Wow! MSNBC’s Joy Reid May Have Given Us The Biggest Jumbo Ever!

The fact that MSNBC continues to employ Joy Reid, so unethical in so many ways,  would be sufficient all by itself to justify never trusting the network. Just in case her racebaiting, bias and hate-mongering weren’t enough, however, now she has issued a mind-blowing Jumbo of such magnitude and audacity that it is impossible to deny that either she is willing to lie about anything, or in the alternative, is nuts. There do not seem to be any other explanations.

On Ethics Alarms, a Jumbo is the term for a desperate, ridiculous lie that insults the intelligence of all who hear it. The term comes from name of the elephant Jimmy Durante was trying to sneak out of the circus in Billy Rose’s eponymous Broadway extravaganza “Jumbo,” when he was stopped by a sheriff, in the show’s most famous moment. “Where are you going with that elephant?” demanded The Law. “Elephant? What elephant?” answered the Schnozzola, innocently. But Reid’s Jumbo out-Jumbos Jimmy.

It all began last December, when some homophobic posts on Reid’s old blog surfaced. Then she issued a self-contradictory apology, flagged in this Ethics Alarms entry. but it turned out that there were more such posts to be found. Six days ago, the media site Mediaite uncovered more posts by Reid that were critical of homosexuality and gays, from The Reid Report, a now defunct blog that Reid authored long before she became a warrior of “the resistance.”  They were originally tracked down and shared on Twitter by sleuth Jamie Maz, who found them using the internet archiving service, the Wayback Machine, which takes screenshots of frequently trafficked web pages to preserve them. Reid’s response was to deny that she wrote the posts:

“In December I learned that an unknown, external party accessed and manipulated material from my now-defunct blog, The Reid Report, to include offensive and hateful references that are fabricated and run counter to my personal beliefs and ideology.

I began working with a cyber-security expert who first identified the unauthorized activity, and we notified federal law enforcement officials of the breach. The manipulated material seems to be part of an effort to taint my character with false information by distorting a blog that ended a decade ago.

Now that the site has been compromised I can state unequivocally that it does not represent the original entries. I hope that whoever corrupted the site recognizes the pain they have caused, not just to me, but to my family and communities that I care deeply about: LGBTQ, immigrants, people of color and other marginalized groups.”

To be blunt but accurate, she was lying.

As several commentators pointed out, this bizarre conspiracy theory requires one to accept that before either Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton changed their positions on gay marriage, and before Reid was a TV pundit that depended keeping her audience  happy through  complete fealty to all positions progressive, some evil genius had the foresight to alter her blog to represent her as homophobic. It is similar to the claims of birthers who insist that Barack Obama’s “fake” birth announcement in a Honolulu paper was planted there, or O.J.’s defense team’s (successful!) argument that the police planted blood in O.J’s car and home before they could possibly know whether he was a plausible suspect.

Reid’s public lie quickly fell apart, though she even went to the extent of having her lawyer confirm that the FBI was investigating “potential criminal activities surrounding several online accounts” belonging to Reid. Multiple experts concluded that what Reid was claiming is impossible. Her blog had not been hacked. Now she was caught in her blatant  lie,  and indeed it might be a criminal one, since she was prompting an FBI investigation with a falsehood.

So what did Reid do? Did she come clean and admit that the posts were as they appeared to be? No! Did she do the honorable and mature thing, and say that she had learned a great deal since publicizing those now politically-incorrect opinions, like the one where she wrote that she didn’t like to see men kissing, and was avoiding “Brokeback Mountain” because it would nauseate her? No! This would be especially difficult for someone like Reid, who practices the Unprincipled Left’s practice of demanding current condemnation, and no mercy, for conservative figures who uttered unacceptable sentiments before they were famous and powerful. For the Unforgiving Left, bigotry is forever (unless it’s Antisemitism), sexism is forever (unless you are Bill Clinton), sexual harassment is forever (unless you are Joe Biden), and anti-gay sentiments are forever (unless you are Barack Obama). So, taking her cue from Jimmy, Joy Reid said this yesterday on her show, AM Joy:

“Here’s what I know: I genuinely do not believe I wrote those hateful things. But I can definitely understand, based on things I have said and have written in the past, that some people don’t believe me.”

That’s right. The posts were on her blog, which she, and only she, wrote.  Her claims that the screen shots were false and that the blog contents were hacked were decisively debunked. Nevertheless, Joy Reid says she “genuinely” does not believe that she wrote them!

