The Monsters, the Baseball and the Kid

“WAAA! I wanted that ball! By the way, where am I?”

I skipped this ten-minute controversy from last month, but I think it was worth mentioning from several ethics angles, so consider this catch-up.

Rangers fans Sean Leonard and Shannon Moore were at a Texas Rangers-Yankee game a few weeks ago when a  game ball was tossed into the stands by Texas’s Mitch Moreland. They caught it and gleefully posed for the TV cameras, which also caught a three-year old boy crying hysterically next to them. Immediately, the couple was vilified far and wide, on TV, in blogs and on radio talk shows ( Business Insider called them “The Monsters Who Made A Little Boy Cry”)  for taking the ball and not giving it to the child. The main accuser  who sparked all this hatred was Yankees broadcaster Michael Kay, who told his radio audience that the couple was taunting the unhappy boy.

Outrageous, all right, but Kay, not the couple. Kay’s description of what occurred was speculative and even fanciful, and for other commentators to commence vilifying the two fans without knowing anything about them, or even why the child was crying, was frighteningly unfair, irresponsible and cruel. Yes, you too can be caught on camera and turned into a national punching bag! Later, we discovered that….

  • The kid was crying before the balls was tossed.
  • He almost certainly had no idea what was going on
  • Leonard and Moore have seven children of their own.

What utter monsters, to choose to give their treasure to one of their own children, rather than to the caterwauling child of a stranger!

The couple told reporters that they were not even aware of the kid in the heat of the moment, which seems plausible to me, not that any explanation or excuse is needed. We have seen other Rangers fans plunge to their death in the heat of similar moments, ignoring life, limb and gravity. If Leonard and Moore had chosen to give the ball to the tyke, good for them, though frankly, considering the age of the child, I think it would have been a wasted kindness. They certainly had no obligation to do so.  The ethics lesson of the episode isn’t “Be nice to kids” or “Always give away your baseball to the youngest person in the vicinity,” but rather “Don’t paint a giant target on the backs of people because you think would have handled a situation differently than they did when you don’t even know what the real situation was.”

And yes, I know that I need to practice that lesson myself, having fallen into the Michael Kay trap on occasion.

The episode did provoke some valuable ethics discussion,  including this piece, by Sam Miller, about the calculations that should go into an adult’s decision regarding whether to give a baseball to a child at the ballpark. His reflections, however, have little to do with these adults, this child, and that ball.


Pointer: Bob Kenney (Thanks, Bob.)


Graphics: MSNBC

Ethics Alarms attempts to give proper attribution and credit to all sources of facts, analysis and other assistance that go into its blog posts. If you are aware of one I missed, or believe your own work was used in any way without proper attribution, please contact me, Jack Marshall, at


Filed under Character, Journalism & Media

4 responses to “The Monsters, the Baseball and the Kid

  1. Bill

    The basic rule my brothers and I have is if its fould ball, and it usually is becuase we like to sit along the first base line just past the dugout, you give it to the nearest kid who is old enough to understand what is going on and to be a fan of a game. If it is a home run ball hit by our team we give it to the nearest kid who is fan of our team. If its hit by the opposing team and its a home run well we all know that gopes back on the field.

    Also what the hell was this kid doing along the first base line anyway? That is way too close for a kid to sit becuase of the danger of foul balls. Once at a Nat’s game at RFK I saw an adult male take a screaming foul ball right to the head becuase he was too busy explaining the game to his six year old instead of paying attention to what was happeneing on the field with the batter and the pitcher.

  2. Does Michael Kay appreciate the potential harm to others that he has the power to inflict? And on innocent strangers of whom he knows nothing? Does he care? Or is he angling to become the next Keith Olbermann?

  3. Ah! I should have thought of that.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s