Ethics Dunce: University of Illinois Chicago John Marshall Law School


You knew I couldn’t let this one pass.

The UIC John Marshall Law School is officially changing its name to the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law. The decision, a capitulation to the unethical mentality of the cancel culture and historical air-brushing strategy embraced by the political Left, comes after months of review by a task force. The resulting report noted, “that despite Chief Justice Marshall’s legacy as one of the nation’s most significant U.S. Supreme Court justices, the newly discovered research regarding his role as a slave trader, slave owner of hundreds of slaves, pro-slavery jurisprudence, and racist views render him a highly inappropriate namesake for the Law School.”

The most influential and important jurist in U.S, history is a highly inappropriate namesake for a law school. Got it.

John Marshall was the fourth chief justice of the Supreme Court, (1801 – 1835), and the only essential one. He authored the majority opinion in Marbury v. Madison (1803) that established judicial review, giving the Court power to declare legislative acts and executive actions unconstitutional. Without Marshall, the Constitution wouldn’t work. He took a bold and controversial step to ensure that basic rights and principles would not be wiped out by a rogue Congress or a dictatorial President. How many landmark SCOTUS decisions does the nation owe to Marshall as a result? How different would our lives be without his deft adjustment to the balance of the Branches? Would the United States of America even exist at all?

Never mind. Marshall was a racist, you see, and a slaveholder. Virtually every white man in the United States and Europe was a racist in the early 19th Century. The hindsight bias of condemning Marshall for beliefs that were the norm and practices that were legal and accepted by his culture is presentism at its worst.

“The university has arrived at this new name following a thorough and carefully studied process that included input from all corners of the institution and beyond, considered issues of racial injustice and aimed to ensure that our university continues to be a place where diversity, inclusion and equal opportunity are supported and advanced,” said UIC Chancellor Michael Amiridis.

This is pandering, virtue-signaling nonsense. The reasons for John Marshall’s significance, fame and honor have nothing to do with racial justice, except to the extent that his jurisprudence made it possible. The reasoning used by the University would similarly require wiping Washington, Jefferson, Madison, Jackson and other essential founders from their proper place as the architects of this country. (It would also require cancelling sexual abuser Martin Luther King.)

Cleveland-Marshall College of Law is also considering cancelling John Marshall. And I’m thinking about changing my name to Ferdinand Slipsnuffle.

Law professor Josh Blackman writes in John Marshall Law School Cancels John Marshall: “John Marshall has officially been canceled. The greatest jurist in American history has been summarily excommunicated. Inclusion demands exclusion. These purges will not stop with slavery. None of us are safe.”

I concur.

4 thoughts on “Ethics Dunce: University of Illinois Chicago John Marshall Law School

  1. I would ask if the cancellers are aware of the likelihood of Roe v Wade existing had there been no judicial review, but we are dealing with historically-ignorant, ungrateful ideologues who have marked slavery as the top of the Evil Pyramid which defines a person’s entire life, negating any other positive contributions to the country at all.

    And they will never cancel Dr. King. They may no longer care as much about his message, but he is theirs to control and manipulate to suit their purpose, as well as the honoree of a free holiday.

    • You know what bothers me about MLK’s legacy? The fact that his children are alive today, and as far as I know, haven’t said a word about just how far off the rails his actual message has gotten. True, he wasn’t a saint, but he did so much to correct so many ACTUAL injustices. I doubt he’d have a minute’s patience with any of this sniveling, blame-deflecting, victimhood-worshipping bullshit that only serves to disempower his community. I’m sure he’s rolling in his grave.

  2. “The reasoning used by the University would similarly require wiping Washington, Jefferson, Madison, Jackson and other essential founders from their proper place as the architects of this country. (It would also require cancelling sexual abuser Martin Luther King.) ”

    Half right, at least according to the left. The first part, yes indeed, but the second part, nope. We’ve seen this movie a few times over the past five years, and we know how it ends. It just got a turbo boost last year with the death of George Floyd. But don’t worry, they say, you’ll still be able to read about these folks in the history books…in proper context, of course. At least you’ll still be until they rewrite the books.

    You can buy novelty tees for almost anything or any cause these days, I buy them mostly for fighter squadrons. I think this design says where these folks want history to go.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.