Incompetent Candidate For High Political Office—I Hope Of The Year, But Somehow, I Fear Not: Harley Brown

Harley BrownThe incompetence of  people like Harley Brown, a GOP candidate for Governor of Idaho, running in the primary, makes me angry and sad.

Some will protest that candidates for office have no ethical obligation to be competent. After all, running a bad campaign is its own punishment: you lose. That is not necessarily true, however, particularly in the states, but even if it is true, you can do a lot of damage while losing.

Like any other role, task, or job, running for a high elected office like governor of a state comes with responsibilities. For one thing, other people would like to run, work hard at it, and in the process, help democracy work better by giving voters a choice. Incompetent candidates like Brown not only block someone from running who might be good at it, they also give voters less choice, and sometimes, no choice at all. Those who complain about President Obama should review the pathetic campaign performance of John McCain. All these years to prepare, and he couldn’t master the skill of reading from a teleprompter without looking like he had been zapped by Dr. Strange and sounding like a Rotary Club awardee who begins his speech with “Unaccustomed as I am to public speaking…”?

There is more to resent about inept candidates, but let us focus on what makes Brown so awful. Many Idahoans were introduced to him during the recent Republican candidates debate, in which he began the night dressed like a superannuated biker, which is apparently what he is, or maybe Santa Claus in the throes of a mid-life crisis. Then he launched into what is obviously going to be his real schtick: blue collar, redneck sensibilities as imagined in the stereotyped  dreams of Bill Maher, delivered in wince-inducing bumper-sticker slogans and bad jokes that would be the low-lights of the worst stag party routine of all time.

Harley, as his website warns you, has declared war on “political correctness,” and he intends to campaign with what he egotistically calls “Harleyisms”:

“This is a unique compilation of American blue-collar attitudes, political philosophy and non-politically correct humor to both edify and entertain you.I am an opinionated grandfather trying to do what I can to help America become a better place for my grandchildren. To tell the truth, political correctness is in fact, “bondage to fear. “I am making a major political issue of FREEDOM from political correctness. I intend to walk the walk, not just talk the talk…I want to present myself as a much different “Candid Candidate” from the politically correct lawyers now dominating political circles. Perhaps then multitudes of righteous citizens ( particularly the hoards of my currently unregistered blue-collar brothers) will become politically active and help me fight for the futures of our grandchildren with tremendous passion motivated by love…I believe Harleyisms to be a splendid weapon against the vile bondage of political correctness…”

“Harleyisms,” however, really means “moldy and mostly unfunny jokes someone else made up that are only funny to bigots, fools and kids, and are certifiably embarrassing coming from anyone over the age of 12 who is claiming to be worthy of representing, leading, and looking out for the welfare of an entire state.”

Like far too many on the Right, Brown decries political correctness but doesn’t really understand the problem. It is important to be tolerant of worthless, offensive and annoying speech because to stifle it by law, force or threatened harm will inevitably undermine innovative, creative, productive and valuable speech, and thought too. People like Brown, who are incapable of useful, productive or original thought,  think beating down political correctness is just about being able to crack Polish jokes, call gay people “fags”and make comments about blacks picking cotton without some long-haired commie making a stink about it  He is the equivalent of the crude boor who celebrates his free speech by using “fuck” loudly in the CVS. Brown abuses free speech, and thus gives the lurking censors ammunition to attack it.

His intentional offensiveness is even dumber than that, however, because not approving of elected officials making jokes about “faggots,” whores and Arabs (Harley: How can you tell when an Arab reaches the age of maturity?  He takes the diaper off his ass and plops it right on his head.) has nothing to do with political correctness at all. Elected officials, especially governors, who represent an entire state, cannot be trustworthy if they appear to denigrate some groups that already feel under siege, and that the government neither cares about them nor stands ready to respond to their problems and needs. Nor can such elected officials serve as effective role models for civility, respectful discourse, and dignified public service. The way for an elected official to show disapproval of political correctness is by refusing to chill free expression and discourage dissent, unlike, say, the big city mayors who declared the owner of Chick-Fil-A persona non-grata because of his social views.  Harley Brown really thinks the way to combat political correctness is to elect a governor who thinks “A Jap will out Jew a Jew but a Chinaman will get the Jap’s socks” is clever. Or worth saying. Or coherent.

He has nothing at all to offer the public as governor, neither executive experience, nor demonstrated civic achievements, nor the sense to come out of the rain. The fact that he is so cocky without having anything to be cocky about is the ultimate proof of his incompetence. He has no idea what running a state entails, but assumes that once he gets there he’ll figure it out. For now, he thinks, it’s good enough to proclaim his dislike of big government, liberals, gun control and fags, and that should be enough. So he gets himself on TV, chows down on his temporary fame like a glutton, and in the process holds up his state, his party, and the tea party, which supports him, to ridicule, which, I have to say, they all deserve if they can’t muster better candidates than Harley Brown.

Naturally, MSNBC invites Harley to come on the air and be exposed further by Chris Matthews, and naturally, being completely unaware of his own deficiencies, he accepts. MSNBC loves to feature idiotic Republicans (they’re all like this, you see) just like Sean Hannity likes to find the most ignorant Democrat possible, ideally one who can’t utter a grammatical sentence, and let her talk about what a wonderful President Barack Obama is for 20 minutes.

