Rationalization #30 (“It’s a bad law/stupid rule”) Chronicles: Vijay Chokalingam’s Affirmative Action Fraud

Affirmative Action

Actress Mindy Kaling, whom you might know from the sitcom she created and now stars in called “The Mindy Project,” has a brother who has exploited both his relationship to his famous sister and an ethically indefensible fraud to gain some momentary fame and perhaps a book deal. Vijay Chokalingam has revealed that 17 years ago he gained acceptance to St. Louis University’s School of Medicine by falsely representing himself as an African-American.

On his new website, Almost Black, Chokalingam explains,

In my junior year of college, I realized that I didn’t have the grades or test scores to get into medical school, at least not as an Indian-American. Still, I was determined to become a doctor and I knew that admission standards for certain minorities under affirmative action were, let’s say… less stringent? So, I shaved my head, trimmed my long Indian eyelashes, and applied to medical school as a black man. My change in appearance was so startling that my own fraternity brothers didn’t recognize me at first. I even joined the Organization of Black Students and started using my embarrassing middle name that I had hidden from all of my friends since I was a 9 years old.

Vijay the Indian-American frat boy become Jojo the African American Affirmative Action applicant to medical school….I became a serious contender at some of the greatest medical schools in America, including Harvard, Wash U, UPenn, Case Western, and Columbia. In all, I interviewed at eleven prestigious medical schools in 9 major cities across America, while posing a black man.

“Jo-Jo” made no effort to hide his many advantages from the admissions officers, he told the New York Post.

“I disclosed that I grew up in one of the wealthiest towns in Massachusetts, that my mother was a doctor, and that my father was an architect I disclosed that I didn’t receive financial aid from the University of Chicago, and that I had a nice car. I was the campus rich kid, let’s just put it on the table. And yet they considered me an affirmative-action applicant.”

Having illegitimately achieved admission and taken one of the limited slots for medical training available in the U.S., Chokalingam didn’t have the decency to stay in medical school, but chose to drop out and go to business school instead, this time as the Indian-American he is. There he learned, apparently, how to pitch projects. He prudently waited until the statute of limitations on fraud had expired, and came forward with his tale to sell a proposed affirmative action version of the classic “Black Like Me.” Chokalingam says he’s revealing his race ruse now because UCLA is considering strengthening its affirmative-action admissions policies, and he believes the practice is institutional racism.

He’s right about that, but that’s all he’s right about.

Seventeen years ago he engaged in fraud, using deception to acquire something of value he was not entitled to. He is quite right that an affirmative policy that would admit a mediocre student who comes from a wealthy background, good schools and an affluent neighborhood, simply because he identifies as black and has dark skin, is unfair, undemocratic, illogical, divisive…oh, all that and more. It is a stupid policy, but the fact that a policy, rule or law is mistaken, badly conceived or unjust doesn’t change the fact that surreptitiously violating it is unethical. In this case it is unusually so, for the medical school spot that he stole might have given a dedicated young man or woman a chance to become a doctor.

Chokalingam’s shameless revelation also marks him as a fick, an individual who is blatantly unethical and yet unapologetic about his wrongdoing. His rationalization, in addition to #30 on the Rationalizations List, is that “the ends justify the means,” or  #13, The Saint’s Excuse: “It’s for a good cause.” In this he is engaging in the retroactive ennobling of his self-serving exception: when he cheated and lied to get into med school, he wasn’t trying to expose the system. Then he just wanted to steal a place in a medical school class, and did. Now he’s painting his miserable conduct as a blow for the greater good, so he can sell a book, a movie, and become a celebrity like his sister.

Does he really think that anyone who has been paying attention for, oh, about half a century now, hasn’t figured out that affirmative action policies are toxic quota systems that elevate skin color over industry, ability and academic skill? Does anyone not acknowledge that they discriminate against whites and Asians, and undermine trust in the minority professionals who go on to graduate, as they will always labor under the constant suspicion that they were not and are not qualified to do their jobs?

I’ve known this since I was in the administration of Georgetown Law Center decades ago.  I helped the daughter of a wealthy alumnus and lawyer get accepted by changing her application to reflect that fact that she had a Chinese grandmother. Was that fair to the better qualified applicant who didn’t have a minority connection to push him over the line? Of course not. Did it benefit any underprivileged and historically discriminated-against group to allow a wealthy, Wellesley-educated young woman get into law school on the virtues of having the right color grandmother?

No: it is a stupid policy. That fact doesn’t make compounding the stupidity and using it to get into med school as an unqualified student who can’t legitimately use racial preferences to push aside a more qualified and deserving applicant less than contemptible in every way.

As is often the case—James O’Keefe’s unethical hidden camera stunts come to mind—Mindy’s fick of a brother ‘s unethical conduct may have some beneficial results, if only by alerting those who have not been paying attention to how indefensible affirmative action programs are in 2015.

I must admit to some pleasure in the discomfort of knee-jerk defenders of these discriminatory admission policies, like CNN’s Jeff Young, who sputters and spins but can’t make the central ethics problem go away: university affirmative action policies often admit real minorities who are no more disadvantaged than Chokalingam because they have the right skin color or ancestry (or claimed ancestry, like Cherokee Elizabeth Warren), and such a policy is a disgrace in the United States of America.

Young begins by making sure we understand that the medical school that accepted “Jo-Jo” “falls somewhere between 57th and 67th in national rankings. Harvard, University of Pennsylvania, Columbia and all the higher ranked schools he applied to rejected him.” So? The man still got into medical school by pretending to be black. If his grades had been better, that ruse would have worked at the other schools too. Then Young gives a full-throated defense of affirmative action, similar to the arguments we have heard since the mid-Sixties:

“One-third of Americans are black, Hispanic or Native American; just one in 10 physicians are. Since minority medical practitioners are up to three times as likely to practice in their own communities, this lack of diversity has produced “doctor deserts,” in which urban and rural ethnic enclaves across the nation go without access to primary care physicians.”

