Nothing quite warms the cockles of an ethicist’s heart like a public figure stating the truth against his or her own perceived interests. That’s ethics. Add to that when such a statement is likely to enrage an especially vicious and ruthless activist mob, and the result is a clear Ethics Hero: ethics perception plus integrity and courage.

Australian professional golfer Mianne Bagger, the first transgender athlete to compete in a professional golf tournament Down Under, told news.com.au. that she supports a bill thatwould exclude trans athletes from female sports. “Letting trans athletes compete in female sport is a slap in the face to women,” Bagger told an interviewer. She explained that trans women competing in female sports leagues when they are  more biologically similar to men and often have not undergone the medical procedures necessary for complete transition is unfair and undermines the integrity of the sport.

(Are you reading this, Lia?) Continue reading →

I sat down at Ol’ Betsy (I call my PC Ol’ Betsy) to write the first post of the day, and what do I find in the “Pending Comments” queue but a comment submitted for publication by “Lisa Clifton” regarding this October 21 essay which discussed an interesting legal and ethical issue. My analysis was clear, amusing and correct, but Lisa was outraged by the piece. Why? Because she didn’t understand it, or didn’t read it carefully, so she just dashed off an insulting rant. In fact, she dinged her own comment in the first few sentences:

Jack Marshall, what the hell gives you the right to call Dillon Webb a jerk. Bc you don’t like what her wrote. I guess that makes you a jerk as well. Bc I don’t like what you wrote. Leave it to the “fake news, lying ass, sorry pieces of shit press” to condemn someone else for writing what they want to….

First, Lisa didn’t check the comment rules (above) before foaming at her metaphorical mouth. That never bodes well. Then, her first sentence… Continue reading →

What awful ethics stories have happened in April!

Today, for example, we note the anniversary of the massacre at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado, south of Denver, in 1999. At approximately 11:19 a.m., Dylan Klebold, 17, and Eric Harris, 18, dressed in trench coats, began shooting students outside the school before moving inside. Klebold and Harris murdered 12 fellow students and a teacher, while wounding 23 more. Then they killed themselves. The tragedy opened the chapter of school shootings for the nation and the culture, inspiring other maniacs, began the devolution of high schools into fortresses, and galvanized anti-Second Amendment activism. As is now routine, the news media distorted the tale to its own needs. For example, it was initially reported that one female student was asked by one of the shooter if she believed in God. When she said, “Yes,” she was shot to death. It was an inspiring human interest tale that led her parents to author a Christianity-centered book titled “She Said Yes,” while Klebold and Harris were pigeon-holed as anti-Christian bigots. We now know the question asked of another student who had already been shot. When that victim answered “Yes,” the shooter walked away. Nah, makes the killers seem less evil. “Print the legend.”

1. More “Mikado” political correctness desecration (and another reason to boycott my reunion). The Harvard Gilbert and Sullivan Players (which I and four other students saved from collapsing in 1971), rewrote the script of G&S’s greatest operetta, they claimed, “to avoid featuring Japanese stereotypes and racist interpretations.” The new plot is about, I kid you not, goat-herding in a future Chinese-dominated London. As a director, I applaud and encourage creative efforts to re-interpret classics, but to presume to improve upon Gilbert by a wholesale re-write is the height of hubris.

I would also expect an organization that has interpreted the works of the brilliant Victorian team since the 1920s to be able to explain to the knee-jerk cultural revolutionaries that there is nothing “racist” about “The Mikado,” which is a still funny satire on Victorian British society, set in a typical Gilbertian fantasy-land where characters behave absurdly, but oddly logically.

I would expect that, but I would be tragically wrong. [Pointer: Steve-O-in NJ]

2. Mask ethics update!

• By now you know that a federal judge struck down the CDC’s transportation mask mandate, for the rather obvious reason that it didn’t have the power or authority to inflict it without going through the proper steps, which it did not. It doesn’t matter whether the rule is wise or not: lawmaking and rulemaking still have to follow due process. The Left no longer believes that, as we have seen repeatedly in recent years, notably in the 2020 Democratic Presidential Candidates debate, when Joe Biden was chided (by Kamala Harris among others) for rejecting a policy that he viewed as illegal.
• Here is the New York Times headline this morning: “Masks Ditched To Jeers, Fears And Confusion.” That’s deliberate obfuscation: the most reported reaction on board planes to the announcement of the mask requirement’s demise was cheers. (The Times resorted to a fairer headline on its website.)
• A telling snippet from the article: “Brooke Tansley, who was flying with two children too young to be vaccinated, said she felt scared as the passengers around her slipped off their masks. “All I could do was hope it’s going to be OK,” she said.” This is what two years of media fearmongering, political hyperbole and CDC incompetence has done to gullible and vulnerable Americans, and it will take longer to recover from this than the pandemic.
• Broadway, meanwhile, is still making its audiences mask up to watch unmasked performers (except in “Phantom of the Opera,” of course). Anyone who would pay 100 bucks or more for a ticket to sit in discomfort, glasses fogging up, in unregulated cloth masks that are mostly useless is….well, I guess he or she is a rich progressive, which is who Broadway caters to. This edict is, I assert, more political than health-related.

Live theater is on the endangered species of entertainment list, and professional theater is in denial.

• This relates to the previous post about the intellectual limitations of journalists…here is Slate journalist Mark Stern’s brilliant analysis:

Experts! You know, those health officials who said, in dizzying combinations, “masks not needed,” “wear masks,” “no masks if vaccinated,” “Masks don’t really do much good,” and “Never mind masks if you’re rioting for social justice, but better wear them at weddings.” Judges, meanwhile exist, and are trained, and are by definition experts in what is legal and what is not, no matter who appointed them, or how old they are. Continue reading →