
D-Day was always a big deal in the Marshall household back in Arlington, Massachusetts. My war hero father always reminded me that he was supposed to be an observer during the invasion, watching and noting what was happening while not carrying a weapon. Hand grenade shrapnel mangled his foot shortly before they hit the beaches, so Dad ended up in an army hospital, getting out just in time to cram his reconstructed foot into a boots and fight in the Battle of the Bulge. He told me that I probably owed my existence to the fact that he wasn’t part of D-Day.
I first posted this essay on Veteran’s Day several years ago, and I re-posted it on the anniversary of D-Day in 2021. In 2024, I promised to re-post the essay every June 6th, and then being the disorganized, ADD jerk that regular readers here know I am, I whiffed the very next year.
This is a remarkable story, and I do not understand why it is so seldom told that I never learned about it until 2009 (which, ironically, is when my father died). Of course, based on the historical literacy I have been seeing in the past three generations, a depressing number of American citizens don’t know what D-Day was—you know, our big victory after the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor while Woodrow Wilson was President.
***
After all these many years of reading about and watching movies and TV shows about D-Day, June 6, 1944, I discovered how the US Navy saved the invasion and maybe the world after stumbling upon a 2009 documentary on the Smithsonian channel.
If you recall the way the story is told in “The Longest Day” and other accounts, US troops were pinned down by horrific fire from the German defenses on Omaha beach until Gen. Norman Cota (Robert Mitchum in the movie) rallied them to move forward, and by persistence his infantry troops ultimately broke through. Yet it was US destroyers off the Normandy shore that turned the tide of the battle at Omaha, an element that isn’t shown in “The Longest Day” (or “Saving Private Ryan”) at all.
Though it was not part of the plan, the captains of the Navy destroyers decided to come in to within 800 yards of the beach and use their big guns at (for them) point blank range to pound the German artillery, machine gun nests and sharpshooters. The barrage essentially wiped them out, allowing Cota’s troops to get up and over without being slaughtered. I’ve never seen that explained or depicted in any film, and according to the Smithsonian’s video, apparently it is a vital feature of the battle that had been inexplicably neglected. No monument to the US Navy commemorating its contributions on 6/6/44 was erected at Normandy until 2009.
Here’s the relevant part of account from the Naval History website on “Operation Neptune,” the Navy counterpart to Operation Overlord:
“..The success of the invasion seemed most dubious at Omaha Beach, where the American GIs remained pinned down, unable to move forward onto the bluffs from where German troops poured murderous fire. Successive waves of infantrymen attempting to come ashore only added to the chaotic situation. “What saved the day for the Allies was a handful of British and American destroyers,” as historian Craig Symonds asserts. Officially, the destroyers were only to screen the invasion fleet from U-boats and the smaller, faster E-boats. Yet, with the crisis on Omaha reaching a critical point, they were ordered to provide close-in fire support for the troops stuck on the beach. Rear Admiral Carleton F. Bryant, who commanded the naval gunfire support groups, radioed a message from his battle station onboard Texas to the nearby destroyers: “Get on them, men! Get on them! They are raising hell with the men on the beach, and we can’t have any more of that. We must stop it.”
…Under orders not to fire more than half the ammunition they carried in case it was needed for an emergency situation, the destroyer captains decided unanimously that chaotic Omaha Beach was such a situation. Beginning around 0800, destroyers such as Emmons (DD-457), Carmick (DD-493), McCook (DD-496), Doyle (DD-494), Baldwin (DD-624), Harding (DD-625), Frankford (DD-497), and Thompson (DD-627) began engaging German positions…. With smoke still obscuring the enemy guns, the gunners onboard the “tin cans” searched for “targets of opportunity.” Carmick arrived off Normandy with 1,500 shells for her 5-inch guns and in less than an hour, fired 1,127 of them. Her gun barrels, smoking red hot, had to be hosed down in order to keep them firing. Finally, at around noon, the destroyers established contact with spotters ashore.
