Cromwell and Goodwin’s new website is a mystery. Nobody knows why it exists, or who created it. It appears to be the website of a law firm, if a somewhat language-challenged one. The problem: the law firm doesn’t exist. Its history is imaginary. Its partners do not exist. Its headquarters in New York at 221 E 18th St # 1 New York, NY 10003-3620 are vacant.
The firm, or whatever it is, claims to be 30 years old but only got around to launching a website on March 19 of this year. A press release on a free publicity distribution service called PRLog.org about Cromwell & Goodwin’s involvement in an upcoming conference regarding telecommunications consolidation projects in emerging markets also surfaced, for no discernible reason. The release referred to Joachim Fleury, a London-based Clifford Chance partner, as “Global Head of Cromwell & Goodwin.” Yet neither Clifford Chance, one of the largest law firms in the world, nor Fleury, who is real, knew anything about Cromwell & Goodwin when they were queried by reporters.
The Financial Services Authority, Britain’s leading financial regulator, has issued a warning about Cromwell & Goodwin, which describes itself as a New York-based law firm. This is dubious, and not just because nobody can find its New York headquarters. The website includes several British touches, such as the spelling of “organization” with an “s” rather than a “z.” The most popular theory is that the website is being used in some kind of scam, victim or victims unknown. Meanwhile, the website itself has become the source of endless speculation and entertainment over such features as its peculiar call for resumes:
“Do you want a challenging career with exceptional compensation and benefits and can give you a lifetime professional development? You need not to go anywhere because Cromwell and Goodwin has more than something to offer you!”
This may be true, since the firm itself isn’t “anywhere.” But what the heck is “more than something”?
Then there’s the puzzle about why the website says the firm was founded 29 years ago but has been practicing law for “more than 30 years.” Why are only five lawyers named on the site, and who are the rest of the 300 attorneys the site claims are part of the firm? How come all the names are American or English sounding, but so many of the lawyers pictured on the site appear to be Asian? Why is named partner “Liberty Goodwin” described as a “she”, yet when Am Law Daily finally reached a heavily accented woman named “Sonya” on the firms phone line, she described Goodwin as male. And is “Sonya” by chance related to “Peggy,” the man pretending to be a woman in the Discover Card commercials?
Mysteries all.
One thing is certain, however. Cromwell and Goodwin, and its website, are up to no good.

Most likely part of a scam to fleece potential immigrants, possibly operated by – and on – Chinese from Hong Kong, or perhaps Singapore (notice British spellings of words like “programme” and “practice”).
Agreed. Being an online gamer, I’ve learned to recognize the hallmarks of a Chinese scam. And the most telling is certainly their atrocious usage of the English language. I have a feeling they’re not scamming anyone yet, but setting up for one. Expect them to start actively soliciting.
Also, the pic looks shopped.
Yes, Chase, it does, because it is. That’s the site’s photo of some of its “lawyers.” That was the point..
I can’t resist stating the obvious. It’s one of my known weaknesses.
FYI: Your title and several instances in the text say “Goodman” (as in King Ralph) rather than “Goodwin”.
. . . although since Cromwell and Goodman doesn’t exist, either, you’re still technically correct . . . .
–Dwayne
Fixed it. Thanks. With my luck, Cromwell and Goodman WOULD be real, and I’d get sued.
You left in a “Goodman”. Look at the bottom of the article.
Crap. I’m just going to ask them to change their name.
Are any of the lawyers at Cromwell and Goodwin graduates of Redwood College?
DINGDINGDINGDINGDING!!!!! You win! I was waiting for that!!!!
I’m interested to note that none of the models/actors who actually posed for those pix have yelped yet. You know somewhere they got a job, a buyout for a print campaign, and would be amused/horrified to know they’re now potentially ‘posing’ as part of a worldwide scam…
Was this little mystery ever solved?