THIS Is CNN. How Embarrassing…For You, Me, Ted Turner, James Madison, Gutenberg, Australopithecus, Everyone

I watched this jaw-dropping exchange this morning on CNN’s New Day, unable to process what I was seeing. An alleged debate between two evidently paid CNN commentators, moderated by Alisyn Camerota, supposedly a professional broadcaster, the exchange was neither enlightening, informed or vaguely like anything the Founders could have recognized as “the press.” The level of logic and expression has been exceeded on multiple Jerry Springer episodes. The Kardashians could top it.. on a lucid day. Throughout the interminable segment, the “moderator” made no effort to control the rhetoric, correct screamingly obvious errors,or insist on decorum.

I think the best approach is to have you read it, if you can. When the transcript became available, I realized that what I had seen was even worse than I thought at the time. I was going to challenge you to pick out the most idiotic statements, but that’s too easy: closing your eyes and pointing at the screen would work. Here’s a more worthy test: see if you can identify an intelligent statement, one that wouldn’t be out of place in a bar debate between a soused kindergarten teaching assistant and truck driver recovering from a closed head injury.

But first,a word about Ana Navarro. When CNN started using her as its token conservative in studio panel discussions, I assumed it was one more example of the mainstream media stacking the deck to ensure that the liberal message prevailed by finding the lamest conservatives possible. She’s wishy-washy, inarticulate, and smug. Then Trump was nominated, and CNN found it had a Trump-hating Republican representing the Right on every issue: perfect! Navarro doesn’t even try to hide her hatred of Trump—the CNN anchors don’t try very hard, but they do a better job than Anna.

On the other hand, she not a persuasive advocate for anything, and ridiculous more often than not. As you shall see:

7:38 a.m. ET

BEN FERGUSON, CNN POLITICAL COMMENTATOR: You have a right to do a lot of things in this country, and there are consequences, and the NFL got it wrong. The NFL got out and tried to play both sides of this issue. And then they tried to say, “Oh, we’re America’s team, we’re America’s game, we’re America’s sport,” while allowing their employees to disrespect this country. You have the right to do it — there’s consequences. The NFL boycott is real —

ALISYN CAMEROTA: Listen, I just want to be very clear. They say they’re not disrespecting the country. They say that their protest is about the treatment —

FERGUSON: Well, that’s what they say.

CAMEROTA: They’re the sources. They’re doing the protesting. They’re the protesters.

FERGUSON: I have the right to disagree with them. I’ll say this. I think many of the NFL players are frauds. Most of them did not go and vote in the last election, including Colin Kaepernick who’s never voted in an election — while coming out and claiming —

ANA NAVARRO, CNN POLITICAL COMMENTATOR: Voting is not a requirement to protest. Voting is not a requirement to voice a political opinion.

FERGUSON: If you’re going to be the leader of a political statement, as Colin Kaepernick was —

NAVARRO: Donald Trump’s children didn’t vote, and they are advisors in the White House!

FERGUSON: And I criticized — and I criticized them for that. I’m consistent.

NAVARRO: Well, fine, you criticize them for everything, but don’t tell me, then, that they don’t have a right to protest when the senior advisors in the White House didn’t vote.

FERGUSON: Colin Kaepernick comes out and says, “I’m going to lead this group.” When was the last time he went to a Black Lives Matter — the guy saw a bunch of TVs and a bunch of cameras and said, “I’m going to kneel right now, but I’m not going to back it up.”

CAMEROTA: That’s his right.

FERGUSON: He has a right, but it also means you’re a fraud.

NAVARRO: Can I tell you something, Ben? Ben, how white of you to think that going to a Black Lives Matter rally —

FERGUSON: It’s not white — don’t even go there. Don’t even — I’m sorry — that’s absurd.

NAVARRO: No, no, who are you to tell a black person what makes them black — what makes them have black credible?

FERGUSON: Again, it has nothing to do with race.

NAVARRO: Look at yourself in the mirror. What he is saying might be more significant than what — than going to one of the rallies.

FERGUSON: If I go out there every day and I champion a cause and I never do it in real life, I’m a fraud.

NAVARRO: Who died and made you the judge of blackness — to tell Colin what’s’-his-name that the fact he voted or not allows him to have a political opinion?

FERGUSON: If you go out there every day and you fight for something that you say is so near and dear to your heart, and then I find out in reality you’re never involved in the issue other than being on national TV, you’re a fraud. You’re a fraud and a fake.

NAVARRO: Well, then talk to Ivanka Trump! Talk to Ivanka Trump who didn’t vote!

FERGUSON: Again, we’re talking about Colin Kaepernick.

NAVARRO: No, no, because you want to hold this one standard for this one set of people and another one for another set of people.

FERGUSON: I did. I said this. I said this. You should have voted in an election.

NAVARRO: Ivanka Trump and Donald Trump Jr. are frauds because they didn’t vote in the Republican primaries!