Two of the U.S. destroyers, Satterlee (DD-626) and Thompson (DD-627), supported over 200 men of the Army’s 2nd Ranger Battalion scaling the cliffs at Pointe du Hoc. The Rangers’ mission involved destroying several heavy guns the enemy could use against the landing forces at both beaches. Joined later by Ellyson (DD-454), the three destroyers provided indirect fire on German positions atop the cliffs, enabling the Rangers to reach the top…
For over 90 minutes, U.S. destroyers pounded the enemy gun positions. Some of the ships were so close in to shore that they received German rifle and machine-gun bullets to their hulls and superstructures. …The Allies put nearly 132,500 men ashore on D-Day. After the beachheads were firmly established, the “primary naval responsibility [was] the landing of men and supplies…
The troops were in trouble on Omaha. Many tanks and artillery pieces, expected to give the infantrymen covering fire, had not made it to the U.S. beaches. The Neptune plan had to be changed. Destroyers were ordered to risk grounding by steaming close to shore and firing their 5-inch guns as supporting fire for the men on the beach. The Emmons and other fire-support destroyers sailed as close as 1,000 yards from the beaches. (Historian Samuel Eliot Morison puts the destroyers within 800 yards of Omaha Beach.) Another close-in destroyer, the Jeffers (DD-621), was shelling a German position when the shrapnel of a near-miss wounded five of her crew.
The Emmons lost contact with her shore-fire control party. Not knowing whether the men had been killed, wounded, or captured, her gunners shot at whatever looked like a good target. A spotter saw some German naval troops marching down Port en Bessin’s main street. She sprayed them with her 40-mm battery, sending them scattering. The Carmick (DD-493) aided tanks that made it ashore on Omaha. As the tanks were trying to fight their way toward an exit called the Vierville draw, Carmick spotters watched for bursts along the edge of the bluff and used these bursts as targets, figuring that whatever U.S. tanks were aiming at was worth shooting at from a U.S. ship.…
Navy gunners, aided by the highly classified top secret Bigot maps, knocked out eight gun emplacements covering Omaha Beach exits. Firing over the heads of troops, a destroyer silenced an 88-mm gun by putting two rounds through the gun shield.
The Harding (DD-625), Satterlee (DD-626), and McCook (DD-496), supported the Ranger assault on Pointe du Hoc, the 100-foot cliff believed to hide long-range German guns that could be aimed at landing craft approaching the Utah and Omaha beaches. As the craft carrying the Rangers neared the shore, the McCook raced ahead and, near the breaking surf, let loose on cannon atop the cliff. Witnesses said they saw an enemy gun fall to the beach. The guns the Rangers sought had been removed, but the strong-point was well defended; of the 250 Rangers who landed, only 90 could still bear arms when the battle for the bluff ended two days later. The Harding put a boat ashore to pick up wounded Rangers—and Germans who had surrendered after a salvo from the McCook.Shortly before noon, Colonel B. B. Talley on Omaha Beach sent a message to Major General Leonard T. Gerow, commander of V Corps on Omaha: “Troops moving up slope of Fox, Green, and Red Beaches. I join you in thanking God for our Navy.”
Well, my father (who was supposed to be an observer during the invasion but ended up in an army hospital instead) was an infantry guy, and never inclined to give credit to the Navy (and especially the Marines) without prompting, so I won’t blame myself for missing this part of the story in my World War II tutoring from Major Jack Marshall Sr. Still, I am astonished that the popular conception of the heroic Allied effort to take the beaches on D-Day have left out such an important aspect of the victory, and humbled that someone like me, who places such importance on the appreciation and knowledge of American history as a crucial aspect of life competence, could have been misinformed for so long.
***
Maybe this is why Ike reportedly walked out of the special screening of “The Longest Day” set up for him. Whatever the reason for the historical amnesia, I place it in the same category as Joshua Chamberlain’s heroics on Little Round Top that probably saved the Union at the Battle of Gettysburg. Until the publishing of the brilliant historical novel “The Killer Angels,” that aspect of the battle was barely mentioned; there is no whisper of it at the Gettysburg Battlefield. Custer’s chance cavalry confrontation with J.E.B. Stuart’s horsemen charge that may have been decisive in turning Picket’s Charge is another example.
I’d like to see every American make sure the next generation is better educated on what really happened on this day in 1944. As King Arthur sings in “Camelot”…
Ask ev’ry person if he’s heard the story,
And tell it strong and clear if he has not…I promise to do my part.
Here is the inscription on the Normandy memorial pictured above:

This the 82nd Anniversary of the Allied invasion at Normandy to (D-Day). However, 6 months before the Battle of Anzio commenced on 22 January 1944. The battle began with the Allied amphibious landing known as Operation Shingle, and ended on 4 June 1944, with the invasion of Rome. The liberation of Rome, on June 6, 1944, has been overshdowed by Normandy.
Below is the military cemetary at Nessuno Italy!
Rest in peace, all who gave all to free the world of the tyrannical Nazis.
On this day we were united in a just cause. Today, unfortnately, we are divided over an equally just cause.
The allies invaded France and Italy to “destroy tyranny and restore freedom and self determination.” How ironic we’re currently engaged in a domestic effort to stunt the apparently inexorable growth of tyranny and conformity and oppression foisted upon us by our betters.
See, eg. Krugman Calls For a De-MAGAification Purge: “Maybe It’s Not Going To Be Doable, But We Have To Try” | Video | RealClearPolitics
He consciously uses a term he himself likens to “de-Nazification” to describe what he considers will need to be done to “MAGA” people. Breathtaking. And ironic. Half the country are now Nazis.
The unfortunate truth of the matter is that, while the totalitarian Nazis in Germany and the totalitarian Bushido militarists in Japan were defeated…totalitarianism in general advanced in the developed world.
I’d love to teleport an entrepreneur or average citizen from the 1910s or 1920s United States, somehow plug into them all the myriad experiences of working with government combined with the myriad ways government can review and interfere with your life today and ask them if they think we’re a totalitarian state from his point of view.
I don’t think I’d be surprised if he said yes.
Our great family friend and Pacific theater Sea-Bee, held a major grudge against General Mark Clark for, in our friend’s words, “getting a lot of Army guys slaughtered” at Anzio.
By the way, our neighbor’s Italian American father was somehow inserted into and worked as a spy in Sicily during the war. His biggest fear was being recognized by family members.
I truly appreciate you posting these history essays. I was not much of a history student in school, and am uninterested in war generally, so most of what you share is new to me. I don’t even think our US or World history class made it into the 20th century and my parents never spoke about it much. Currently, I don’t even know how to get accurate history even if I wanted to. That said, I tend to share your history posts with my kids in hopes that they will eventually understand the premise behind current events better than I do.
I’m not sure we ever made it much past the Civil War in American History in high school. Just ran out of days of the school year. So much, we seem to just pick up by osmosis. And there were television shows like “The Twentieth Century” that showed all the film that had been shot during World War Two and the Korean War.
For anyone who wants to “get more history”, here’s the web site of a guy who is drafting history lessons for high-school students. http://www.criticalthinkinginhistory.com/
Lathechuck
That’s an interesting listing of topics. I foresee many a postponed chore and “going to bed at a reasonable hour” ignored due to chasing down those lessons.
For someone wanting to play catch-up, I would also recommend reading some biographies/autobiographies and memoirs of persons who participated. Much to learn and often different views depending on where their observation points were. In addition check out works by Stephen Ambrose for detailed material on WW2 European Theater (“Band of Brothers”, ” Citizen Soldiers”, and “D-Day: June 6, 1944”) As well as “Undaunted Courage” (Lewis & Clark) and “Nothing Like It In The World” (transcontinental railroad). Probably all these and more at your local library.
Thanks for your suggestions. I will look into biographies/autobiographies and the website. I truly dislike war stories, although I did manage to watch Midway, being more strategic than about the actual people who fought. Call me sensitive, knowing something really happened, seeing the gore on film, even if everyone involved is long gone makes me unbelievably sad. I feel like it’s some sort of exploitation, telling about actual events of people who never had the chance to approve the story.
Another thing to remember is the fall of Rome. Overshadowed by D Day, it was as the Federalist podcast reminds us, the first major Axis capital to surrender.