old retread who had been forgettable in four brief stints with the Blue Jays and Cubs and hadn’t even been getting batters out in the minors. Every Red Sox fan, as well as a Red Sox beat writer who has been my friend for 20 years, thought the decision to use him was asinine….and it had nothing, nada, zilch to do with his views regarding gays.
For the record, I am royally sick of this topic already, and it’s just starting, with more than a year to go. I’m sick of Trump, I’m sick of the Democrats’ “destroy the village to save it” obsession with stopping Trump without just winning elections fairly and squarely, and I’m sick of the hypocrisy on all sides, and I’m really sick of reading obnoxious comments in moderation from single-minded ignoramuses who won’t even try to examine all sides of a complex issue, probably because they aren’t capable of it.
Sure, I’ll double down. I wrote on Friday that the decision to indict Trump was wildly irresponsible (if you didn’t discern that from my comparison to cloning dinosaurs, maybe you need to find another blog to hang out at) and was a utilitarian botch of existential proportions, and the tsunami is already developing, as that tweet above from a generally perceptive conservative Twitter wag indicates. Also predictably, gloating Democrats are tossing more of the afore-mentioned jet fuel on the fire, like this asshole:
Yecchhh. But let’s dig in…
1. The last post on this matter has surpassed the number of comments that allow normal people to read them all, so I’ll be overlapping a bit. For example, Alan Dershowitz also framed the indictment as I did, writing in Newsweek that it was “The Most Dangerous Indictment in History,” and saying in part,
This moment portends a massive change in the norms of this nation that all Americans who care about the neutral rule of law should pay close attention to, for it raises the specter of the partisan weaponization of the criminal justice system—not just by the Democrats targeting Trump but by Republicans who will certainly retaliate when they regain control of the criminal charging process.
That is how a large proportion of the public will regard it, and the evidence is irrelevant. Dershowitz also reminded me of Big Lie #6, “Trump’s Defiance Of Norms Is A Threat To Democracy.”
Remember? Democrats are hoping you won’t, but throughout the Trump Presidency, the accusation from the “resistance”/Democratic Party/mainstream media alliance (The Axis of Unethical Conduct) was that Trump was undermining democracy by not following unwritten “norms”—you know, like not using impeachment as a partisan tactic, not attempting to de-legitimatize the President, his election, and the Supreme Court, not weaponizing a health emergency to justify loosening election integrity measures, not intentionally violating the Constitution with Executive Orders like the one requiring Federal workers to be vaccinated, not giving a national speech declaring anyone who opposes his policies of being fascists and dangers to democracy…wait, I’m sorry! Those were some of the norms Democrats chose to defy; I get confused sometimes. My point is that the hypocrisy is staggering. There is a reason no former President or current major Presidential constender has ever been arrested or indicted by the rival party: it reeks of Third World dictatorships, and almost guarantees dangerous national division. This is why Gerald Ford pardoned Richard Nixon.
1. I banned a troll today. The relatively new commenter kept pretending not to understand my point introducing the Open Forum, which was that for the Biden Administration’s now indisputably partisan and politicized Justice Department to indict its Democratic President’s chief rival for essentially the same conduct that Biden engaged in was “throwing jet fuel” on what is already a highly combustible political division in the country, and thus reckless and irresponsible. The now-banned commenter kept pointing to technical distinctions and differences in details between Biden’s misappropriation of classified documents and Trump’s, which misses the ethics point, either deliberately (trolling) or stupidly.
I remember former Interior Secretary James Watt well: he was the most embarrassing Reagan appointee, a far right religious fanatic who was incapable of knowing when to keep his faith out his duties, or when to shut up. When he accused the Beach Boys of being poor representatives of the U.S. in the July 4th celebration on the Mall and recommended Wayne Newton as a replacement, I realized he was the kind of reactionary extremist that gave conservatives a bad name, and that he was so estranged from the U.S. culture that he wouldn’t last. He didn’t.
But the New York Times obituary demonstrates how even wackos in the throes of paranoia about progressives can prove prophetic, and how the current extremist Left—like the Times—can’t perceive the problems with their own obsessions.