FERGUSON: They should have voted in elections. I said that. You also voted for Hillary Clinton, and you say you’re a Republican, so that’s a little bit of a fraud, isn’t it?

NAVARRO: No, no, no, there’s a lot of Republicans who did.

FERGUSON: By using your standard. You come on here and say you’re a Republican. You say you’re a Republican, and you voted for Hillary Clinton. So you’re not a Republican, by your standard.

NAVARRO: You voted for a man who was a Democrat and then an independent, and then when he was an opportunist, he became a Republican. So, really, don’t go there for me because I have been supporting Republican candidates for President probably when you were still in diapers!

FERGUSON: Again, you voted for Hillary Clinton, and you say you’re a Republican.

NAVARRO: I voted for Hillary Clinton because I refuse to vote for a racist, misogynist, even though he was a Republican nominee.

FERGUSON: And you have every right to do that.

NAVARRO: And it was the first time in my life that I did not support the Republican nominee because I found him absolutely disgusting, and I was going to put country over party! And you are nobody to question Colin Kaepernick what’s-his-name’s blackness or my Republican credentials, okay? You are not judge and or jury! You can do whatever you want for yourself — you cannot judge me — you cannot judge whether he is black enough!

FERGUSON: I can judge Colin Kaepernick. It doesn’t have anything to do with his blackness. This the weakest argument — let me finish, though —

NAVARRO: Oh, you’re saying — you’re saying he’s not black enough because he didn’t go to Black Lives Matter.

FERGUSON: Again, I’m going to finish my point here because it’s really important.

NAVARRO: And you are black because you went to a Black Lives Matter rally!

FERGUSON: Let me finish – let me finish — again, let me finish. Colin Kaepernick coming out and saying this is a big issue to him, but he never goes out into the community and is involved in it — doesn’t even care enough about the issue which he says everyone else should care about to go register to vote and vote. That is hypocrisy — it has nothing to do with being black or white. It’s called being a hypocrite.


Still with me, or did your head explode?

The first really stupid comment comes from Camerota. The protesters are emulating, and say they are emulating, Colin Kaepernick, who said when he was making his incoherent protest,

“I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color…”

Thus they ARE showing disrespect, and it was CNN’s anchor’s job, as moderator, to illuminate that fact for viewers, or explain why protesters appearing to do something aren’t doing what they are doing. But CNN moderators believe their job is to contradict conservatives.

Ferguson, however, immediately takes the discussion down the stupid hole, arguing that whether or not an individual should protest depends on whether they voted. Navarro is equal to the task of topping him, however, with her “Well, fine, you criticize them for everything, but don’t tell me, then, that they don’t have a right to protest when the senior advisors in the White House didn’t vote.” Huh? A. He didn’t say they didn’t have a “right.” B. If they have a right, it isn’t more or less of a right because Ivanka Trump didn’t vote…in the REPUBLICAN PRIMARIES. This is Ann, though. She reasons in rationalizations and non-sequiturs.

Then the moderator goes two for two in factually false statements. no, Alisyn, you hack, he does NOT have a right to kneel on the field. Nobody has a right to protest in their workplace, while on the job. If you were a competent journalist, you would explain that to your viewers too. But that would require you to understand it.

Next, Ana, who is on national TV to analyze the issues in an NFL controversy launched more than a year ago by Colin Kaepernick, calls him “what’s his name.” Nice. Great preparation, there, Ms. Navarro. You are paid to do this, and that’s the best you can do?

CNN pollutes the culture and political discourse by foisting garbage like this on the public as “news,” “commentary,” “analysis,” or anything but incompetence personified. How can they justify paying fools like Ferguson and Navarro, or employing flaccid hacks like Camerota? How can CNN’s reporters be indignant when they are insulted by the White House, when this is the abysmal level of broadcast news that they present to America?

These are the frauds: fake pundits and journalists like Ferguson, Navarro and Camerota. They present themselves as professions, yet have no skills, integrity, or standards.

This is why Americans don’t trust  journalists. It’s for the exact same reason they wouldn’t trust a restaurant that kept serving crap. This is why they elected an inarticulate, stream-of-semi-consciousness boob as President: that is the level of incoherent, impulsive drivel that they are given by the news networks, and told that it qualifies as meaningful. This is why political discussions on Facebook usually end up reading like a grade school playground argument.

The news media is betraying all of us, and making us dumber, more crude and less informed in the process.

20 thoughts on “THIS Is CNN. How Embarrassing…For You, Me, Ted Turner, James Madison, Gutenberg, Australopithecus, Everyone

  1. I think I understand what Mr. Ferguson was trying to say. I don’t think he was saying that if you don’t vote, it doesn’t matter what you say. He was pointing out how Colin was supposedely being an advocate for change, yet he didn’t appear to engage in any meaningful activity to promote change, the most basic of which would be to vote for a candidate/party that would help bring the change, thus essentially rendering his protest as grandstanding on TV. But other than this point, yikes, what a word salad. This Navarro lady shouldn’t be allowed to announce buses at the bus station, as she will probably start blathering about the inherent racism in the public transportation system or other such malarkey.

