What IS This? Ethics Dunce? Unethical Quote? Incompetent Elected Official Of The Month? Or Just A Congressman Inadvertently Exposing The Logical, Legal And Ethical Bankruptcy Of The Pro-Illegal Immigration Position?

I think we have to conclude that the latter is the case.

Representative Adriano Espaillat (D-N.Y.)—that’s him above—  condemned the anti-sanctuary city bill passed yesterday by the House of Representatives. H.R. 3003 would reduce sanctuary cities’  and states’ “eligibility to receive certain Department of Justice or Department of Homeland Security grants” when the cities or states were  “determined to be in violation of federal law.”

Espaillat thundered at the Democratic press conference yesterday on Capitol Hill that H.R. 3003 would have a “chilling effect” in local communities:

“People will go into hiding. People will not come forward to report crimes, and if we begin to deny funding to cities across the United States, a city like New York, who experienced 9/11, which has been the safest biggest city in the country since 9/11 because of the federal funding that we got to combat terrorism, providing for training, equipment, overtime pay for law enforcement, we will be allowing terrorists to come in and attack us again…So this is a travesty. This is a lie. We’ve been hijacked and bamboozled by Donald Trump and we should all stand up against this.”

Then Espaillat described sanctuary cities—that is, cities that encourage and endorse illegal immigration by announcing that they will protect illegals from any consequences of their breaking immigration laws—as compassionate communities that allow families to stay together regardless of immigration status without “fear,” using the false dichotomy that the proposed bill unfairly treated sanctuary cities as places that harbor illegal immigrants with criminal records.

“It is a safety net for people that are part of our family – they take care of our children, they wash our dishes, they take care of our elderly, they pick our crops…I’m not saying all of his followers are racist, but all of the racists in the country follow him and they have peddled this erroneous vision that immigrants are criminals. We all oppose any violent criminals not being arrested. We want them to be arrested and do their time in jail and go back to wherever they came from.”

Columnist George Will often follows a statement or quote that he believes is screamingly obvious nonsense by beginning his next paragraph with an arch and contemptuous,  “Well.” Seldom have I read or heard a more “Well”-deserving speech as Espaillat’s demogoguery.

Well.

1. Sanctuary cities undermine the rule of law. They should be punished, and punished severely enough that they stop defying the federal government and behave responsibly.

2.  It is irresponsible and a breach of duty for the federal government to allow sanctuary cities to continue this conduct. Mark it down as one more ideology-driven botch by the Obama Administration.

3. “People will go into hiding” if cities start enforcing the law rather than making it clear they don’t care if those people break it? You mean people like other law-breakers? The Horror. Every single dire consequence that Espaillat cites is applicable to other illegal activity.

4. Nothing will happen to ex-sanctuary cities that obey the law, as they are obligated to do. If they obey the law, there will be no lost funds, and no undesirable results of lost funds. A city that decides it is more dedicated to keeping illegal immigrants from apprehension than keeping its citizens safe only its warped priorities to blame.

5. The argument that deporting illegal immigrants is unconscionable because of its effects on families is the same as the argument that criminals shouldn’t be sent to prison because their families will suffer. Lessons: Don’t commit crimes if you care about your family. Don’t start families if you are in a country where you don’t belong.

6. “They take care of our children, they wash our dishes, they take care of our elderly, they pick our crops”-–Fascinating! A Hispanic-American Congressman is defining illegal immigrants as some sort of sub-citizen, those who are fit for stereotyped menial jobs that real citizens won’t do. (Hint: They will if they are paid what the job is worth, when there are no longer those sub-citizens who can be paid cheaply and under the table.)

7. Of course the Congressman delivers the racism canard, because that’s the last resort when terrible progressive arguments start looking as terrible as they are. It’s all racism. Enforcing the laws is racism. Ensuring the integrity of the borders is racism. Sure.

Are we reaching a point where even progressives are embarrassed by such rhetoric yet?

8. Finally, the Congressman scrapes the bottom of the barrel with the “Illegal immigrants are just immigrants” falsehood. Will we ever reach a point where even progressives are embarrassed by that?

9.  “We all oppose any violent criminals not being arrested.” Does that mean that “we” think that non-violent criminals should be left alone and welcomed with open arms? What else could it mean?

