Ethics Dunce: Prosecutor Kit Bramblett

Uh, Willie? The judge woul like you to put down the weed and sing.

In West Texas, Hudspeth County prosecutor has recommended an unusual set of penalties for country music legend Willie Nelson, who has been arrested for possession of marijuana as he has been many times in the past. County Attorney Kit Bramblett has recommended to the judge in the case that she allow Bramblett to drop possession charges if Nelson pleads guilty, pays a fine…

…. and sings “Blue Eyes Crying in the Rain” for in court.

His recommendation is ethically offensive on many levels, though it is probably not a violation of any Texas rule of legal ethics, for the Texas Rules of Professional Conduct does not directly address Ethics Dunces. However…

  • His recommendation holds the justice system and the court system up to ridicule. This isn’t a game of “Truth or Dare.”
  • Bramblett’s trivialization of the penalties for drug possession violates the spirit, though not the letter, of his pledge to enforce and uphold the law. He is officially undermining the legitimate state policy of condemning and criminalizing marijuana use, and that is a breach of hid duties to Texas. If the citizens of Texas don’t want laws against marijuana use, they should have their legislators change them. Bramblett’s duty is to enforce the law, not to mock it.
  • Treating a scofflaw like Nelson as a special guest of the law enforcement system reinforces the corrosive (and justified) public belief, bolstered regularly by the outrageous tolerance shown to public figures like Eliot Spitzer, Charlie Sheen and Lindsay Lohan, that there are two systems of justice—one for the rich and famous, where the most common punishment is a slap on the wrist, and another for everyone else. Nelson’s position with pot has always been that he’ll keep using, and the law be damned. A fair and serious prosecutor would throw the book at him.
  • Making Willie perform for the court like a hurdy-gurdy monkey is demeaning to his talent, and an abuse of power. The law doesn’t exist to provide a means for law enforcement officials to force command performances for their own entertainment. How does the public benefit from Willie’s making the judge and prosecutor smile and tap their toes? Indeed, as commenter Tim LeVier pointed out below, this is very similar to asking Nelson for a bribe in exchange for lenient treatment. What would Willie charge for a private performance of one song? $10,000? $50,000? Whatever the going rate is, the court will be getting that value.

Meanwhile, I don’t hold much out much hope that the judge in the case will give the prosecutor’s recommendation that quick rejection it deserves. Bramblett says the judge specifically demanded that Nelson appear in court instead of pleading by mail, a common procedure in these cases because “she wants to meet Willie.”

There’s nothing like a judge fawning over a criminal defendant to give the public faith in the justice system.

13 thoughts on “Ethics Dunce: Prosecutor Kit Bramblett

  1. It seems to me that there was probably a better way to get him to sing, like find a charity fundraiser that he could “volunteer” at provide community service by singing and raising money for the at-risk in the community.

    My alarms don’t go off because he’s being made to sing (though maybe they should) but they go off because the laws of the community are to serve the community’s interest, not the interest of individuals operating the law.

    In essence, since the singing serves no purpose in court than to entertain the judge and the prosecutor, shouldn’t it be considered a bribe? Did these people just request a bribe?

  2. Oh Texas. When will my state ever learn.

    It seems to me that in addition to abusing court authority to meet a celebrity, the DA in this case is making a poor attempt at humor. There was a case many years ago when I was living in the UK about an elderly woman arrested during a protest. The judge ordered her to find a “comfy chair” in the courtroom and stay in it for a few hours. That, in my opinion, both fell under the category of ethical AND witty. This just wreaks of abuse.

  3. If he has to do community service, why not something more worthwhile. They could order him to go to the schools and do educational talks about biodiesel and alternative fuels.

  4. Jack, totally nothing relating to ethics but an odd coincidence here. My husband, who was born and raised in Texas (Corpus Christi, so not West Texas), has recently had dealings with MRS. Kit Bramblett in Hudspeth County, to try to get some information from her husband regarding an inheritance issue and some obscure mineral rights. She is, as is Kit presumably, a typical West Texan, which he says is like bring from another planet, or at least not like any other part of the U.S. The Brambletts are in their 80s and have lived their whole lives there. Mrs. only left to spend 4 years at SMU (where all of the “beautiful” Texas ladies went to college, according to my husband), where she was a classmate of “Dandy” Don Meredith. When my husband told her to watch out for rattlesnakes, she told him that she doesn’t worry about them and that if she finds any she’ll just “kill ’em.” So, what you have related regarding Willie and Kit and Becky doesn’t surprise my husband one bit. Just to put things in perspective…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.