• “I know some of the names” (She doesn’t.)…
• “This is not about me…” (Yes, it’s about Navarro’s hypocrisy, bias and selective concern)
• “I want to pronounce these names…” (No , she wants to impugn ICE and clearly doesn’t care about the crimes committed by illegal immigrants)
• “…because we need to put names and faces…” on the incidents that can be used to impugn law enforcement and to advance the cause of open borders.
• “But the people they killed don’t have criminal records..” Wait, what? What does that have to do with anything? Law enforcement is allowed to kill people who do have criminal records? Does she think the murder victims of illegal immigrants had criminal records?

Forced to defend her biased focus, Navarro shows that she literally has nothing—not facts, not arguments, and not the wit and intelligence to make a good faith effort to produce a counter argument when she is challenged. The woman brings nothing to public discourse and never has. She was recruited by ABC in 2014 as they looked for a female Hispanic commentator and were so desperate that they ignored her annoying speech impediment; what mattered is that she was a minority Republican staffer who was reliably NeverTrump. In all these years on TV, she has never been articulate, analytical, objective or perceptive, and under pressure, Navarro descends into anger and gibberish, as she did here. She’s not funny, as her fellow Angry Ladies on “The View,” Joy Behar and Whoopi can be; she’s not pleasant to listen to or look at (like Sunshine…at least that’s something): it is irresponsible for CNN or anyone else to represent to the audience that Ana has anything of value to contribute to any issue or any discussion.