10. This kind of speech, this kind of rhetoric, this kind of elected Democrat and this kind of thinking on the Left are  the main reasons, above all the others, that Donald Trump is President. If the Democrats don’t stop talking like this, he will be President for eight, long, loooooong years.

 

 

14 Comments

Filed under Ethics Alarms Award Nominee, Ethics Dunces, Ethics Quotes, Ethics Train Wrecks, Government & Politics, Incompetent Elected Officials, Law & Law Enforcement, This Helps Explain Why Trump Is President

14 responses to “What IS This? Ethics Dunce? Unethical Quote? Incompetent Elected Official Of The Month? Or Just A Congressman Inadvertently Exposing The Logical, Legal And Ethical Bankruptcy Of The Pro-Illegal Immigration Position?

  1. Authentic Metropolitan Gibberish.

  2. luckyesteeyoreman

    “This kind of speech, this kind of rhetoric, this kind of elected Democrat and this kind of thinking on the Left are the main reasons, above all the others, that Donald Trump is President.”

    THAT’s what I was looking for, when I commented in an earlier thread.

    This must be another case where the solution for bad speech is MORE bad speech. /sarc

  3. LF wilburn

    Once again you hit the nail on the head with your last point.

  4. Other Bill

    “People will go into hiding. People will not come forward to report crimes.”

    This is trotted out all the time. Is there any truth to it? I watch the show called “The First Forty-Eight” quite a bit. The investigating detectives invariably tell the people they’re trying to get information from that they aren’t interested in busting them for the dope dealing or theft they’re involved in, they’re trying to solve a murder. Wouldn’t cops let immigration status just slide if they’re looking for a murderer? Alternatively, don’t the illegal immigrant gangs intimidate everyone so they don’t “snitch” anyway? If illegals were afraid to inform on criminals, would that make anything any different? Are there any studies supporting this constant claim?

  5. Jack Houghton

    My numbers may be a little out of date, but, as I recall the USA issues about one million green cards a year, another one million work visas that may be good for up to 6 years each, and many more million tourism visas. By most standards of the civilized world, the USA has a fairly liberal, legal immigration policy. This is good and desirable for the most part… the whole melting pot idea.

    I believe it is fair to say that the USA is the NUMBER ONE (Numero Ono) preferred destination in the entire world for people seeking a better life. This is understandable and a clear testament to the goodness and success of the American experiment.

    Here is the problem:

    On top of all the legal and liberally granted immigration we have, we have millions of foreign nationals who entered without any legal green card, work visa or tourism visa. Compounding this problem, we have many folk who overstay their work visas which may be good for up to 6 years and many other folks who enter the country as tourists and decide to stay. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see where this is going.

    Another problem is that the “melting pot” idea may not be working as well as it did in the past. If the numbers get out of hand, assimilation of diverse people into the American culture may not be incentivized enough and may not occur at all. Little enclaves of stubbornly un-American populations might just decide to reject the American values and pursue a fundamentally different model.

    For many years now, our political system has turned a blind eye to these issues and some of our most prominent politicians have tried to explain in exquisite Orwellian logic how this is somehow not a problem.

    Okay… given that the USA is the NUMBER ONE DESTINATION… What is stopping about 7.2 billion other people from wanting this kind of flexible immigration policy if it is to their advantage? Big houses, big cars, lots of stuff, and an increasingly generous taxpayer financed of aid for education, food, housing, telephones, and other things.

    Seems obvious to me that some in the USA political culture are fundamentally internationalists and really don’t think the idea of independent and sovereign nation states is a “fair” idea, preferring instead to let anybody who chooses go where ever they want when ever they want.

    What possibly could go wrong with this philosophy?

  6. Isaac

    “I’m not saying that every one of Obama’s supporters were members of NAMBLA, but all the NAMBLA members supported him.” Just trying my hand at some Espaillat logic.

  7. Tippy Scales

    Don’t want to be too gushy but….thank you for this website! It’s one of the few places to read cogent, nonpartisan material that calls out the bullshit on all sides. I don’t always agree with you — and I would be concerned if I did. But usually, as in this case, you nail it. Thank you.

  8. dragin_dragon

    I have pointed out before, and I am sure I will point out again, illegal aliens ARE, indeed, criminals. They became criminals when they crossed the border, without any sort of permission from the U.S. Government. By thus breaking the law, they became criminals.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s