Good Morning, all!
1 Dead Ethics Alarms on the Hill. Just as I cannot conceive of what kind of ethics alarm malfunction allows any man to think that parading his reproductive organs before unconsenting women in a work-related setting is anything but gross and wrong (Charlie Rose???), I cannot comprehend by what tortured logic an elected member of Congress reaches the conclusion that I should pay for his sexual harassment hobby. The latter is the height of arrogance and abuse of the public trust. Yet the Washington Post reported that Congress’s Office of Compliance paid out $17 million for 264 settlements with federal employees over the past 20 years for various violations, including sexual harassment, and now we have at least one name and specifics: John Conyers, the ranking member of the House Committee on the Judiciary. Perfect.
Michigan Rep. John Conyers, a Democrat and the longest-serving member of the House of Representatives, settled a wrongful dismissal complaint in 2015 with a former employee who alleged she was fired because she would not “succumb to [his] sexual advances.”
Documents from the complaint obtained by BuzzFeed News include four signed affidavits, three of which are notarized, from former staff members who allege that Conyers, the ranking Democrat on the powerful House Judiciary Committee, repeatedly made sexual advances to female staff that included requests for sex acts, contacting and transporting other women with whom they believed Conyers was having affairs, caressing their hands sexually, and rubbing their legs and backs in public. Four people involved with the case verified the documents are authentic….The woman who settled with Conyers launched the complaint with the Office of Compliance in 2014, alleging she was fired for refusing his sexual advances, and ended up facing a daunting process that ended with a confidentiality agreement in exchange for a settlement of more than $27,000. Her settlement, however, came from Conyers’ office budget rather than the designated fund for settlements.
Well, this section of the Harvey Weinstein Ethics Train Wreck is doing some good, by throwing some light on this unethical practice. Congressional sexual harassers need to pay their hush money out of their own pockets. That’s the least they can do.
2. Live from New York! It’s Double Standards Live! Although Saturday Night Live did have the integrity to mock alum Al Franken following the Senator’s sexual harassment accusations regarding his conduct when he was just an obnoxious comic, 36 SNL staffers, including original cast members Lorraine Newman and Jane Curtin, felt it was appropriate to release this letter:
SNL Women Offer Solidarity in Support of Al Franken
We feel compelled to stand up for Al Franken, whom we have all had the pleasure of working with over the years on Saturday Night Live (SNL). What Al did was stupid and foolish, and we think it was appropriate for him to apologize to Ms Tweeden, and to the public. In our experience, we know Al as a devoted and dedicated family man, a wonderful comedic performer, and an honorable public servant. That is why we are moved to quickly and directly affirm that after years of working with him, we would like to acknowledge that not one of us ever experienced any inappropriate behavior; and mention our sincere appreciation that he treated each of us with the utmost respect and regard.
We send our support and gratitude to Al and his family this Thanksgiving and holiday season.
Ugh. This is blatant Ethics Accounting, as if the fact that Al was fun to work with has anything to do with his misconduct, or mitigates it in any way:
21. Ethics Accounting, or “I’ve earned this”/ “I made up for that”. You cannot earn the right to act unethically by depositing a lot of ethical deeds in the imaginary ethics bank, nor can unethical conduct be erased by doing good for someone else. The illusion that one can balance the ethics books this way is referred to on the Ethics Alarms blog as “the Ruddigore Fallacy.” Nobody earns the right to be unethical, not even once, no matter how exemplary their conduct. An unethical act is just as unethical, whether it is performed by a saint, a hero, or a villain.
Even more ridiculous is the “he never harassed me!” bit. This is reminiscent of Greta Van Susterin’s embarrassing defense of Roger Ailes, where she “stood up for” her boss and cast skepticism on his accusers because Greta had never been abused. The SNL letter drips with similar skepticism and bias. It is “appropriate” for Al to have apologized—never mind that the apology itself stunk on ice—and Al’s conduct may have been “stupid and foolish,” but come on, it wasn’t the worst thing.
What does standing up “in solidarity” mean, when it is in support of an accused harasser? It means “we don’t believe the victim, and anyway, we like the accused sufficiently that we will give him a pass.” I’m just guessing here, but I bet there are many, many women Harvey Weinstein worked with that he never molested, and that Louis C.K. hasn’t masturbated in front of every women he ever encountered. Those lucky women should sign a letter.
3. ” Gee, you mean I really have to pay it back?” In 19 states, government agencies can seize state-issued professional licenses from residents who default on their educational debts, while South Dakota suspends driver’s licenses for the same provocation. The tone of the New York Times article on the topic is disapproving, even though seven of the 19 states don’t use the laws that allow such suspensions, and the others mostly employ them as threats to get deadbeats to take their responsibilities seriously. Nobody in any of the states loses a license who sets up a payment schedule.
The entire article should ring alarms regarding an accelerating cultural pathology, one that denies that failing to meet obligations is anything to get upset about. In the legal profession, failure to make good faith efforts pay off financial obligations can prevent a law school grad from getting a law license. Why? Because defaulting on debts is deemed a serious character flaw implicating trust, that’s why, and such a conclusion is warranted. If I don’t pay my mortgage loan, I risk losing my house. The same is true of my car loan. Where did the idea come from that student loans should be any different?
Student loans are now the largest source of household debt outside of mortgages, and since the state can’t take back the degree, the license approach is completely reasonable and fair. The Times quotes Jeff Barth, a commissioner in South Dakota’s Minnehaha County, who argues that is is “better to have people gainfully employed.” “I don’t like people skipping out on their debts,” Barth said, “but the state is taking a pound of flesh.”
No, Jeff, the state taking a pound of flesh would mean that it repossessed the educated brains of student deadbeats. Taking away licenses sends a simple and essential ethics message: pay your debts, or suffer the consequences.
4. THIS is a CNN idiot…I think Ethics Alarms has demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt that pseudo-conservative, token Hispanic, NeverTrumper Ana Navarro is only a regular CNN contributor to serve as a clay pigeon in rigged liberal vs conservative “cross-fires,” and is, in fact, incompetent, to put it politely. Yesterday, she tweeted,
“I believe Donald Trump’s accusers. I believe Harvey Weinstein’s accusers. I believe Mark Halperin’s accusers. I believe Al Franken’s accuser. I believe Charlie Rose’s accusers. I believe Glenn Thrush’s accusers. I believe Roy Moore’s accusers. The last 1, they were also underage.”
To begin with, this is nauseating virtue signalling. Fair, just and intelligent people believe accusers, male or female, according to the evidence available, the demonstrated proclivities of the accused, and relevant facts on a case by case basis. The feminist cant that female accusers must be automatically believed when they accuse a man of sexual misconduct is prejudiced, unjust, unethical and dangerous on its face, leading to such horrors as the Duke Lacrosse fiasco, the false “Jackie” story by Rolling Stone, and persecution of innocent men on college campuses by the likes of Mattress Girl.
Oddly, Navarro managed to leave off the most prominent accusers of them all….
Funny about that.