The update is simple: nothing has changed.
Ethics Alarms first noted the Illya Shapiro debacle here, on January 29 of this year. The incoming newly-appointed executive director for the Robert A. Levy Center for Constitutional Studies posted a (admittedly badly worded) tweet critical of President Biden’s stated criteria for choosing the replacement for retiring Supreme Court Justice Breyer, and the Law Center’s wonderfully woke (and unethical) Dean despicably called his tweet racist and suspended him pending the obligatory “investigation.” Here I wrote about a letter of protest to the Dean from various Law Center Alumni (including me). Here Ethics Alarms noted the letter of protest signed by professors from schools all over the country (but none from the Law Center) pointing out that “the substance of the which is that Sri Srinivasan is the most qualified progressive nominee, and that it’s wrong for the President to pass him over because of race and sex, is a position that is most certainly protected by academic freedom principles of “[f]ree inquiry and unconstrained publication of the results of inquiry.”
Here I highlighted a Federal judge’s rebuke of the Dean’s action while speaking to GULC students. Yet yesterday marked the 100th day since Dean Trainor suspended Shapiro for a perfectly defensible opinion that happened to be contrary to progressive cant, following a demand from the school’s black students organization that Shapiro be fired.
Of course, there is nothing to investigate, and never was. The episode spoke for itself; there were no unrevealed facts to uncover. The College Fix emailed Georgetown spokesperson Ruth McBain last week regarding the status of the imaginary investigation and which policy or policies the Law School believes he violated, but no response was forthcoming. Meanwhile, as Trainor undoubtedly calculated, those who resent the Law Center’s partisan and political censorship have moved on to other concerns.
For his part, Shapiro says he is confident that he will be reinstated. I don’t know why he would want to be reinstated at such a place, particularly as head of an alleged Constitutional studies center at a law school that doesn’t believe in the First Amendment.
Georgetown University is now one of the most flagrantly political and ideological of elite American universities. Its self-description begins, nauseatingly, “We’re a leading research university with a heart,” and goes on to state, “We’re a forward-looking, diverse community devoted to social justice, restless inquiry and respect for each person’s individual needs and talents.”
But not, clearly, their point of view and opinions.
As I promised ( I know I mentioned it, but I don’t recall where), I boycotted my law school class reunion this year because I don’t care to be seen as endorsing this fallen institution or the hypocrites currently leading it. I wasn’t the only class stalwart conspicuous in absentia: almost nobody showed up.
Oh yes…one last note. I was amused to see that Georgetown hasn’t bothered to check its own website’s graphics. That photo above heads the “Core Values” page. All the students pictured are white.