To which the answer is: then we need to find a way to train more black, Hispanic and Native American students to develop sufficient skills to allow them to get into medical school on their merits, rather than their skin color. Filling the need for minority doctors with graduates who lacked sufficient qualifications to be admitted absent the use of an anti-white and anti-Asian racial bias ensures that minority communities will suffer from inadequate and incompetent medical care indefinitely. Young’s argument made some sense when “Black Like Me” was published (1961) and could be plausibly defended as a necessary evil, a utilitarian measure to cut the Gordian Knot tied by slavery, Jim Crow, and institutionalized racism. Now affirmative action programs survive as entitlements and progressive sacred cows that impede racial progress.

That, however, does not make what Mindy Kaling’s brother did, or is doing now by taking a belated victory lap , any less wrong. He says his sister opposes his book idea, saying that it bring shame on their family.

I’m with Mindy.

_________________________

Pointer: Rick Jones

Sources: CNN, NY Post, Jezebel, Almost Black

14 thoughts on “Rationalization #30 (“It’s a bad law/stupid rule”) Chronicles: Vijay Chokalingam’s Affirmative Action Fraud

  1. Yes, Jack. He was ethically wrong and for the reasons you state. Still, I find it hard to be angry with him to any degree! Anyone who can blindside those arrogant academic race hucksters with their own idiocy raises a little perverse (if you’ll forgive the term!) good humor in me. Two wrongs don’t make a right, of course. But this is the sort of thing that makes the Robin Hood stories enjoyable.

    • The fact that there’s an affirmative action program in medical schools makes me NUTS ! Pre-medicine is an ordeal, especially if you end up doing it as a post-baccalaureate certificate like me. “Oh, you’d like to cut in line? By all means! Let me get the door for you. Here, let me give you my MCAT scores and GPA, just to make sure. It’s the least I can do, after what my great, great, great-grandparents probably DIDN’T do to yours. It’s not as if you’ll get preferential treatment anywhere else.” Now just sit back, and watch race relations take a giant leap forward.

      • Joe, I bow to you again, smiling (actually, I am bowing to restrain the violence of my diaphragm muscle’s flutterings – my laugh muscles are out of shape, but not as bad as the rest of my insides). That (your April 12 at 8:48 am) is BEAUTIFUL! I am blessed to be “brainless” (from head having exploded previously) – no aneurysms! You’re in my Comment Hall of Fame.

        • Thanks, I try my best. Affirmative action for medical school has to be the poster child for its wrongness. It’s wrong for obvious reasons, like the fact that these are people who will dig around in people’s bodies with sharp instruments and carefully select sub-lethal doses of poisons as chemical rearrangers. It’s also wrong because of the fact that pre-medicine is as much a rite of passage and a stress-test to see if you have the chops for medical school, as it is a thorough, rigorous foundation of science. As an example, this is my list of courses for my certificate: pre-calculus, calc I and II, statistics, physics for engineering I and II, general chemistry, analytical chem, organic chem, organic synthesis, biochem, physical chem, cell biology, molecular biology, microbiology, genetics, genomics, and anatomy and physiology I and II, and labs for all courses except math. Not to mention, a semester of studying for the MCAT. This is grueling stuff. It demands your undivided attention, and God help you if you screw up a class. The first analogy that comes to mind as I write this is riding a bull. Everything’s great as long as you maintain your rhythm and exertion, but the second you let up, you fall off and you’re not likely to get back on. I almost went into a fatal tailspin when I missed an organic chem lecture one time. I spent the next week trying to catch up by pulling all- nighters, neglecting my other courses and exponentially compounding the original problem. This reverberated through everything for the next few weeks, and that was almost all the previous work down the toilet. One bad grade often can make the difference, with med school acceptance being so competitive. I had to go above and beyond with my courses to give me an edge, hoping to balance out my age as a factor. No spare time, no family time, just studying. After that, along comes someone with a middling GPA and MCAT score, and he or she can possibly take my seat because of skin color? People wonder why one might get pissed when he’s accused of enjoying white priviledge.

  2. It is a stupid policy, but the fact that a policy, rule or law is mistaken, badly conceived or unjust doesn’t change the fact that surreptitiously violating it is unethical.

    Why can not the same be said about Rosa Parks, who took a seat meant for a white person?

  3. I’d add that his reasoning for writing the book had nothing to do with UCLA’s impending decision. He wanted to write a book/make easy money/get his 15 minutes and is lying about the reason. He probably Googled “affirmative action” to see what the latest news was and latched on to UCLA when it showed up on his computer screen.
    Did I mention he calls himself an “Affirmative Action Hacktivist” on Twitter, though his first identifier is as “@MindyKaling’s brother/nememis.” Also, he does claim that he tried to get into medical school identifying as a black man to shine light on the horrors of affirmative action. So in addition to cheating and lying (which he continues to do), he’ll also abuse his family connections in his quest for fame and fortune. Nice guy.

  4. “Does he really think that anyone who has been paying attention for, oh, about half a century now, hasn’t figured out that affirmative action policies are toxic quota systems that elevate skin color over industry, ability and academic skill? Does anyone not acknowledge that they discriminate against whites and Asians, and undermine trust in the minority professionals who go on to graduate, as they will always labor under the constant suspicion that they were not and are not qualified to do their jobs?”

    Yes there are such people. In fact, there are several on the Supreme Court alone!

Leave a reply to stvplln Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.