Ann’s readers manage to touch on anything else I could say. You’ll enjoy their analysis.
Doyle: You dumb guinea.
Cloudy: How the hell did I know he had a knife?
Doyle: Never trust a nigger.
Cloudy: He coulda been white!
Doyle: Never trust anyone.That exchange has been excised from the versions of the film used on Turner Classic Movies, iTunes and Criterion. The film’s distributor, 20th Century Fox, was acquired by Disney before the scene disappeared. It is artistic censorship, straight up; no more acceptable than painting over the breasts Reubens paintings, or bleeping out “damn” is Rhett Butler’s famous kiss-off to Scarlet (as was done regularly when the movie began being shown on network television.)
Again, we are faced with deciding whether the motives here were stupid or sinister. I probably vote for both. The accelerating effort to declare the word “nigger” as taboo regardless of intent, use or context is pure attempted mind-control and Orwellian WrongThink totalitarianism—now embraced, as in other totalitarian tactics, by most of the Left and the Democratic Party. It is also unprincipled pandering to Critical Race Theory extremism. The rational mind boggles at what canonical works of art and literature face permanent scarring if the practice is allowed to take hold. Just off the top of my recently repaired head, I can think of several superb films that include “nigger” in the dialogue, like “The Shining,” “In the Heat of the Night,” “To Kill a Mockingbird,” “Mississippi Burning,” “Pulp Fiction,” and of course, “Blazing Saddles.”
Early in William Friedkin’s classic film “The French Connection,” Jimmy “Popeye” Doyle (Gene Hackman) argues with his partner, Buddy “Cloudy” Russo (Roy Scheider) regarding Russo recently sustaining a knife wound in a confrontation with a black drug-dealer:
Doyle: You dumb guinea.
Cloudy: How the hell did I know he had a knife?
Doyle: Never trust a nigger.
Cloudy: He coulda been white!
Doyle: Never trust anyone.That exchange has been excised from the versions of the film used on Turner Classic Movies, iTunes and Criterion. The film’s distributor, 20th Century Fox, was acquired by Disney before the scene disappeared. It is artistic censorship, straight up; no more acceptable than painting over the breasts Reubens paintings, or bleeping out “damn” is Rhett Butler’s famous kiss-off to Scarlet (as was done regularly when the movie began being shown on network television.)
Again, we are faced with deciding whether the motives here were stupid or sinister. I probably vote for both. The accelerating effort to declare the word “nigger” as taboo regardless of intent, use or context is pure attempted mind-control and Orwellian WrongThink totalitarianism—now embraced, as in other totalitarian tactics, by most of the Left and the Democratic Party. It is also unprincipled pandering to Critical Race Theory extremism. The rational mind boggles at what canonical works of art and literature face permanent scarring if the practice is allowed to take hold. Just off the top of my recently repaired head, I can think of several superb films that include “nigger” in the dialogue, like “The Shining,” “In the Heat of the Night,” “To Kill a Mockingbird,” “Mississippi Burning,” “Pulp Fiction,” and of course, “Blazing Saddles.”
I can’t imagine what ethics matters you’ll talk about today, as there is so much to choose from. Me, I’d be sorely tempted to draw an analogy between the now completely partisan Justice Department indicting the primary threat to Democratic power for conduct identical to what their own President has engaged in, essentially throwing jet fuel on what is already a highly combustible political division, and irresponsible flea-circus entrepreneurs reintroducing dinosaurs into the food chain.
But you know me: everything reminds me of baseball, old movies, or dinosaurs…
(Yes, it made my head explode.)
Hot on the heels of the news this week that owners of the 1,921-room Hilton San Francisco Union Square, San Francisco’s largest hotel, occupying an entire city block, is being abandoned by its owners because that woke city has become such a hopeless hell-hole that they can’t see the convention and tourism business rebounding comes New York City’s health officials installing the city’s first free drug paraphernalia vending machine in Brooklyn. It features all sorts of goodies for users and addicts, like crack pipes, “Safer Sniffing” kits, drug testing kits and the anti-overdose medication Naloxone. The vending machine also has hygiene kits for the special problems addicts face (like cracked lips) and safe sex kits. Anyone with a New York City ZIP code can claim any of the contents for no charge. The Brooklyn vending machine is the first of four machines that will be installed in neighborhoods that were hit hardest by the opioid crisis.
