My Recent Education Regarding The Legal Community’s Alleged “Policing the Profession”

I filed my detailed complaint in early February. Despite the website’s assurances that I would receive an immediate acknowledgement, I did not until I called two months later to complain. I was told that part of the process may have “fallen though the cracks.” I received the promised acknowledgment in a couple weeks: it was a form letter, one that assumed I was a client, which meant that no one had read my 20 page document.

On June 18th, I received notice from the Office of Disciplinary Counsel that an investigation had been opened. I was told that if I requested it, I would be sent a “secure link” where I could file supporting documents, and that July 30 was the deadline for sending them. I requested the link. It was secure all right: it didn’t work. It took me over an hour to reach someone who would acknowledge this, and agree to send a functioning “secure link.”

Meanwhile, I have been furiously trying to assemble the package of documents. But two days ago I received an official letter from the Office of Disciplinary Counsel that read in part…

“We reviewed the disciplinary complaint that you filed against [REDACTED] … You filed your complaint with our office on February 11, 2026. Thank you for your patience, as we process complaints in the order in which they are received…We sent you a letter on April 17, 2026, acknowledging receipt of your complaint. On June 18, 2026, we sent you a letter via email requesting additional information and documentation….We have not received additional information or documentation from you…At this time, we do not have sufficient information and documentation to provide a foundation for your complaint. We therefore will not docket this matter for further investigation, and our file is closed. Pursuant to Board Rule 2.4, Disciplinary Counsel’s decision not to docket a complaint is not subject to review.”

The letter was sent to me on July 28. The letter was dated July 27. The date on that June 18th letter by which I was told my supporting documents must be submitted was July 30, today. But my complaint was “undocketed” because I did not meet a deadline that hadn’t arrived yet.

I have called the Office of Disciplinary Counsel four times to get some explanation for my treatment and of how this could have occurred. Nobody could (or would) speak with me. I was so furious that I could barely function for the rest of the evening. I am not much calmer today.

The D.C. Bar is supposed to be a model for the rest of the country. The frightening thing: it probably is.

12 thoughts on “My Recent Education Regarding The Legal Community’s Alleged “Policing the Profession”

  1. “Thank you for your patience, as we process complaints in the order in which they are received…” that statement is res ips loquitor, that the legal profession is, for the most part, without ethics. They have so many complaints, there is not sufficient time to process them, they are stonewalling!

  2. Are in-person visits allowed when your documentation is not addressed in a timely manner???? I’m not in your field, but that’s the course of action I take in other matters.

  3. A third bar association in a jurisdiction where this unethical lawyer has practiced law without a license refused to receive my complaint….

    My understanding is that practicing law without a license is a criminal offense. Can a bar association discipline lawyers who do not have a license, and I presume is therefore not registered with the bar association? I am not a lawyer, I might need some education on this, and how the bar should handle the unethical conduct of a lawyer without a license, and who for all practical purposes is (as) disbarred.

    Should law enforcement / the legal system be alerted to the criminal activities of this lawyer?

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.