    • Ferguson would be on more sound ground if what CK was protesting was a matter of policy, rather than just the apparently unavoidable reality, unrelated to politics, that cops wrongly shoot suspects sometimes, too many suspects are black, and juries are sympathetic to police when they screw up. All of the shootings that set off the protest happened while Obama was President and his Justice Department was going out of its way to paint police as murderers. Voting is irrelevant.

      • Jack, agreed. The premise is invalid, as you pointed it out. To joke a little, perhaps CK should have made a promise to move to Canada, to a more “just” society, and not deal with the racism. The pay might be less, but it would be worth it.

        • I’m in “more just” Canida right now for work. It’s been a decade; my grandparents lived near the border and we used to visit all the time and since they passed I’ve not been here. I can’t believe how liberal this place has become. As a libertarian, I like some of it but what we have here is the results of what you get when the SJW’s win.

          • Matthew B, that’s why it’s funny. It’s not necessarily more just, it’s just more Euro style big nanny state, so the intellectuals are happy. And if you’re not happy about it, it’s illegal to say so. I satirize of course. Can you confirm or dispel my suspicion, that Canada is what an independent California would look like?

      • In a strict sense you are correct, it is unavoidable. You will always have accidental police shootings no matter what. But I do think things can be moved to reduce the numbers based on the training officers are given. Obama never accomplished anything on the topic because his whole administration was so glaringly incompetent. All Obama and Holder accomplished was making noise and muddling in individual events instead of addressing any of the policies. His adoring fans would never admit that, so they are left with only frustration.

        All I would ask adoring fans of Obama: are race relations better or worse after his 8 years?

        • To them, race relations are better because of all these “conversations” (one-sided, though they may be) that they claim are happening.

          Like many issues, most notably gun control, the conversation would be better if the hyperbole would shut down. I think that most Americans would agree, under normal circumstances, that police officers should be highly trained and work hard to avoid accidental or unnecessary shootings.

          That’s hard to discuss when one segment of the population is trying hard to paint every police shooting as the result of malicious profiling of minorities. I constantly hear Trayvon Martin’s name included in the names of police shooting victims despite the unavoidable fact that he was not shot by a police officer.

          This disingenuous lumping of dead blacks, regardless of the very different circumstances of their demises, to try to prove a pattern of systemic racism is alienating Americans who might otherwise agree that there needs to be better training, especially when the rhetoric has become so violent that police officers are now being targeted.

          So just as many Americans are reluctant to agree upon reasonable gun control measures when the media is doing its best to lump any gun death of more than one person as a mass shooting, force through legislation that does little or nothing to reduce the likelihood of criminals getting their hands on guns and promotes impossible outcomes (such as “Not one more dead child”) that can only happen if all the guns are confiscated, they are going to dig in their heels on police training so long as the narrative continues to be that all white people are inherently racist.

  2. This stresses to me how terrible it is that the schools I attended growing up did not and still do not even offer as an elective courses like rhetoric and logic, items that were once considered essential to an education.

    It seems these commentators suffered from the same lack.

  3. What is on display here is the passion of the leftist mind. Also on display is its characteristic attitude toward non-Leftists which is outrage. Leftists see anger as meritorious, as a sign of moral authenticity. It always divides the world into oppressor and oppressed. On any public policy question the leftist’s only concern is to identify which party is at fault and which has been oppressed. Leftist also believe that certain classes of people may not be legitimately criticized at all (that is clearly on display in this conversation). Criticism is itself a form of oppression when the target belongs to an oppressed class, and it is liberating when directed at oppressors. In neither case does the truth or fairness of the criticism matter to the leftist mind.

  4. The human race is moving backwards, that’s the fact. It’s not just politics: it’s the inability to think. It’s the lazy mind (or the lack of one). It’s a total dearth of concern for truth, history, rationality — or the ability to even define those terms. If the “best” we can do is have total morons as our news ‘analysts’ and/or Hillary/Trump as the ‘best’ candidates for the most powerful position in the world, we deserve to descend back to the Dark Ages. We are perilously close now. And these guys are reproducing? Kiss the gene pool goodbye, and be ready for some tyrant — who through some kind of mutation is actually able to think — to decide that IQ 80s can’t really govern themselves. Then kiss the good ol’ USA goodbye. The previous blog about West Point is a case in point, and one of the scariest things I’ve read in a long while. Morons in the Executive, in Congress, analyzing the news, but also uneducated, narcissistic, unpatriotic men and women becoming the leaders of our military? I feel so sorry for what my son will be facing…

    • I have grandchildren and great-grandchildren who are going to have to deal with the blow-back from this crap. I really feel sorry for them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.