This is easily as outrageous as pretending that you aren’t aware of the biggest elephant in the world that you have on the end of a short rope, but it’s not nearly as funny. Millions of Americans turn to Reid, in their blind hatred of their own nation’s elected leader, for analysis and guidance, and now she is either willing to state that what she knows to be true isn’t when it suits her needs, or she is delusional. Either state renders her unfit to be employed by a news organization. I’m not sure there is an occupation where an employer could responsibly excuse either malady at this high level. (In “Jumbo,” Jimmy was a circus clown.)

As often is the case, the bright side of this depressing example of an ideological shill exposing his or her trustworthiness deficit is that we now have an effective integrity test. Your friends who react to this episode by saying, in essence, “I don’t care; I like what she says!” are lost utterly. So is MSNBC, if it doesn’t have the integrity to send an emphatic message that “we don’t give liars their own TV shows” (well, except for Al Sharpton)….but MSNBC was lost a long, long time ago.

Here’s an example of how the Joy Reid Jumbo Integrity Test works: Eric Holder, who says he might run for President, tweeted,

“Joy Ann Reid apology. Appropriate. Heartfelt. This unique and compelling voice for tolerance and equality should not be silenced. We learn – and change – from our mistakes. She has.”

What?? You don’t apologize by denying that what you are apologizing for happened. Appropriate? How is it ever appropriate to react like this after one lie doesn’t work—by using an even bigger, more desperate lie? Heartfelt? If Reid really does believe she didn’t write what she wrote and even the Library of Congress confirms what she wrote, then she is bonkers.

I guess that’s kind of unique for a pundit, though not really. And how does denying that a mistake occurred equal “learning and changing”?

Of course, Holder, himself a liar and a race-baiter, was a walking, talking integrity test while leading the Justice Department. If President Obama had integrity, he would have fired this hack.

In the end, this episode tells us all anyone should need to know about Joy Reid. Delusional or someone who would deny what anyone can see to rescue herself, she is unfit to have a platform with which to spread her dishonesty and incompetence

The only question now is, should I rename the Jumbo, “the Joy”?

18 thoughts on “Wow! MSNBC’s Joy Reid May Have Given Us The Biggest Jumbo Ever!

  1. The only question now is, should I rename the Jumbo, “the Joy”?

    No, you should not. From a rhetorical standpoint, “The Jumbo” is an amusing representation of a bald-faced lie that makes the premise and the point – at least in EA terms – memorable, and allows the point to be made more strongly.

    In Reid’s case, we have both res ipsa loquitur and signature significance – not just on her part, but on the part of her employer and supporters as well. If you were to coin a special Ethics Alarms term and call it The Joy, I’d argue that it should be a lie beyond a Jumbo: one that reveals broad ethical failure – not just on the part of the miscreant, but rippling out therefrom and demonstrating that the ethical failure is shared and/or embraced or rationalized by significant institutions and large numbers of people.

  2. Reid’s crock-o-shinola reminded me of an incident in The 77 Square Miles Surrounded By A Sea Of Reality a while back.

    After the CommonSenseless Council came up one vote shy of renaming Bassett Street the Ho Chi Minh Trail and before it designated the “Plastic Pink Flamingo” as the official City Bird.

    “As Comet Kohoutek approached in 1973, Eddie Ben Elson (an esteemed member of the Wisconsin Bar) announced that a beautiful, black, womanly angel had revealed to him that Kohoutek was actually an intergalactic spaceship and he was a ‘Chosen One’ because of the goodness of his heart, and would be its captain.

    ”The comet was to destroy Earth on Christmas Day as it’s tail brushed the planet turning everything to oil and covering the globe with sludge, but 144,000 lucky passengers would be saved. Elson was selling tickets for salvation. He printed 1,000 that identified him as ‘Your Savior, Edward Ben Elson, Messiah of the Odd Infinitum Church’ The 144,000 people, after buying tickets, would be magically shrunk to miniature human beings and stored in bushel baskets in the basement of Elson’s home until it was time for Kohoutek to beam them up.”

    “When the big day arrived, Eddie was in his backyard in McFarland with a portable stairway rented from Northwest Airlines. As sundown approached, Eddie climbed the stairs, looked skyward and waited. And waited.

    “A reporter said ‘Eddie, where is the comet?’

    ”Eddie replied ‘Comet? What comet?‘ ”

  3. The Holder defense itself is a disguised rebuke meant to barely cover her with the apparatchiks. I.e., she is one of us (moronic Alinskyite communists), so let it go.

  4. None of the four people who watch MSNBC will care. In fact, now that one of them (Eric Holder) has written another lie excusing her, the other three will heave a huge sigh of relief, and go on as if nothing has happened.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.