From The “Nah, There’s No Mainstream Media Bias!” Files…White Male Conservative Smirk Bad, Black Female Democrat Smirk Good!

The definition of a “smirk”, I see as I peruse several dictionary definitions, is a condescending, smug, conceited or silly smile, universally regarded as obnoxious, rude and annoying. Thus the expression caught in an instant on the face of a teenage Catholic school student as a Native American activist intentionally confronted him, blocked his way and banged his drum within inches of his face was deemed by multiple commentators and pundits from progressive news organizations—that is to say, news organizations—to make the kid’s face “punchable.”

Examination of the video revealed that Nick Sandmann was not, in fact, smirking at all, but smiling awkwardly because human beings don’t have appropriate expressions pre-programmed for “old Indian jerk starts chanting and beating a drum in your face without any discernible reason when you have no clear avenue of escape.”

Senator Harris’s smirking, in contrast, has no excuse whatsoever, except that she is instinctively arrogant and condescending. And what does Kamala Harris have to be condescending about?

Yet here is a Washington Post headline proclaiming that a rude and anti-social habit universally regarded as showing disrespect for others is a “super-power” because Harris is a black woman. The pundit responsible for this rationalization for what no white male could get away with is Michelle Norris, a Post opinion contributor among what the late, great Mad Magazine would have called ‘the usual gang of idiots.” She writes, in part,

Black women have elevated the “Mama don’t take no mess” expression to a form of high art — a narrowing of the eye, a lift of the eyebrow, a tilt of the head. Sometimes there is a sideways arch of the neck, a molasses-slow movement of the jaw that says, without speaking, “You’ve got exactly 10 seconds to pick up your feet and run for the hills.”…The kind of thing that leads Black women to be called sassy, volatile, aggressive or angry. All of that is an effort to dismiss or demean. But that attempted erasure is the very reason Black women — indeed, most women — have some version of The Look in their arsenal….Women have long had to adorn their actual language with body language to be heard. Sometimes it is through protest, but often it is much more subtle than that. Lowering or adjusting the pitch of one’s voice. Fixing one’s gaze. A posture that says “I mean business” when the world isn’t interested in allowing you to run a business.

Nice try, Michelle. Except:

  • People don’t “listen” to teenagers either. Why is a white teen’s perceived smirk judged offensive and make his face “punchable,” while a black Vice-Presidential candidate’s “smirk” is judged justified, other than through the wielding of a transparent double standard?
  • Kamala Harris’s problem isn’t that men won’t listen to her, it’s that they hear what she has to say, and it is so frequently shallow and unpersuasive.
  • An obnoxious facial expression that communicates contempt and superiority doesn’t encourage others to raise their regard for the smirker, or be more inclined to take their words seriously. Indeed, Occam’s Razor would suggest that a habitual smirk is one of the reasons people aren’t interested in having someone, female or not, black or not, in a leadership position.
  • Women are listened to and taken seriously when they make intelligent and perceptive statements. Intelligent and perceptive statements are not enhanced, nor will be more likely to be appreciated when the speaker, male, female, black or white, delivers it with offensive expressions or gestures.

If Harris’s conceited facial tics are really are a common black woman’s technique, it is an impediment to their success, not an asset. The Post’s unconvincing spin is another striking example of Rationalization #64, “It isn’t What It Is,” the official mainstream media rationalization of the 2020 election campaign.

Like so many other examples where blacks, in particular, are undermined by being held to less demanding standards of conduct, encouraging black women to smirk does them no favors.

9 thoughts on “From The “Nah, There’s No Mainstream Media Bias!” Files…White Male Conservative Smirk Bad, Black Female Democrat Smirk Good!

  1. “Black women have elevated the “Mama don’t take no mess” expression to a form of high art —”

    That statement suggests they are responsible for the behaviors of their children. Think about that.

    • Careful, Chris. You are getting perilously close to suggesting that we judge people by the content of their character, not the color of their skin (or gender, or quality of their smirk).

  2. I don’t think would helped her in her recent debate with Mike Pence. When you’re caught saying something that just ain’t so, it makes you look foolish and unlikable. Groans and eye rolls have the same effect. Just ask Al Gore.

  3. “If Harris’s conceited facial tics are really a common black woman’s technique, it is an impediment to their success, not an asset.”

    Boy, I wish I could have mustered that well-reasoned and stated a response when I read that article. I was apoplectic. Seventy-one percent of black kids are born without a father around? How’s that black woman’s technique working for you, girls? Why do black jocks and celebs marry white women? How is it Tyler Perry’s made a fortune mocking black women’s “techniques?”

    This opinion piece is sheer idiocy in the vein of “You go girl!” Thanks for posting on it.

  4. Was recently reminded by a high school classmate of my affinity for the following non-PC snippet from a Kipling poem while living in Asia several decades ago:

    Now it is not good for the Christian’s health to hustle the Aryan brown,
    For the Christian riles, and the Aryan smiles and he weareth the Christian down;
    And the end of the fight is a tombstone white with the name of the late deceased,
    And the epitaph drear: “A Fool lies here who tried to hustle the East.”
    (https://www.poetryloverspage.com/poets/kipling/naulahka.html)

    Upon re-reading the poem, I discovered that the subsequent section was not only a perfect description of much of today’s so-called reporting (as discussed in your post), but that it also could be transformed into a wonderful G&S-esque patter song with very little effort:

    There is pleasure in the wet, wet clay
    When the artist’s hand is potting it.
    There is pleasure in the wet, wet lay —
    When the poet’s pad is blotting it.
    There is pleasure in the shine of your picture on the line
    At the Royal Acade-my;
    But the pleasure felt in these is as chalk to Cheddar cheese
    When it comes to a well-made Lie–

    To a quite unwreckable Lie,
    To a most impeccable Lie!
    To a water-right, fire-proof, angle-iron, sunk-hinge, time-lock, steel-faced Lie!
    Not a private handsome Lie,
    But a pair-and-brougham Lie,
    Not a little-place-at-Tooting, but a country-house-with-shooting
    And a ring-fence-deer-park Lie.

  5. Once again the media left is treating a designated racial group as a monolith. Last I checked, that’s considered racist. And since Harris has white slave owners in her background, perhaps that smug face was her white supremacy coming though.

    Once again there is the assumption that the surface is a proper replacement for the substantial. In this scenario a facial expression substitutes for actions. You’d have to have a pretty low opinion of black women’s capacities to reduce their power to smirks and making the “bitch face.”

    A black woman’s “super-power” is in her actions, not her facial expressions. Standing up to the racism of low expectations and subservience the radial left demands of black women is a part of their real power.

    For Harris, not hitching your wagon to a guy who equates blacks with the poor or predators or grocery shelf stockers or having to vote a certain way because of their skin tone, would be a “super-power.” Sadly for Harris, she is incredibly weak on this and her smirk does nothing except reinforce idea that power at any cost (even to the detriment of blacks) is acceptable.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.