Harley Brown makes me angry and sad for all these reasons, but perhaps most of all because he shatters a cherished illusion, that our representative democracy needs more regular folk, just plain citizens, running the government, just like Mr. Jefferson wanted it. Unfortunately, the average citizen is likely to be like Brown, narrow, uninformed, badly educated, opinionated with having a basis for the opinions, and hostage to ingrained biases that can’t be removed without blasting. So in addition to making his party, state, political philosophy, race, religion, gender, and species look bad, Harley also makes our form of government look ridiculous.

There’s one more thing unethical about being an incompetent running for high office.

Sometimes you win.

Now, Heeeeeeeeere’s Harley!

______________________________

Sources: Washington Post, Mediaite 1, 2

 

10 thoughts on “Incompetent Candidate For High Political Office—I Hope Of The Year, But Somehow, I Fear Not: Harley Brown

  1. Incompetent candidates like Brown not only block someone from running who might be good at it, they also give voters less choice, and sometimes, no choice at all.

    It doesn’t apply here, but in certain specialised circumstances, which nonetheless do happen from time to time, the whole point of running is to do that kind of blocking. That is, a deliberately or fortuitously rigged system can arise, in which if you vote the winners claim to have your sanction and if you don’t they claim you forfeited any grounds to complain. After Union and Catholic Emancipation the Irish soon realised that this was happening to their representation at Westminster, so they embarked on a strategy of “join and sabotage” within the system while setting up alternatives outside it. Just a few decades ago, a long time Ulster Irish Nationalist M.P. who had never come to Westminster finally did so to avoid being barred or similar, only he promptly left after complying with the formalities. When asked why he had come at all, he replied, “I came to abstain in person”.

    He has no idea what running a state entails, but assumes that once he gets there he’ll figure it out.

    Whenever that is not the case, the system is badly designed and/or implemented. That is, if it doesn’t function with someone like that in charge (say, by providing support structures and other elected persons), then it cannot cope with a valid outcome of the electoral process.

  2. The guy sounds like the Jesse Ventura of Idaho except probably dumber. I really don’t think I’d vote for a leader of a local biker gang if I was a resident of the state.

  3. Frankly, I found him refreshing… if also incapable of running a state government. I am so damn tired of smooth-talking liars getting elected on that basis, and for whom political correctness is the basis for creating new biases, prejudices, and hate. We have elected enough highly-educated, lying, unethical SOBs to the highest offices in the states and in the country. This guy should not win, and won’t, because his “moron quotient” is too high, but give me more plain-speaking people, people who have done something other than run for office, win, and stay in government for their entire careers. Not this guy, but he’s an example of why we need people other than professional politicians to run and win and “take charge” of our country. Professional politicians have gotten us into the mess we’re in — just as “professional educators” are ruining our school systems.

    So Harley isn’t it, but the Founders looked to respected, thoughtful, smart individuals, from varying walks of life, to “do their duty” as elected officials and then get out and back to their lives. No one can convince me that an Ivy-League degree, a stint in some community organizing group, a Senatorial seat won basically by default, and a smooth talker (with a teleprompter) surrounded by sycophants was what they had in mind. Or that elected office would become a profession in and of itself.

    • Frankly, I found him refreshing… Ugh. His quotes as listed above were utterly cringeworthy. At the very least.

      • I wasn’t talking about his “quotes” — “cringeworthy” is not a bad descriptor — but I WAS talking about what his “opposites” have done to this country, and are still doing to it. He was “refreshing” only insofar as he was so completely different from the oh-so-smooth liars and crooks that have been running this country (into the ground, I might add) for decades. You might have read beyond my first sentence and into the second paragraph, where I attempt to express the historic context for my comment, and my total contempt for professional politicians, and why we need a change. So “UGH” to you too, sweetie, for snicking one word out of my total comment for the apparent sole purpose of using your new word “cringeworthy” (did you make it up? Think I’ll look it up).

        • I guess I don’t agree there is anything at all “refreshing” about a garden-variety bigot. This country has tons of them, so he’s not so different at all. At any rate, what that has to do with a history of “liars and crooks running this country into the ground” I don’t know, but I don’t see why one needs to get anywhere beyond his own statements to feel acute distaste and embarrassment (that’s the definition of “cringeworthy,” if you did indeed trouble yourself to look it up) for someone who espouses that sort of stance. Sweetie.

  4. I think I like State Senator Russ Fulcher best of those in the debate. Ot the four candidates, he seems like the smartest. C. L. “Butch” Otter seems a little too slick for me. As far as Harley Brown, he should buy himself a new bike and drop out of the race.

  5. It is possible to hear Harley Brown and respond without finding him either “refreshing” or “cringeworthy.”

    To most on the left like Chris Matthews, Brown exemplifies “how far we have yet to go, despite how far we’ve come,” which is fair enough for anyone hoping for change in any direction.

    To most on the right like me (Uh-oh! I’m really out of the closet now! But only because I am most assuredly NOT on the left of today), Brown is an entertaining, irrepressible simpleton – irrepressible, because he feeds the stereotypes which extremists on both the left and right cling to, like the U.S. Criminal-In-Chief thinks some fools do with guns and religion (like that so-called church in Chicago he sat in for over 20 years – remember? – “…the U.S. of K.K.K. A.?”).

    I am through with cringing, which is “flight,” and I am all about “fight” now. I suspect that is where Elizabeth, who is spot-on about professional politicians, is coming from. Harley Brown is to “pro” politicians today much like who Mort Sahl was to “good” comedy, in an earlier, repressed era.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.