I’m busy today, but fortunately I am being inundated by ethics stories that write themselves. Watch that video above. A Minneapolis dog park is being decommissioned because someone discovered it was on “sacred Native American land.” The rational response to that “problem” is “so what?” If it was sacred, the reasons are lost to antiquity. Not one living human being is harmed by supervised dogs running free in the area. Nonetheless, this uber-woke stste is besotted with victim-mongering and its culture embraces the batty “land acknowledgments” progressives are now addicted to. (One was read before the official dedication of Obama’s “The Empire Strikes Back” styled library.)
And please someone tell me: why are unleashed dogs more disrespectful to dead Indians than leashed dogs?
It continues to amaze me that so many once intelligent, reasonable people have been indoctrinated, bullied, and propagandized into such madness. But they have.
Now what?
Spuds is perplexed.
[Pointer: James Rogers]
Ethics Alarms 
I leave town for 1 week and it all goes to a deeper ring of hell.
this is a great dog park. Right by the river with many acres for dogs to roam and run. With a fenced entrance, they are not getting out. But, now, they have to be on-leash.
absolutely stupid. This is not a flat dog park in an open field. It is a hilly wooded area. Arguably the best dog park in the city (and thee are many).
and, yes, it is on sacred land. I wish they would consult the local Dakota tribes and find out which pieces of land are not sacred, or even cursed, so we can all bring our dogs over to shit on it.
of course, they would likely demure, as all land is sacred.
you would think they would much rather have a free range dog park where the Wolf-Spirit can run wild instead of a reservation-style dog park, where the Wolf-Spirit is controlled by well-meaning but misguided autocrats.
-Jut