Octomom and PETA: a Match Made in Ethics Hell

I didn’t think anything could make me feel sorry for Octomom, a.k.a. Nadya Suleman, the serial baby-machine who is a one-woman bioethics seminar with some child exploitation thrown in for spice. Then along came People For the Ethical Treatment of Animals, the ethically-challenged animal rights fanatics. PETA believes that no person or thing on earth deserves consideration, fairness or respect if he, she or it can be used to advance its message. A few months ago, it plastered the First Lady on some of the organization’s ads without her permission, because it knew that the publicity over this obvious violation of Michelle Obama’s right to be consulted before being used this way would get PETA in the news. And it did.

When you turn off the ethics alarms that are supposed to sound before you violate a person’s dignity, autonomy and self-respect, it is amazing what schemes you can come up with. So when PETA learned that Suleman was about to lose her home  in a foreclosure, its brain trust thought, “Wow, she must be desperate. And she obviously has no shame. I bet she’ll do anything for money! It probably won’t even have to be much money, either.”

Nope. For $5,000 and a month’s supply of veggie burgers and hot dogs, Octomom agreed to let PETA compare her to household pets and her children to a litter. She will allow the group to put a sign in her front yard proclaiming, “Don’t Let Your Dog or Cat Become an Octomom! Always Spay or Neuter!”

Just because an individual of questionable judgement or in desperate straits agrees to let you humiliate them, exploit them or harm them doesn’t change the nature of the act. PETA is using the combination of Suleman’s financial plight and congenital absence of the normal shame impulse to make her and her brood their freakish billboard. They might as well have asked her to tattoo the message on her face, or exhibit herself with her kids in a giant terrarium on the front lawn from 9 to 5. This is the organization, after all, that objected to the exploitation of Punxsutawney Phil  to promote Groundhog Day, and Phil doesn’t have the slightest idea that he is being exploited. Yet it will exploit a woman and her children, objectifying them, stripping them of human dignity and subjecting them to public degradation in the name of “ethics.”

What PETA is doing is not illegal. It is merely cruel, uncaring and wrong. The organization’s conduct proves that it has no ethical bearings at all, only a fixed, relentlessly pursued mission that it will stop at nothing to achieve. When an organization’s membership slips into this kind of an ethics void, our obligation is to reject it and its message, until a responsible, ethical messenger arrives.

5 thoughts on “Octomom and PETA: a Match Made in Ethics Hell

  1. It’s my opinion (and I’m not saying that I like it, agree with it or anything) that PETA is trying to achieve total equality among things that breathe.

    If they can’t “build capital into animals” they’ll “devalue humans” until they are equal. They obviously feel it is easier to tear down than to build up.

    I’m always a fan of the proper Anagram of PETA. People Eating Tasty Animals.

  2. Um… didn’t Octomom use fertility drugs to get herself into this predicament, thus making the metaphor even less valid?

  3. These CHILDREN, 8 of them who are considered a litter often times and seemingly don’t even have names will be bullied and teased beyond what any adult could every cope with when they get older and they will read about what happened, from the time they were born and all the tabloid craziness that followed and they are the ones that will have to try and work through this and try and understand what took place during their childhood years and which they had no control over.

    I believe this sign on their lawn is not something that belongs in a family picture album.

    There are kids taking their lives because of bullying. Its in the paper more and more. Would anyone want their child to have to deal with this situation or just wait for Jon and Kate’s kids to sort through the internet that has documented their most private moments and family’s dirty laundry.

    This is all about the kids. And what about the Judge that determined Nadya Suleman could handle the family finances without any outside intervention…is this the definition of being responsible?

    The kids will thank people like Jack when they grow up and see who tried to make things better for them.

    PETA…really bad move, really bad. You don’t exploit children to send out your message. We all love animals and we love children too.

    • Thanks Janet—you know how the most of the media has reacted to this story? “It’s hilarious.” It isn’t. It’s tragic. But Octomom’s kids are treated as a punchline, just as she is.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.