Wow, what a great idea. I think it’s a great idea. Don’t you think it’s a great idea?
It’s a conundrum: the more comments a post attracts, the more optimistic I am that I’m not wasting my time. But once the number of comments tops about 20, the chances of them being read diminishes rapidly. Generally I am a poor judge of which posts will generate the most dialogue; this time, I wasn’t surprised. The question of whether one of the Manson cult murders should be paroled raises ethics issues general and specific, including some that have caused arguments for centuries. Not only has it sparked 87 comments to date, the topic inspired so many Comment of the Day-worthy posts that if I posted them individually they would swallow the blog.
So, in order both to facilitate reading the highlights of the discussion and to give the best of the best exposure to a larger audience, what follows are the Comments of the Day by on the post “Ethics Quiz: The Rehabilitated Manson Cult Murderer,” by Steve-O-in NJ, Steve Witherspoon, Humble Talent, Ryan Harkins, Tim Levier, Alicia, Extradiminsional Cephalopod and Tom P. though I recommend reading all 87, even if they include two esteemed EA commenters taking shots at each other like the Earps and the Clantons. (You might want to read the original post, too.)
First up is Steve-O-in NJ:
Now Steve Witherspoon…
I suspect that there are quite a few companies that I would have to cease dealing with if I investigated their charitable contributions and the activities of their foundations. Maybe I should. Maybe it’s irresponsible not to. However, I don’t use Target enough for the objects of its generosity to get priority over the sock drawer. Now that I know, however—well, as Kramer says in “The Contest,” “I’m out.”
Fox News’ investigation—it wasn’t hard— found that Target’s nonprofit foundation has funded the NDN Collective, a South Dakota-based nonprofit that approaches its mission with a “racial equity lens,” being “dedicated to building Indigenous power [t]hrough organizing, activism, philanthropy, grantmaking… and narrative change.” NDN embraces “intersectionality,” a critical race theory staple, holding that America is poisoned with structurally racist and misogynistic systems, that combine to create persistent cultural persecution. The organization’s “LANDBACK” campaign, a parallel movement to reparations for slavery, wants the U.S. to give back its public lands.”The closure of Mount Rushmore, return of that land and all public lands in the Black Hills, South Dakota is our cornerstone battle,” NDN proclaims. “Not only does Mount Rushmore sit in the heart of the sacred Black Hills, but it is an international symbol of White supremacy and colonization. To truly dismantle white supremacy and systems of oppression, we have to go back to the roots. Which, for us, is putting Indigenous Lands back in Indigenous hands.”
Ethics Alarms 
Life in prison should mean life in prison. Some crimes are just so bad that the person who committed them should never be allowed to rejoin society. I think Charles Manson is the most undeserving recipient of the mercy that came with the temporary abolition of the death penalty whoever existed. I also think his followers, who, young as they might have been, we’re still old enough to be responsible for their actions deserved the same fate.
Don’t get me wrong, 54 years in prison is a damn long time. It’s longer than I’ve been alive, and the idea of spending all that time staring at concrete is very unpleasant. However, the families of those victims who were butchered should not have to see this person walking around free. Too often the victims and their families get forgotten in all of this. The victims here did not a thing. It isn’t as though they had bad blood with the offenders or had done something to the offenders. This is a case of someone who is as close to evil as any human ever was working his spell over other humans who let him work his spell on them and using that control to destroy lives who he really had nothing to do with and no reason to destroy. This is also a case of individuals who could still tell the difference between right and wrong choosing to go as wrong as any human possibly could. I say let this woman rot in prison for the rest of her days, I believe she should only be released if she is in the throes of a terminal disease and doesn’t have very long to live. Then by all means, release her to die.