What else is there to say?
A Facebook Communist friend posted that, and I know he believes it. What kind of indoctrination, propaganda, and unethical social bubble makes an intelligent man think that bigoted analysis is true, fair, reasonable or responsible?
And I guarantee that no one will criticize or argue with that asinine post.
Ethics Alarms 
Here are a couple more absurd statements off of Nextdoor that are destined to be memes or maybe they already are…
People writing these kinds of things are morons.
Been in a multi-day conversation with some progressively minded Democrats on Nextdoor regarding protesting the ICE shooting in Minneapolis, it’s been “interesting”. Paul Schlecht has been witnessing it.
If anyone that has an account on Nextdoor is interested in this particular Nextdoor conversation, it was started by Paul Gruenbacher and I think the link below should take you to his profile page where you can find the following post. At the time of this posting, it has 105 comments.
Yes I am. The “protest” is a mere .8 miles/1.3 kms from my house
IMO, Steve is using remarkable restraint in his dealings with these imbeciles.
Until recently, neighborsnextdoor (THEY Report/YOU Decide!) has been a fetid cesspool of monocultured Lefty slobbering; no surprise to anyone familiar with the 77 Square Miles Surrounded By A Sea Of Reality.
It’s comforting to see there’s now at least some pushback against the preponderance of ill/uniformed Lefty blather, and much of that has been (in this thread, leastways) Steve’s dispassionately deft dismantling of their comically absurd certainty.
PWS
That woman thought she could run down federal officers with impunity.
She was taught police only shoot innocent black men.
She was taught that immigrants, regardless of legal residency status, were being disappeared without due process.
She was taught leadership she hadn’t voted for is illegitimate because it was installed by a violent dictator on the other side of the world, and she’s convinced bankruptcies, two impeachments and dozens of felonies prove it.
A drove up to an Indivisible organized sign waiving, side of the road, honking inducing demonstration and talked to a bunch of them. I was told about citizens being picked up off the street and held incommunicado for weeks and even months. Where did this come from?
“Where did this come from?”
From their handlers; easier’n strippin’ bark from a spring log!
PWS
Dumber than the following meme? Analogies still do have to work in memes!
Shame on Nick Kristof. He used to be smarter than that.
Res Ipsa Loquitur. What is Tom Morello from Rage in the Machine thinking? The population of Iran is anti-mullah. Or is Tom Morello pro-mullah?
These sorts of assertions remond me of a sort of frenzy.
There’s this account of the prophet Elijah and the prophets of Baal. In his interaction with them, they chant and get no response from Baal and their chanting escalates to self mutilation and still no response.
This is a people who’s sense of real and right has become dislocated reality – the result of insulin resistance in the brain,and dopamine disregulation due to instant everhthing.
This meme is a perfect example why I think everyone should learn the Rules of Evidence.
Two sentences, neither of which would be admissible in a court of law. Both statements, based upon the current evidence we have, are speculative and without foundation (I admit that that is redundant, but, in case you didn’t, I wanted to get the point across). Thus, neither of them would be appropriate for me to consider in forming an opinion about this case.
Yet, these sorts of statements can easily reinforce our biases. We don’t question them because they say what we already think or what we want to think.
In many ways, the Rules of Evidence instruct us better on the way to process evidence than logic does. Logic might be better for arguments but the Rules of Evidence is better for facts. But, hey some logic is better than no logic.
Back to the point, I see so many posts about his motivations and her motivations (no, I do not believe she was trying to run him over; he was just in the way of her escape path). They are practically useless and arguing against them seems futile because the proponents of such arguments don’t understand why they are stupid arguments.
-Jut
This is from 3 MONTHS ago. The superintendent of the Chicago Police Department called this as something that could happen.