Comment Of The Day: “Saturday Ethics Warm-Up, 9/7/2019: Trump’s Obsession, Joe’s Hands, And University Ethics Stumbles” [Item #3]

To refresh memories, #3 in this ethics warm-up of a week ago involved this email, sent to the University of Wisconsin campus yesterday by administrators.

To our campus community, Friday morning, what was intended as a protest to inspire action on environmental climate change had a very different and negative impact on many who witnessed it. Two students displayed nooses tied around their necks outside the Humanities Building.

The students involved have since apologized for their actions and committed to rectifying the impact they caused. We commend the university staff and members of our campus community who immediately intervened with the protesters and helped them understand the impact they were having. The protesters then removed the nooses.

The fact remains that members of our community were harmed. While the First Amendment guarantees the right to free expression, our community best succeeds when we express our views and promote a campus climate that is welcoming and safe to everyone.

We hope this experience can serve as a learning opportunity. Regardless of whether the display of a hateful symbol is based on a lack of cultural understanding or an expressed intent to promote fear, the lingering legacies of what these symbols represent create visceral and painful reactions among many. That harm is especially acute for people of color, for whom this history is very real.

Let’s be clear: ignorance is not an excuse. We can and must do better. For those of us who are members of majority communities, our campus offers many resources through Student Affairs and the Division of Diversity, Equity and Educational Achievement to learn about racism and injustice and about how to be strong allies.

And for those who are impacted by incidents like this, we want you to know that we support you and have resources to help….

I wrote, “The school would not make a similar statement if American flags were burned  or an effigy of President Trump were set on fire, and those gestures are no less offensive to many than the symbolic use of a noose. Nor was anyone “harmed” by the student protesters. Opinions, symbols and gestures do not harm healthy, normal people. Forcing the students to apologize was wrong and a direct affront to their right of expression.”

Mrs. Q then picked up the baton. Here is her Comment of the Day on that issue:

3. According to the WSJ They said they modeled their protest after one in Europe that involved people in nooses standing on blocks of melting ice.

These protesters had no racist intentand emulated a European protest strategy. While I think it’s a stupid way to make a statement whether from Europe or the United States, the point had nothing to do with denigrating blacks and should have been taken as such by reasonable people. Pulling those students aside to explain a potential misinterpretation would have been enough.

However, the anointed staff at the college appears to be unable to pass on a juicy opportunity to virtue signal while pandering, exploiting, and infantilizing their students of color. Let me offer a Wokeness decoder for what the UW of Madison was really saying.

  • “That harm is especially acute for people of color, for whom this history is very real.”

“We privileged and progressive whites know blacks are a monolith who can’t discern context or utilize reason in such matters because victim…victim…victim.”

  • And for those who are impacted by incidents like this, we want you to know that we support you and have resources to help.

“We have the power to help you because you can’t help or think for yourselves.”

  • For those of us who are members of majority communities, our campus offers many resources through Student Affairs…

“Whites! You better conform to the white privilege theory ( which a privileged white woman conjured) and join our ranks as representatives on the mission to make people of color feel increasingly in need of our radiant vision.”

The school’s issued statement not only chills free speech but is ultimately a test about taking a “moral stand.” As Thomas Sowell explains in his essay “The Tyranny of Visions,” anointed visionaries tend to define problems like these psychologically, which may be why the statement notes “ignorance is not an excuse.”

Instead, a kind of therapeutic “discussion session” is offered by staff from the Dean of Students Office and University Housing,  whom I’m sure are all trained in Woke Speak and can offer word salad euphoria to balm these poor students’ emotionally shattered souls.

Many years ago I used to hang out with my friend Becky at UW of Madison drinking contraband Hamm’s beers while playing darts. I miss those days and am glad we didn’t have to deal with such grandstanding.

5 thoughts on “Comment Of The Day: “Saturday Ethics Warm-Up, 9/7/2019: Trump’s Obsession, Joe’s Hands, And University Ethics Stumbles” [Item #3]

  1. Incisive, as in the incisors are active (and appropriate) in this comment. But, how do we get these administrators to see their approach is diametrically opposed to what they say they stand for. Coddling is going to produce graduates who can “adapt to new situations” and “engage as world citizens”?

    • Johnny I tried many times to talk to teachers and administrators when I went to college in Portland. In particular I had a professor threaten my grade because I challenged respectfully that their “correct” answer on a family studies test regarding how lesbians have sex was atypical at best.

      I feel bad for these students because they’re not encouraged to think critically, especially regarding what is put forth in curriculum & culture at school. Is it any wonder I left school with only 2 terms to go? Just couldn’t take one more day of being told how oppressed someone like me is.

  2. Mrs. Q is absolutely correct. I didn’t realize she was fluent in WokeSpeak. The Woke must not be poked. Nope.

    On the other hand, there is this little nugget from New Jersey, a story about a city council trying to lowball a settlement with some litigant. The city council decided to wait them out. Apparently, there was discussion about “Jewing them down”, referencing the delay tactics to get the plaintiff to accept a lower offer. Oddly, there is no reference to the party affiliation of the persons involved, though because persons of color uttered the expression, it was simply a verbal shorthand for the litigation strategy. Here is the link:

    https://newjerseyglobe.com/local/trenton-councilwoman-calls-jew-down-a-verb-says-it-referred-to-negotiating-and-not-hate/?fbclid=IwAR1VxScJfVe06FM3EvkMZ0RAMjXXJaS3kAAeB6sJWoyBAonRCUyEZtEyPVQ

    jvb

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.