When civil rights advocates point to the disparity of sentencing for non-violent African-American drug offenders and white, shameless, greedy crooks like Kathleen McGrade and her husband, Brian Collinsworth, my best course is to feign a seizure or something. I have no good explanation for them, except that judges like federal judge Liam O’Grady are a large part of the problem.
McGrade was a management analyst for the State Department who used her position and influence to fraudulently direct $53,000,000 in 43 government contacts for construction projects and security work at U.S. sites overseas to the Sterling Royale Group, whose Vice President and CEO were Collinsworth and her daughter Jennifer Herring. She did this by hiding her relationship to the company and its officers. The taxpayer-funded family bounty, meanwhile, allowed McGrade to buy a $73,000 Lexus, a half-million-dollar yacht and nearly $223,000 in jewelry.
This is all both spectacularly illegal, and outrageously unethical, and she was, in the famous words of the jury in “The Producers,” “incredibly guilty.” What, then, would you say is a proper sentence for this betrayal of the American people, cheating of competitors, and lucrative fraud? Ten years? Twenty years?
Judge O’Grady gave her two years, and her spousal partner in crime six months less. He wept, you see, while she, bless her little sociopathic soul, denied wrongdoing, saying in her pre-sentencing statement that she was in court only because she had “been told that somehow the procurements that took place were illegal,” until it was obvious to her that this wasn’t going over well with the judge. Then she said she was “very, very,sorry.” Oh, thought the judge, that’s better. She’s a good person after all.
The minimum sentence recommended by federal sentencing guidelines is almost six years, and that’s ridiculous for as egregious misconduct as this. Apparently the judge was moved by the fact that the family business actually performed the work it illegally procured through McGrade’s manipulation and deception, and all that remorse, of course. Meanwhile, McGrady, who made it clear that she sees little wrong with what she did, will be out on the streets looking for new scams to run in two years, less with good behavior, while some inner city nickle bag drug dealer continues to to rot away.
I think risking two years in jail to get millions of dollars will seem like a sensible transaction to a lot of people, just as Wall Street manipulators can easily calculate that the risk-reward ratio their art involves is a similarly good gamble. Ethical people don’t do unethical things because they are wrong; unethical people do unethical things because the potential benefits are greater than the potential risks. Sentencing logic like Judge O’Grady’s undermines the credibility of the justice system, doesn’t even protect the public, and looks just as terrible as it is.
I’m going to have that seizure now.
Graphic: Daily Mail
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2016918/State-worker-Kathleen-McGrade-gave-husband-daughter-52m-contracts.html#ixzz2moTiwCQC
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook